Re: DPDK NIC - Firmware Comptability

28/03/2024 06:53, Pujar, Shyam: > Hi All , > I have question regarding DPDK NIC-Firmware version > compatibility. https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html. > I have highlighted the DPDK version in use. Does the following matrix > indicates that, "minimum version of Firmware or

Re: when link librte_net_mlx5.so and use gdb, my program can't get environment variable

Hello, We could dig in details what happens in constructors, but first I don't understand why you want to LD_PRELOAD some drivers. The DPDK drivers are already loaded dynamically with dlopen() from EAL. 04/12/2023 10:45, jiangheng (G): > Environment: > [root@localhost jh]# cat

Re: Direct Mem Pool vs Indirect mem pool creation

01/09/2023 14:47, omer yamac: > Hello, > > I need clarification while creating direct/indirect buffers for mbuf. I > couldn't find exact documentation, and I just looked over the fragmentation > test case and saw that two pools were created. One is a > direct pool, and the other is an indirect

Re: help

et3 PMD are ok? > > > > > > > > *From:* Igor de Paula > > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 25, 2023 8:42 PM > > *To:* Varghese, Vipin > > *Cc:* Yigit, Ferruh ; Jochen Behrens < > > jbehr...@vmware.com>; Thomas Monjalon ; > > users@dpdk.org; Gupta, Ni

Re: Supporting RSS with DPDK in a VM

Hello, You can have packets distributed to multiple queues without RSS. If you really wants to enable the RSS algorithms, it seems not supported for now with vhost_user. It can be enabled with vhost running in the kernel: https://qemu.readthedocs.io/en/latest/devel/ebpf_rss.html 26/07/2023

Re: Enable RSS for virtio application ( dpdk version 21.11)

You may need vhost running in the Linux kernel with some BPF code. There is a documentation about eBPF RSS: https://qemu.readthedocs.io/en/latest/devel/ebpf_rss.html 26/07/2023 09:32, shiv chittora: > Thanks Bing for quick response. > > The virtio driver version 1.0.0 is included in the Linux

Re: help

matter of BIOS settings for the IOMMU? > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:32 AM Thomas Monjalon > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +Cc the vmxnet3 maintainer. > > > > > > > > Please Jochen, do you have an idea what's wrong be

Re: help

20/07/2023 11:35, Igor de Paula: > The weird thing is that it only happens when I am using a host with an AMD > processor. It doesn't happen when I use a host with an Intel processor. So it's probably a matter of BIOS settings for the IOMMU? > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:32 AM Thomas

Re: help

+Cc the vmxnet3 maintainer. Please Jochen, do you have an idea what's wrong below? 20/07/2023 11:25, Igor de Paula: > This is because it can't negotiate the IOMMU type with any port. > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 5:08 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Hello, > > >

Re: help

Hello, The first error is "Cause: Error: number of ports must be even" 03/05/2023 18:13, Igor de Paula: > I am running a VM inside a VMWARE server (vSphere). > My goal it to set up DPDK with two HW ports, and set up a virtio_user to > interact with the kernel stack. > In another app I have it

Re: Generic flow string parser

This thread is an API suggestion, it should be discussed in the developer mailing list (did the Cc here). 29/04/2023 16:23, Cliff Burdick: > > Would rather the flow parser was rewritten as well. Doing open coded > > parser is much more error prone and hard to extend versus writing the > > parser

Re: Generic flow string parser

26/04/2023 07:47, David Marchand: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 6:47 AM Cliff Burdick wrote: > > > > Does anyone know if a generic parser for flow strings exists anywhere? The > > one inside of testpmd is ideal, but unfortunately it's self-contained and > > not distributed as part of a normal DPDK

Re: Running testpmd as non-root user with uio_pci_generic

14/01/2023 23:17, Isaac Boukris: > Hi, > > I tried to run testpmd as a non-root user with uio_pci_generic (i.e. > not vfio-pci) on a vmxnet3 interface by setting the > 'cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_admin' capabilities as according to the doc at: >

Re: USB device support in DPDK

02/12/2022 14:01, John Bize: > Will DPDK support USB-Ethernet devices? If there is a need and an advantage for USB devices to be supported in DPDK, why not? In general, DPDK supports what is contributed and maintained.

