I don't seem to be able to build libtool-base on my DragonFly 1.4
system. There's no binary package to download, so I'm a bit stuck.
Am I missing something here?
Making all in tests
cd /usr/obj/pkgsrc/devel/libtool-base/work/libtool-1.5.22; for f in
libtool; do /usr/bin/sed-e "s,-L/us
On Aug 14, 2006, at 1:19 AM, walt wrote:
Works okay on my -current machine. Is shlibtool.in actually missing?
The entire files directory isn't there. It's odd. I've been using
binary packages whenever possible, so it could be my pkgsrc
collection is out of date, though the libtool-bas
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:52 AM, * William wrote:
> G'day dragonfly folk.
> I found getting any access to Dragonfly 'conversations' difficult. So my
> second question, is do you have a google or yahoo group for general
> conversation? If you want adopters -- May be you should do that? I looke
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Tim Darby wrote:
> After playing with various device files, it's looking like this card is just
> not going to work, at least not without more kernel skills than I have or
> possibly some imports from FreeBSD. So, let me ask a different question.
> What do you guy
First build of pkgsrc-2011Q1, done for x86_64/2.10. (Yeah, it's done
on 2.9, but I munged uname so that pkgsrc tools wouldn't complain.)
It's uploading now. It's somewhere about halfway through, so a full
set of packages should be there by tomorrow, I think.
These packages should be installable o
DragonFly 2.10, i386, pkgsrc-2011Q1. I think there's a fix for
rpm2pkg that is newer than the version of 2011Q1 I used.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.10.0/i386
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-04-20 02:49
Build end: 2011-04-20 19:48
Full report:
http://avalo
It's certainly possible. Nobody's working on it right now, to my
knowledge. I'm more interesting in seeing Hammer grow, so I'm not
that concerned about it.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:03 PM, David Crosswell
wrote:
> I understand the availability of UFS and Hammer in the Dragonfly
> environment,
The 2011Q1 package for 2.10/x86_64 DragonFly are done and uploaded.
The 2011Q1 2.10/i386 packages will be done later today... now that I
have the correct filepath and permissions.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Matthew Dillon
wrote:
> My weekend schedule is too crowded so we will be doing th
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 7:46 AM, David Crosswell
wrote:
> Have you ever been accused of being a drama queen before this?
Hey, it's the Internet. People get defensive easily.
What David was asking originally - is ZFS going to be ported/in the
process of porting to DragonFly - is a normal questi
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Chatoor Kalki wrote:
> hello, i'm new to unix but am interested in learning and getting a decent
> command over it as quickly as possible.
> initially i will be running dragonfly bsd within virtualbox under windows 7.
>
> can i get help with references to books?
>
You could dump out the B-tree information. I don't know how clear a
picture would come from that, and it may require some massaging of
data anyway since nonduplicated files may have some degree of
matching, duplicated data anyway, especially when dealing with larger
image file.
If you are sure th
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:02 AM, kevdmx wrote:
>
> I will change my server from freebsd to dragonflybsd,so I want to know when
> does the dragonflybsd will suppert UFS2 filesystem.
Not anytime soon, I think. We're better off working on
DragonFly-specific technologies. That being said, someone co
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Matthias Rampke
wrote:
> Is this on the WLAN? Which card? I'm having massive trouble getting ath(4) to
> work with most WLAN routers, e.g. I don't receive the DHCPOFFERs from my home
> WLAN. My phone's WiFi hotspot (Motorola Milestone / CyanogenMod 6) works
> p
This is a new bug, then, cause I think the original ath(4) problem is
fixed. I don't have the right laptop and wireless combo to test. In any
case, you may want to file a report including the network encryption type.
On May 7, 2011 4:16 AM, "Matthias Rampke" wrote:
> On Fri,
nd not
>> the particular graphics card, screen, etc., I have on my laptop.
