Hi,
The version of my DPDK is v19.02 .
Both my master and secondary are run with linux root ID.
First, I can successfully run a DPDK master process like:
dpdk_app -c f --file-prefix=mm --socket-mem=1024,1024
Then, I run the same app like:
dpdk_app -c f0 --file-prefix=ss --socket-mem=1024,1024
Do you mean all components must be built inside bazel?
>> Sort of. We have a project that is built on bazel. Now, we need to use the
>> core functions of DPDK to replace the network primitives in our project, so
>> that we can improve the performance of our project.
You are not able to call
11/03/2021 00:42, Jinkun Geng:
> For any project using bazel, if we want to use DPDK, then we need to compile
> DPDK stuff into bazel by ourselves. It is not a trivial thing and the
> bazelment (https://github.com/bazelment/dpdk) guys have spent much effort
> extracting the core files in DPDK
For any project using bazel, if we want to use DPDK, then we need to compile
DPDK stuff into bazel by ourselves. It is not a trivial thing and the bazelment
(https://github.com/bazelment/dpdk) guys have spent much effort extracting the
core files in DPDK and write the BUILD files for DPDK. But
09/03/2021 05:11, Jinkun Geng:
> Too bad. :<
Why is it too bad?
How the choice of an internal build system
can affect other projects?
From: Stephen Hemminger
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 01:32:16 +
> Jinkun Geng wrote:
>
> > Hi, all.
> > Since bazel building system is becoming more and more