Re: OpenWRT Related Question

21/07/2022 03:08, R T: > On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 06:03:32 AM EDT, Thomas Monjalon > wrote: > > > We have this howto page about OpenWRT: > > https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/howto/openwrt.html > > I am not sure how much it is up to date, > > please

Re: OpenWRT Related Question

Hello, 20/07/2022 06:15, R T: > Hello Folks,I've been writing a small application on Ubuntu 20.04 that uses > DPDK. I started with some of the simpler examples such as l2fwd and > packet_ordering and added some other function I wanted to experiment with. > I'm getting good packet throughput

Re: Fwd: QOS sample example.

+Cc QoS scheduler maintainers (see file MAINTAINERS) 31/03/2022 18:59, satish amara: > Hi, > I am trying to understand the QOS sample scheduler application code. > Trying to understand what is tc_period in the config. > 30. QoS Scheduler Sample Application — Data Plane Development Kit 21.05.0

Re: ConnectX5 Setup with DPDK

25/02/2022 19:29, Aaron Lee: > Hi Thomas, > > I was doing some more testing and wanted to increase the RX queues for the > CX5 but was wondering how I could do that. I see in the usage example in > the docs, I could pass in --rxq=2 --txq=2 to set the queues to 2 each but I > don't see that in my

Re: ConnectX5 Setup with DPDK

ports number, the last port > > will pair with itself. > > > > Configuring Port 0 (socket 1) > > Port 0: EC:0D:9A:68:21:A8 > > Checking link statuses... > > Done > > testpmd> show port summary all > > Number of available ports: 1 > > Port MAC Add

Re: ConnectX5 Setup with DPDK

21/02/2022 19:52, Thomas Monjalon: > 18/02/2022 22:12, Aaron Lee: > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to get my ConnectX5 NIC working with DPDK v21.11 but I'm > > wondering if the card I have simply isn't compatible. I first noticed that > > the model I was given is

Re: ConnectX5 Setup with DPDK

18/02/2022 22:12, Aaron Lee: > Hello, > > I'm trying to get my ConnectX5 NIC working with DPDK v21.11 but I'm > wondering if the card I have simply isn't compatible. I first noticed that > the model I was given is MCX515A-CCA_Ax_Bx. Below are some of the error > logs when running dpdk-pdump.

Re: Initial Setup and best practices

13/02/2022 18:37, Simon Brown: > Hello, Hello > I'm new to DPDK and I'm trying to setup a simple project to count packets. > I'm > using MoonGen to generate the traffic on one machine and can receive the data > using traditional sockets on another machine. So I know that part works. > > I've

Re: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices

+Cc mlx5 experts 14/01/2022 11:10, Rocio Dominguez: > Hi, > > I'm doing a setup with Mellanox ConnectX-4 (MCX416A-CCA) NICs. > > I'm using: > > OS SLES 15 SP2 > DPDK 19.11.4 (the official supported version for SLES 15 SP2) > MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.5-1.0.3.2-sles15sp2-x86_64 (the latest one) >

release schedule change proposal

For the last 5 years, DPDK was doing 4 releases per year, in February, May, August and November (the LTS one): .02 .05 .08 .11 (LTS) This schedule has multiple issues: - clash with China's Spring Festival - too many rushes, impacting maintainers & testers -

Re: Enable RX interrupts

01/11/2021 09:56, Jack Humphries: > Hi Dmitry, > > Thanks for the quick response! Yes, I was calling rte_eth_dev_rx_intr_enable > — I just tried re-arming interrupts before each call to epoll and my initial > experiment shows that fixes the issue. > > You are right that l3fwd-power does the

Re: [dpdk-dev] Doubt regarding DPDK hash Library implementation

04/11/2021 17:39, Medvedkin, Vladimir: > >> 01/11/2021 11:55, Syam Prasad N Pearson: > >>> /** Number of items per bucket. */ > >>> *#define RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES 8* > >>> > >>> defined inside: > >>> dpdk-20.11.3/dpdk-stable-20.11.3/lib/librte_hash /rte_cuckoo_hash.h > >>> > >>> Why does the