> I don't think that's anything to worry about … I've once seen what I had on
> screen before the last reboot, so I guess this is just random contents of
> video RAM being displayed before
I have two reports on recent pkgsrc builds, so I'll just send the URLs
instead of forwarding each:
DragonFly 2.11, x86_64, pkgsrc-2011Q1:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.11/20110508.2107/meta/report.html
DragonFly 2.10, i386, pkgsrc-2011Q1: (x86_64 report filepath has been
fixed
pkgsrc-2011Q1, DragonFly 2.11/x86_64, and I think uploaded to the
right place this time.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.11/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-05-13 03:45
Build end: 2011-05-17 03:59
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64
I think wip/jdk16 in pkgsrc runs on DragonFly, or at least used to...
Also, another thing that may or may not work:
http://www.shiningsilence.com/jdk15p2_dragonfly14.tar.bz2
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> I'd like to run Freenet. It's written in Java. The Freenet people
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:08 AM, David Crosswell
wrote:
> Has anybody got any advice on what nics work best with Dragonfly, other than
> the ones on-site?
I've had good luck with Intel chipsets, like those supported by the
fxp or em drivers.
If you want a list of everything, you can look at the
You could stream master -> slave, and then if the master fails, change
the slave disk to the master. Dunno if that covers the same area for
you.
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Monday 23 May 2011 17:13:57 Matthew Dillon wrote:
>> No, unfortunately there is still one
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/release210/ has MD5 sums listed there. I
don't have access to crater to update the md5.txt file, though.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Milo wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have two questions:
>
> - Why md5 sums weren't provided for last (2.10.1) images/isos? Can
> someone
i386 build coming up soon too.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.10/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-05-28 05:44
Build end: 2011-05-28 23:12
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.10/20110528.0544/meta/report.html
Machine readable vers
There's no way to expand/shrink Hammer volumes. Another way to
approach this - and it's not necessarily better or worse - is to use
Hammer's mirroring capability to move data to a larger disk and then
start using that one, or otherwise shift it around.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Dean Hamste
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.11/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-06-03 02:14
Build end: 2011-06-06 03:10
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/i386/2.11/20110603.0214/meta/report.html
Machine readable version:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org
Wouldn't he need to do this once, to establish the local copy of the branch?
cd /usr/src && git branch DragonFly_RELEASE_2_10
origin/DragonFly_RELEASE_2_10
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Matthias Rampke
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to switch to the stable branch
>
> cd /usr/src && git checkout D
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.11/20110603.0214/meta/report.html
I copied in the wrong setting for the URL path. (s/i386/x86_64/) The
packages are in the right place, though.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Alex Hornung wrote:
>
> On 06/06/11 04:36, Justin Sherrill
The 32-bit build, recently finished on 2011Q1.
-- Forwarded message --
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.11/i386
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-06-07 03:44
Build end: 2011-06-07 16:46
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/i386/2.1
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.10/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-06-04 20:46
Build end: 2011-06-11 09:38
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.10/20110604.2046/meta/report.html
Machine readable version:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.o
> http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.11/20110603.0214/libglade-2.6.4nb5/depends.log
> and so did avahi:
> http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.11/20110603.0214/avahi-0.6.27nb4/depends.log
>
> Maybe it was a gtk2 problem causing it.
> I've got the late
I'm going to re-run this build as soon as the upload finishes; the
broken packages list is totally different than the other
DragonFly/pkgsrc-2011q2 reports I have so I suspect something wierd
may be going on, on this machine.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.10/i386
C
The binary builds for pkgsrc-2011Q2 are complete and uploaded to
avalon.dragonflybsd.org. (Well, except for DragonFly 2.10/i386. Its
upload was interrupted, so I had to restart it.)
However, pkg_radd isn't going to pull from the new builds without some
manual intervention. To access them, you n
This machine was building with MAKE_JOBS set - so these results may
improve on a subsequent build.
In any case, the biggest break was net/glib-networking, and it's
complaining that gettext isn't present. That's wierd.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.11/i386
Compil
I've built the pkgsrc bootstrap for 2011Q2 several times over
recently, and I didn't encounter this.
