21/02/2022 21:10, Aaron Lee:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Actually I remembered in my previous setup I had run dpdk-devbind.py to
> bind the mlx5 NIC to igb_uio. I read somewhere that you don't need to do
> this and just wanted to confirm that this is correct.
Indeed, mlx5 PMD runs on top of mlx5 kernel
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 21:28:08 +0100
Staffan Wiklund wrote:
> Stephen, thanks for your answer.
> I realize the statement is very vague.
> I was thinking of if there was something common in the design of Intel and
> AMD CPUs respectively that has an impact on their use by DPDK applications.
> Do
Stephen, thanks for your answer.
I realize the statement is very vague.
I was thinking of if there was something common in the design of Intel and
AMD CPUs respectively that has an impact on their use by DPDK applications.
Do you know if there is such a common design difference between Intel and
Hi Thomas,
Actually I remembered in my previous setup I had run dpdk-devbind.py to
bind the mlx5 NIC to igb_uio. I read somewhere that you don't need to do
this and just wanted to confirm that this is correct.
Best,
Aaron
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:45 AM Aaron Lee wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I
Hi Thomas,
I tried installing things from scratch two days ago and have gotten
things working! I think part of the problem was figuring out the correct
hugepage allocation for my system. If I recall correctly, I tried setting
up my system with default page size 1G but perhaps didn't have enough
21/02/2022 19:52, Thomas Monjalon:
> 18/02/2022 22:12, Aaron Lee:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to get my ConnectX5 NIC working with DPDK v21.11 but I'm
> > wondering if the card I have simply isn't compatible. I first noticed that
> > the model I was given is MCX515A-CCA_Ax_Bx. Below are some of
18/02/2022 22:12, Aaron Lee:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get my ConnectX5 NIC working with DPDK v21.11 but I'm
> wondering if the card I have simply isn't compatible. I first noticed that
> the model I was given is MCX515A-CCA_Ax_Bx. Below are some of the error
> logs when running dpdk-pdump.
Hello,
I'm trying to get my ConnectX5 NIC working with DPDK v21.11 but I'm
wondering if the card I have simply isn't compatible. I first noticed that
the model I was given is MCX515A-CCA_Ax_Bx. Below are some of the error
logs when running dpdk-pdump.
EAL: Detected CPU lcores: 80
EAL: Detected
Thanks for the clarification!
I was able to get 148Mpps with 12 lcores after some BIOS tunings.
Looks like due to these HW limitations I have to use ring buffer as you
suggested to support more than 32 lcores!
пт, 18 февр. 2022 г. в 16:40, Dmitry Kozlyuk :
> Hi,
>
> > With more than 12 lcores
I get 125 Mpps from single port using 12 lcores:
numactl -N 1 -m 1 /opt/dpdk-21.11/build/app/dpdk-testpmd -l 64-127 -n 4 -a
:c1:00.0 -- --stats-period 1 --nb-cores=12 --rxq=12 --txq=12 --rxd=512
With 63 cores i get 35 Mpps:
numactl -N 1 -m 1 /opt/dpdk-21.11/build/app/dpdk-testpmd -l 64-127
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 16:14:26 +0100
Staffan Wiklund wrote:
> Hello
>
> Do you know if there is a difference in support for DPDK that is provided by
> Intel and AMD CPUs respectively?
>
> I talked to a person today claiming he has learned that Intel CPUs have
> been preferred over AMD CPUs for
Hello
Do you know if there is a difference in support for DPDK that is provided by
Intel and AMD CPUs respectively?
I talked to a person today claiming he has learned that Intel CPUs have
been preferred over AMD CPUs for some DPDK applications.
This person had no document showing reasons for
12 matches
Mail list logo