Re: [dpdk-dev] Doubt regarding DPDK hash Library implementation

+Cc hash lib maintainers 01/11/2021 11:55, Syam Prasad N Pearson: > Dear Sir/Madam, > I am a developer trying to get familiar with the DPDK hash library. I tried > to make and use a hash table successfully. > During the development I came across a variable > > /** Number of items per bucket. */

Re: Troubles with building of DPDK.RPM and meson

12/10/2021 08:45, Ruslan R. Laishev: > Hello All! > > I have a small study task to make DPDK.RPM with the latest DPDK from > the git. You should look at what is done in Fedora for the latest DPDK. > I use DPDK.SPEC from the latest .SRC.RPM kit as a template. Not sure what is your

Re: I need DPDK MLX5 Probe error support

[0x7f56c229018b] tid=1377, > /lib64/libc.so.6(abort+0x175) [0x7f56c2291585] tid=1377, > /usr/local/bin/ericsson-packet-processor(main+0x458) [0x406818] tid=1377, > /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xed) [0x7f56c227b34d] tid=1377, > /usr/local/bin/ericsson-packet-processor(_start+0x2a) [

Re: I need DPDK MLX5 Probe error support

bles MLX5 support if needed dependencies are available. > > BR/Jaeeun > > -----Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Sunday, October 3, 2021 4:51 PM > To: Jaeeun Ham > Cc: users@dpdk.org; alia...@nvidia.com; rasl...@nvidia.com; as...@nvidia.com > Subject: Re

Re: I need DPDK MLX5 Probe error support

you in advance. > > BR/Jaeeun > > -Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Sunday, October 3, 2021 4:51 PM > To: Jaeeun Ham > Cc: users@dpdk.org; alia...@nvidia.com; rasl...@nvidia.com; as...@nvidia.com > Subject: Re: I need DPDK MLX5 Probe error supp

Re: I need DPDK MLX5 Probe error support

03/10/2021 10:10, Jaeeun Ham: > Hi Thomas, > > Thank you so much for your sincere support. > I will follow your suggestion and do my best to solve this issue. > > By the way, is it okay to use mlx5_core driver by different applications > which have different DPDK versions? > :12:01.0 (DPDK

Re: I need DPDK MLX5 Probe error support

$(get_dpdk_core_list_parameter) \ > $(get_dpdk_mem_parameter) \ > $(get_dpdk_hugepage_parameters) \ > -d /usr/local/lib/librte_mempool_ring.so \ > -d /usr/local/lib/librte_mempool_stack.so \ > -d /usr/local/lib/librte_net_pcap.so \ > -d /usr/local/lib/librte_net_i40e.so \

Re: [dpdk-users] Memory allocation limits

29/09/2021 14:43, Burakov, Anatoly: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 29/09/2021 12:14, Burakov, Anatoly: > > > From: Thomas Monjalon > > > > 26/09/2021 17:52, Mohammad Masumi: > > > > > I have HP server with 768GB memory 384GB in each Numa but I can't &g

Re: I need DPDK MLX5 Probe error support

27/09/2021 02:18, Jaeeun Ham: > Hi, > > I hope you are well. > My name is Jaeeun Ham and I have been working for the Ericsson. > > I am suffering from enabling MLX5 NIC, so could you take a look at how to run > it? > There are two pci address for the SRIOV(vfio) mlx5 nic support but it doesn't

Re: [dpdk-users] Memory allocation limits

29/09/2021 12:14, Burakov, Anatoly: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 26/09/2021 17:52, Mohammad Masumi: > > > Hi > > > > > > I have HP server with 768GB memory 384GB in each Numa but I can't > > > allocate more than 64GB by rte_malloc by changing some

Re: [dpdk-users] can we reserve hugepage and not release

29/09/2021 12:16, Burakov, Anatoly: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 18/09/2021 04:37, Jiany Wu: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I met a scenario that, need to start and stop the container many times > > > for the hugepage. But after several times container s

Re: Issues Cross compiling DPDK

27/09/2021 17:45, Ginés García Avilés: > Hi, > I'm trying to cross-compile DPDK using the information provided > here (56. Installing DPDK Using the meson build system — Data Plane > Development Kit 21.11.0-rc0 documentation > ) but,

Re: [dpdk-users] what's the cache size of rte_mempool_create()?