I assume there's something out of place on your machine that's
confusing the build. Maybe try doing a 'bmake clean'? That
suggestion sounds kinda weak now that I said it.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at
These packages failed during the build for whatever reason
doxygen-1.6.3nb4 cups-1.4.6nb1 xine-lib-1.1.19nb5 akonadi-1.4.0nb5
And kde4 is dependent on them. I haven't looked at the error for
those - it may be something very simple in each case. I got this from
looking at a recent report:
http:
Maybe check 'arp -a', and see if there's more than one machine
configured with that IP?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I try to login to the local machine with ssh, it doesn't work:
> ,
> | # ssh -v root@192.168.10.41
> | OpenSSH_5.8p1-hpn13v11 DragonFly-2
to do so.)
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Thursday 11 August 2011 09:24:46 Justin Sherrill wrote:
>> These packages failed during the build for whatever reason
>>
>> doxygen-1.6.3nb4 cups-1.4.6nb1 xine-lib-1.1.19nb5 akonadi-1.4.0nb5
>>
&g
Would it be worth setting this by default, since (someday, somehow)
IPv6 is becoming more common?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Matthias Rampke wrote:
> DragonFly doesn't accept router advertisements by default. You have to set
> something like ip6mode="autohost" in /etc/rc.conf and some sysct
know about.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Matthias Rampke wrote:
>
> On Aug 17, 2011 11:05 PM, "Justin Sherrill"
> wrote:
>>
>> Would it be worth setting this by default, since (someday, somehow)
>> IPv6 is becoming more common?
>
> I'd be in fav
ftp://crater.dragonflybsd.org/Older/
We have had complaints from mirrors that the space for DragonFly is
getting huge, though most of the pain from that is pkgsrc binary
packages.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Max Herrgard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason for not having older release isos o
I've seen a number of people say they get errors when downloading
dragonfly pkgsrc via git. I don't know what's causing it, but 2
workaround for now would be to either grab it the old-fashioned way
via CVS: (assuming tcsh)
setenv CVSROOT anon...@anoncvs.netbsd.org:/cvsroot
setenv CVS_RSH ssh
cd /
I haven't connected via PPTP on a non-Windows machine in a while, but
I bet these steps would work:
http://www.freebsddiary.org/pptp.php
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> My boss has a VPN that I need to connect to. I can connect to it from the
> Windows box, but then only t
6:32 PM, Justin Sherrill
> wrote:
>> I've seen a number of people say they get errors when downloading
>> dragonfly pkgsrc via git. I don't know what's causing it, but 2
>> workaround for now would be to either grab it the old-fashioned way
>> via
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Justin Sherrill
> wrote:
>> There's tarballs (or bzip, etc.) for recent branches and
>> pkgsrc-current at ftp.netbsd.org. For example
>>
>> ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/pkgsrc-2011Q2/
>>
>> Plus Ma
Your question is pretty open-ended - what are you looking to do? I
assume ipf means you want to set up a software firewall. Are you
looking to create a gateway for your home computers, or something
else?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Guerrero Hall wrote:
> Hi, I came across the notion of an
Finally, a pkgsrc-current build report!
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.10/i386
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-08-22 05:14
Build end: 2011-09-01 11:45
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/i386/bleeding-edge/20110822.0514/meta/report.html
Machine
>From what I've seen in the Problem Report system, there's a
'dfly-pkg-people' alias that DragonFly issues get placed with; if you
are in that group, you'll probably catch things directly.
I have binary package build reports going up at
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/ all the time - they a
I think this would do it:
route add -net 192.168.100.0/24 linuxbox.local
Substitute the IP range within your VPN for the address range, and the
name/IP of your linux box. The command won't survive a reboot; you'd
have to stick it in /usr/local/etc or something, somewhere.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 a
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Chris Turner
wrote:
> I'm happy to pitch in where possible if any of the above needs doing -
> just don't feel like I have the 'authority' to set the tone, policy etc -
You have as much authority as you can take. Go go go go go.
ce 04/22 when I look at that, though:
http://cvsweb.se.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/databases/postgresql84-client/
Am I looking in the wrong space?
