RE: mlx5 VF packet lost between rx_port_unicast_packets and rx_good_packets

2021-11-15 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Hi Asaf, Thanks for your quick answer. I’m trying to upgrade, will update you shortly. However I think from reading the full email thread https://inbox.dpdk.org/users/dm8pr12mb5494459b49353faccacef3c3cd...@dm8pr12mb5494.namprd12.prod.outlook.com/t/#mc9927dd8f5f092d5042d95fa520b29765d17ddf8 that

RE: mlx5 VF packet lost between rx_port_unicast_packets and rx_good_packets

2021-11-15 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Hi all, I hit the exact same problem reported by Yan. I’m using: * 2 Mellanox CX5 MT28800 installed on 2 different servers, connected together * Device FW (as reported by DPDK): 16.31.1014 * DPDK 19.11.5 (from 6WindGate actually) I sent roughly 360M packets from one server to the

Re: release schedule change proposal

2021-11-15 Thread Shepard Siegel
> Opinions? Atomic Rules has been releasing our Arkville product in lockstep with DPDK for the past 19 quarters. Our FPGA solution has the added burden of testing with async releases of FPGA vendor CAD tools. Although we have gotten used to the quarterly cadence, for the reasons given by Thomas

Re: release schedule change proposal

2021-11-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:58:15 +0100 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > For the last 5 years, DPDK was doing 4 releases per year, > in February, May, August and November (the LTS one): > .02 .05 .08 .11 (LTS) > > This schedule has multiple issues: > - clash with China's Spring Festival >

Re: release schedule change proposal

2021-11-15 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 15/11/2021 14:58, Thomas Monjalon wrote: For the last 5 years, DPDK was doing 4 releases per year, in February, May, August and November (the LTS one): .02 .05 .08 .11 (LTS) This schedule has multiple issues: - clash with China's Spring Festival - too many

Re: release schedule change proposal

2021-11-15 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 8:42 PM Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 15:58 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > For the last 5 years, DPDK was doing 4 releases per year, > > in February, May, August and November (the LTS one): > > .02 .05 .08 .11 (LTS) > > > > This schedule has

Re: release schedule change proposal

2021-11-15 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 15:58 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > For the last 5 years, DPDK was doing 4 releases per year, > in February, May, August and November (the LTS one): > .02 .05 .08 .11 (LTS) > > This schedule has multiple issues: > - clash with China's Spring Festival >

release schedule change proposal

2021-11-15 Thread Thomas Monjalon
For the last 5 years, DPDK was doing 4 releases per year, in February, May, August and November (the LTS one): .02 .05 .08 .11 (LTS) This schedule has multiple issues: - clash with China's Spring Festival - too many rushes, impacting maintainers & testers -

RE: Pdump Didn't capture the packet

2021-11-15 Thread Pattan, Reshma
From: 廖書華 Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 5:39 AM To: users@dpdk.org Cc: 林庭安 Subject: Pdump Didn't capture the packet Dear all, Currently, I want to use pdump to capture our DPDK application, however for the pdump side, unfortunately, didn't capture any packet, also pdump didn't print any