+Cc mempool maintainers 08/09/2021 11:18, topperxin: > HI list > A question about the value of cache size of rte_mempool_crate() > function, the defination of this function like below: > > > struct rte_mempool * > > rte_mempool_create(const char *name, unsigned n, unsigned

Re: [dpdk-users] pktgen-dpdk failed to load LUA script

+Cc the maintainer 10/09/2021 09:34, Kevin Chen (陳奕儒) : 8553: > Dear DPDK Community, > > I'm trying to execute the LUA script with the following command. > # usr/local/bin/pktgen -l 0-2 -- -T -P -m 1.0,2.1 -f test/hello-world.lua > > But the LUA script is not executed with this message. > >>>

Re: [dpdk-users] pktgen not showing any capture.

+Cc dpdk-pktgen maintainer 10/09/2021 12:02, Filip Janiszewski: > Hi, > > While attempting to capture with pktgen, I see the counter > rx_steer_missed_packets increasing in ethtool and nothing being captured. > > in pktgen 'page stats' is always empty and 'page xstats' shows something > is

Re: [dpdk-users] MLX ConnectX-4 Discarding packets

Great, thanks for the update! 12/09/2021 11:32, Filip Janiszewski: > Alright, nailed it down to a wrong preferred PCIe device in the BIOS > configuration, it has not been changed after the NIC have been moved to > another PCIe slot. > > Now the EPYC is going really great, getting 100Gbps rate

Re: [dpdk-users] SW Turbo Poll Mode Driver

+Cc maintainer 14/09/2021 12:58, Ginés García Avilés: > Hi all, > After following the steps listed here (3. SW Turbo Poll Mode Driver — Data > Plane Development Kit 21.08.0 documentation (dpdk.org) > ), using the specific > versions of > DPDK and

Re: [dpdk-users] EAL: Failed to attach device on primary process error in dpdk 21.08

15/09/2021 16:08, animesh tripathi: > Hi Team, > > I am migrating from dpdk 19.11 to dpdk 21.08 for my application and I am > getting the following error while executing the binary: > > *EAL: Failed to attach device on primary process* > > Can anyone please help me out here in understanding the

Re: [dpdk-users] [Broadcom BNXT] Link event not working

17/09/2021 14:39, Antoine POLLENUS: > Hi, > > I'm experiencing some issues with a Broadcom P225P and DPDK in 19.11.3 > version. > > We register a handler to take care of the link status as specified in the > DPDK documentation. > > But with this specific board the event is never triggered. I

Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK CPU selection criteria?

17/09/2021 17:23, Jared Brown: > Hello everybody! > > Is there some canonical resource or at least a recommendation on how to > evaluate different CPUs for suitability for use with DPDK? There are some performance reports with details: https://core.dpdk.org/perf-reports/ It is difficult to

Re: [dpdk-users] can we reserve hugepage and not release

18/09/2021 04:37, Jiany Wu: > Hello, > > I met a scenario that, need to start and stop the container many times for > the hugepage. But after several times container start and stop, the > hugepage is not able to reserve. > Hugepage size is 2MB, and HW only support 2MB, can't support 1GB. > Is

Re: [dpdk-users] TX/RX adapter running on the same core problem

+Cc eventdev maintainers 26/09/2021 07:21, Jaeeun Ham: > Hi, > > I hope you are well. > > During the traffic test, TX adapter showed starvation due to Rx adapter > processing on the same dpdk-core 03 and dropped the 41412 packets after > 154655 tx_retry. > So, I expect I have to assign TX/RX

Re: [dpdk-users] Memory allocation limits

26/09/2021 17:52, Mohammad Masumi: > Hi > > I have HP server with 768GB memory 384GB in each Numa but I can't allocate > more than 64GB by rte_malloc by changing some parameters in rte_config.h it > increased to 128GB > How to increase heap size? adding people Cc to help

Re: Using rte_flow to distribute single flow type among multiple Rx queues using DPDK in Mellanox ConnectX-5 Ex