MAKE_JOBS=2 was set. I removed it completely for the rebuild running now.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:21 PM, John Marino wrote:
> On 9/
My guess is that it's an older intel driver that happens to be getting
installed. The most recent version of the intel driver, 2.8, is
Linux-only, so I'm not sure how much luck you will have with any BSD.
http://pkgsrc.se/files.php?messageId=20090810061721.c330b17...@cvs.netbsd.org
You can try r
Facebook's been doing this for a while; they will 'hijack' terms based
on people talking about them and pretend there's Facebook-exclusive
groups for those topics - including DragonFly:
http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2010/06/11/6013.html
I hate to say it because it makes me sound like a cr
I don't think there's ever been activity in it, really. I set it up,
but there's no dramatic reason to put something in there.
We have a DragonFly BSD twitter account
(https://twitter.com/#!/dragonflybsd) that I post Digest headlines to.
It's really just there for the convenience of people who w
gt; swapcahce in SSD or in HAMMER /
> in order to separate data from the operating system. But I could
> not find documents for manual installation mode to meet my
> requirements. Let me know if there are any. Thanks!
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Justin Sherrill
> wrote:
>
I'm calling it a 'release candidate', but it's really just 2.12.0
built over last night. Please try it and report problems. I haven't
even run these yet.
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/2.12-RC/
The src/nrelease files are used to build an image; you could
potentially mess with them to configure a new build.
I recall someone was using a soekris device for a router, with
DragonFly - there's a custom kernel config in src/sys/config/SOEKRIS,
so it's certainly possible.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 a
The easy way to find out is to download a recent DragonFly iso or img and
boot it; they are live images, and if they work when it boots off a
CD/DVD/USB stick, you're set.
I don't know about the cache flushing, but I'll note that Hammer does not
have a RAID mechanism. It works through master/slav
Building happens all the time for the quarterly release, but it takes a
while for each round to finish - plus I've had crashing problems... so
build from source if you want it asap.
On Nov 4, 2011 2:45 PM, "Max Herrgard" wrote:
> On 4 nov 2011, at 19.19, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > Nov 4 18:15:43 d
Is it NAT you control? If it's PF-based, you can put in a rule for
that. I'm about to do the same for a hardware phone at home.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> What software phones are available? I tried kiax but it segfaulted. Kphone
> runs, but I haven't succeeded in co
The newest Intel video chipsets require GEM/KMS, which does not exist
in any BSD at this point - I think. Watch out for that...
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Edward M. wrote:
> On 11/16/11 19:32, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
>>
>> On 11/11/2011 09:41 PM, Edward M. wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
I had this problem with an old Sony laptop where the CD drive was in a
base docking unit. The solution was to install from a USB stick and
an .IMG file, in my case.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Konrad Neuwirth wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am currently trying to set up 2.13 on a server that
You could rm everything now, and then use 'bmake install clean
clean-depends' from now on, and you should be fine.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Saturday 03 December 2011 21:03:53 Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Pierre Abbat wrote:
>> > I have 8.9 GB in /us
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Matthew Dillon
wrote:
> Hello everyone! First, I apologize for the aborted 2.12 release. We
> got as far as rolling it but I decided to make a real push to try to
> fix the occassional random seg-fault bug that we were still seeing
> on 64-bit at the
It would be safe to do so. Shiningsilence.com has been running DragonFly
for maybe... 5 years now? I had 1 crash back in the 2.8 timeframe, I think
it was. If you stick to stable releases, you will be ok. That's what
those versions are for, after all.
On Dec 27, 2011 11:21 AM, "Zenny" wrote:
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Matthew Dillon
wrote:
> (2) I would like to call the release 3.0. Why? Because while
> spending the last ~1-2 months tracking down the cpu bug a whole lot
> of other work has gone into the kernel including major network
> protocol stack wo
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> Whatever happened to the old principle for three part numbers
>
> ..
>
> Bug fix releases bump the fix level, new features bump the feature
> level and zero the fix level, big changes that break backwards
> compatibility bum
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> I thought that a package that is listed in the repository but not available
> meant that it has been replaced by a new version, but there's no new version
> of the list.
The package isn't physically there in the repository - if you follow
th
That's weird, since you have a .git directory there. Google queries
suggest "rm .git/index && git reset" but that seems to be from
something that was fixed in an older version of Git.