29/09/2021 07:26, Anna A: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use rte_flow_action_type_rss to distribute packets all of the > same flow type among multiple Rx queues on a single port. Mellanox > ConnectX-5 Ex and DPDK version 20.05 is used for this purpose. It doesn't > seem to work and all the packets are

Re: [dpdk-users] [DISCUSSION] code snippet documentation

15/07/2021 09:01, Asaf Penso: > Hello DPDK community, > > I would like to bring up a discussion about a way to have code snippets as an > example for proper usage. > The DPDK tree is filled with great pieces of code that are well documented > and maintained in high quality. > I feel we are a

[dpdk-users] new IRC channel

As agreed in a Technical Board meeting, the preferred IRC channel for the DPDK project moved from freenode to Libera.Chat: https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-July/214662.html The website is updated: https://core.dpdk.org/contribute/ There is a good guide to start with

Re: [dpdk-users] Question regarding DPDK on AWS

30/06/2021 16:40, Antonis Christodoulou: > Hello all, Hello, > my name is Antonis Christodoulou, and I am a new user of DPDK. I am not sure > this is the right place to ask a usage question, so please feel free to > redirect me to someone more appropriate for such questions as needed. Your

Re: [dpdk-users] Unable to setup hugepages

31/05/2021 17:35, Gabriel Danjon: > Hello, > > After successfully installed the DPDK 20.11 on my Centos 8-Stream > (minimal), I am trying to configure the hugepages but encounters a lot > of difficulties. There's some confusing info below. Let's forget all the details and focus on simple

Re: [dpdk-users] Enable to install DPDK on Centos 8-Stream

27/05/2021 18:10, Gabriel Danjon: > Hello, > > I am having difficulties to compile and install DPDK from sources on the > latest Centos 8-Stream. Did you compile and install DPDK successfully? Where is it installed? > > After having installed the required drivers and libraries, following the

Re: [dpdk-users] All links down with Chelsio T6 NICs

+Cc Chelsio maintainer 09/04/2021 19:24, Danushka Menikkumbura: > Hello, > > When I run testpmd on a system with 2 two-port Chelsio T6 NICs, the link > status is down for all four ports. I use igb_uio as the kernel driver. > Below is my testpmd commandline and the startup log. > > sudo

Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-ci] Integration of DPDK into Bazel

if you find new volunteers, it will not be always up-to-date. You should look for how to link an existing library from bazel. > From: Thomas Monjalon > 11/03/2021 00:42, Jinkun Geng: > > For any project using bazel, if we want to use DPDK, then we need to > > compile DPDK stuf

Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-ci] Integration of DPDK into Bazel

ilt inside bazel? You are not able to call meson/ninja commands from bazel? How do you do with other libraries? Does bazel usually reimplement what is packaged with autotools? > ________ From: Thomas Monjalon > 09/03/2021 05:11, Jinkun Geng: > > Too bad. :< >

Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-ci] Integration of DPDK into Bazel

09/03/2021 05:11, Jinkun Geng: > Too bad. :< Why is it too bad? How the choice of an internal build system can affect other projects? From: Stephen Hemminger > On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 01:32:16 + > Jinkun Geng wrote: > > > Hi, all. > > Since bazel building system is becoming more and more

Re: [dpdk-users] MLX5: Using packet send scheduling / packet pacing

30/01/2021 11:54, Carsten Andrich: > Hi Slava, > > thank you for the prompt response. I think the requirements for Packet > Pacing should be added to Table 34.2(?) of the MLX5 docs [1]. +1 for improving the doc

Re: [dpdk-users] MLX5: Using packet send scheduling / packet pacing

+Cc Slava 29/01/2021 17:30, Carsten Andrich: > Hello everyone, > > I'm trying to use packet send scheduling [1] with DPDK 20.11 and the > MLX5 PMD (NIC: ConnectX-5 MCX516A-CDAT). This patch contains some > additional information on this feature also know as packet pacing [2]. > > According to

Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK: MPLS packet processing

18/01/2021 09:46, Raslan Darawsheh: > From: raktim bhatt > > > Hi All, > > > > I am trying to build a multi-RX-queue dpdk program, using RSS to split the > > incoming traffic into RX queues on a single port. Mellanox ConnectX-5 and > > DPDK Version 19.11 is used for this purpose. It works fine

Re: [dpdk-users] Does vmxnet3 PMD supports LSC=1 ?