You could delete the files in /usr/src, including the .git*
directories, and re-download using the Makefile in /u
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Vitaly Shevtsov wrote:
> Does DragonFly support USB 3.0?
Nope. :(
I just put these together. It's "RCa" because I haven't even tested
these in a VM yet, so hopefully they are... bootable? The next ones,
if made, will be 3.0-RCb. Please test, file bugs, you know what to
do.
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/iso-images/dfly-i386-3.0-RCa.iso.bz2
http://avalon.drago
I'm aiming to tag 3.0.1 this weekend and upload images. There's 5
bugs still linked on the catchall 3.0 ticket:
http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/2286
... but I don't think they are worth holding up the release. If
anyone wants to try to close them in the next 48 hours or so, please
do. We'r
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> There are 12 kde related packages in
>
> http://mirror-master.dragonflybsd.org/packages/x86_64/DragonFly-3.0/pkgsrc-2011Q4/All/
>
> but ,
>
> http://mirror-master.dragonflybsd.org/packages/x86_64/DragonFly-2.10.1/pkgsrc-2011Q2/All/
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:06 AM, David Crosswell
wrote:
> I can get these servers here:
>
> http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/docdisplay?lndocid=MIGR-45510
>
> ...for $10 each, or two for $15.
ATI Rage XL is I think an older chipset and should work well, if I'm
remembering correctly. I
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> I've noticed that the release images are already in place (I even
> downloaded one), but there is no formal announcement yet. The release
> notes date the release with February 21 (yesterday). What is the current
> status?
The images w
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/iso-images/dfly-x86_64-gui-3.0.1_REL.iso.bz2
>
> ISO GUI 3.0.1 x86_64 is NOT bootable :
>
> It is saying : .. kernel could not be found ...
> and asking a command to enter .
The x86_64 GUI ISO definite
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Zenny wrote:
> UPDATE: I also tried to install dfly-x86_64-3.0.1_REL.img with/without
> acpi and encryption of swap and root with HAMMER,
>
> With encryption, the installer stopped at 93% while creating newfs
> with a malloc error, while encrypting and
>
> Without
I just booted a new version of the GUI x86_64 ISO, with a patch from
Matt to fix the problem - it installed and worked. The problem was
that the ISO image was larger than 2G, which gave libstand issues.
It's copied up to crater and should be on mirror-master within a few hours.
Chances are good you already noticed, but: DragonFly 3.0 is released!
Check the release notes for details.
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/release30/
Download from a convenient mirror. We had issues with the inital
x86_64 GUI ISO image (file was over 2G when decompressed) but the ISO
there now will
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> Do you know where to get the dircolors program? I copied my bashrc from my
> Linux box and it has this code:
Does dircolors do something ls -G does not?
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Saturday, February 25, 2012 23:23:36 Justin Sherrill wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
>> > Do you know where to get the dircolors program? I copied my bashrc from
>> > my
>&g
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:17 AM, YOSHIDA Shigeru wrote:
> cd /usr/pkgsrc && git fetch origin
> remote: Counting objects: 1681874, done.
> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (931019/931019), done.
> fatal: read error: Connection reset by peer232.22 MiB | 157 KiB/s
> fatal: early EOF
> fatal: index-p
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Bob Gold wrote:
>
> some rss feed advertised dragonFly.
> so I burned a liveCD (64 bit stable)
>
> the documentation on this is sparse so...
> is there ANY GUI build into the LiveCD?
> if so how the heck do I invoke it?
If the liveCD file you used had 'gui' in th
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:51 AM, wrote:
> P.S. After the installation I ran 'make pkgsrc-create' like
> DragonFlyBSD online documentation suggests, and it has been running for
> about 2 days already. :D
> I can see a program with a command line:
> git index-pack --stdin -v --fix-thin --keep=f
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:07 AM, wrote:
> And also, somebody pointed out in this
> thread that the .tar archive with the pkgsrc tree may not align well
> with my current DragonFlyBSD version, or have I misunderstood something?
> Anyway, where can I download the archive with the pkgsrc tree?
ftp:/
I'll be darned if I can figure out why ruby-193 thinks it builds an
oddly-named library and then craps out.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 3.0/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2012-03-12 23:36
Build end: 2012-03-14 05:43
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.o
lang/ruby193-base is I thought fixed in pkgsrc-current, so either I
had an older flavor of pkgsrc-current downloaded when I started this,
or I screwed up.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 3.1/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2012-03-14 16:32
Build end: 2012-03-20 0
We still have binary pkgsrc packages for DragonFly for version
2.6/2.7, which date back to summer 2010. I want to remove them, but
the last time I brought up the idea I think someone needed older
packages for something where they couldn't build.
We're currently eating up 200+G of storage space fo
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Konrad Neuwirth wrote:
> Thu Mar 22 00:34:54 2012] [emerg] (78)Function not implemented: Couldn't
> create accept lock (/var/run/accept.lock.81125) (5)
>
> They both mean that apache doesn't start.
Don't know about the SSL error, but can the www user write to /v
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 3.1/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2012-03-20 02:35
Build end: 2012-03-23 10:18
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/bleeding-edge/20120320.0235/meta/report.html
Machine readable version:
http://avalon.dragon
3.0.2 is tagged and released. Images for 3.0.2 are also out, and
should be at most mirrors by now.
The major difference between 3.0.1 and 3.0.2 is I/O APIC is disabled
by default when running DragonFly in a virtual machine; some people
had booting issues with that on.
For a shortlog of changes:
Here's a plan of what I'm going to do in the next little while:
- We have 2.6 binary packages still available. I don't think anyone
is using them at this point, and building from source is still
possible even with these missing. I will delete them soon.
- The next quarterly release of pkgsrc, 2
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 22:39:22 Justin Sherrill wrote:
>> The people this would inconvenience is anyone upgrading from 3.0.1 or
>> 3.0.2 to 3.0.3; your binary package target would change to a newer
>> release
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Sly Midnight wrote:
> git branch DragonFly_RELEASE_3_0 v3.0.2
> git checkout v3.0.2
You almost had it:
git branch DragonFly_RELEASE_3_0 origin/DragonFly_RELEASE_3_0
git checkout DragonFly_RELEASE_3_0
These lines say "Attach a local branch to the origin's releas
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Konrad Neuwirth wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> the handbook on the website is very helpful in regards to jails, and I was
> able to set up a jail or three quite quickly following the instructions
> there. What I do not yet understand, though, is what the process wo
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Donald Allen wrote:
> I've installed Dragonfly 3.0.2 on an x86_64 box side-by-side with Arch
> Linux. Arch is set up for UTC time, America/New_York timezone. When I
> installed Dragonfly, I selected 'Yes' in response to the question "Is
> this machine's CMOS clock
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Tim Darby wrote:
> When I run hammer prune-everything remotely via SSH, it pretty consistently
> causes all network connections to that box to die, including my ssh session.
> Has anyone else seen this?
I have run prune-everything a bunch of times (since I manage
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> Do you know when the packages for 2012Q1 will be available?
>
> Pierre
64-bit build just finished this morning, so it'll be at least a day or
two for uploading. 32-bit build is on a machine that has crashed and
I don't have back up yet.
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Justin Sherrill
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
>> Do you know when the packages for 2012Q1 will be available?
>>
>> Pierre
>
> 64-bit build just finished this morning, so it'll be at least a day or
&g
It will
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Edward M wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 06:30 AM, Justin Sherrill wrote:
>>
>> I'd advise building from source instead of waiting for binaries at
>> this point for 2012Q1.
>
> This may sound like a noob question:-)
> Will 201
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 09:30:50 Justin Sherrill wrote:
>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Justin Sherrill
>>
>> wrote:
>> I'd advise building from source instead of waiting for binaries at
>> this point
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 21:06:14 Justin Sherrill wrote:
>> Are you asking about doing a full bulk build of all the packages, or
>> adding/upgrading packages on your system?
>
> Both. I'd like to upgrade the packages
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