+Cc Yong Wang, maintainer of this PMD. 14/01/2021 18:30, madhukar mythri: > Hi, > > Does vmxnet3 PMD support LSC=1(i.e with interrupt mode) for link changes ? > > When i enable LSC=1 the functionality works fine, but, when pumping traffic > i'm seeing increasing in CPU load on some cores which

Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK 20.11 MLX5 testpmd tx_pp 'WQE index ignore feature is required for packet pacing'

11/12/2020 17:19, Slava Ovsiienko: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 09/12/2020 17:03, Alessandro Pagani: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I am trying to run dpdk testpmd with Mellanox ConnectX4 Lx (mlx5 driver). > > > > > > I am specifying the tx_pp

Re: [dpdk-users] Questions about public IP included in DPDK driver code

+Cc ark maintainers 07/12/2020 15:17, HuangLiming: > I found that the driver contains public IP(169.254.10.240), which leads to my > binary > with public IP too, which is not what I want. > What is the function of this IP, and could the community delete it for > security reasons? > >

Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK 20.11 MLX5 testpmd tx_pp 'WQE index ignore feature is required for packet pacing'

09/12/2020 17:03, Alessandro Pagani: > Hi all, > > I am trying to run dpdk testpmd with Mellanox ConnectX4 Lx (mlx5 driver). > > I am specifying the tx_pp parameter to provide the packet send scheduling > on mbuf timestamps, but the testpmd fails with the following error: [...] > EAL: Probe PCI

Re: [dpdk-users] Changes to DPDK kmod drivers / backward compatibility within LTS rel.

24/09/2020 19:12, Alexander Kotliarov: > Hi there! > I would like to find out what is the policy regarding changes to the DPDK's > kmod drivers such as igb_uio.ko within a DPDK's LTS release. Are these > changes backward compatible? > For example, is there a guarantee that an application built >

Re: [dpdk-users] Error while building DPDK version 19.11 over latest kernel version

01/10/2020 19:04, Klei rama: > Hei, > > I am trying to build DPDK version 19.11 in my ubuntu machine (18.04) with > the latest kernel version 5.9. It gives me an error while I try to build > it. The error is when I try to build linux/kni module. > The error looks something like this: > >

Re: [dpdk-users] Resolved Issues per release

12/08/2020 15:32, Jim Holland (jimholla): > The release notes at https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-20.02/rel_notes/index.html > don't list the resolved issues/bugs. Is there a way to find what bugs are > resolved for each dpdk release? When looking at the git history, every commit fixing a bug should

Re: [dpdk-users] meson: is there a mechanism for controlling compilation configuration

29/07/2020 09:20, Chengchang Tang: > Hi, > DPDK with 'make' will be deprecated in a future release. I have some > questions about using meson to build DPDK. > > When using the make, we can change the macros in config/common_base to > control the compiling macros. For example, if i want to debug

Re: [dpdk-users] Trouble Building DPDK with MLNX OFED(4.4) Works with 5.0

S,18.11 > LTS and 17.11 LTS as I shared in the previous mail. You are mixing different versions of drivers. Choose either rdma-core packaged in Ubuntu, or OFED from mellanox.com. > I hope this answers your questions. > > Vineeth > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 3:13 PM Thomas

Re: [dpdk-users] Trouble Building DPDK with MLNX OFED(4.4) Works with 5.0

Hi, 06/06/2020 21:43, Vineeth Thapeta: > Hi guys, > > I had to roll back OFED version from 5.0 to 4.4 because another library > Moongen has trouble building with OFED 5.0. How Moongen is related to OFED? Why using OFED and not upstream packaging of rdma-core? Which distribution are you using?

Re: [dpdk-users] mlx5 PMD fails to receive certain icmpv6 multicast

26/03/2020 22:11, Thomas Monjalon: > 06/03/2020 01:45, Liwu Liu: > > Hi Team, > > > > I am using the mlx5/100G in KVM guest. The host shows this PCI vfNIC is > > provisioned to the guest: > > "17:01.1 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies M

Re: [dpdk-users] [mlx5 + DPDK 19.11] Flow insertion rate less than 4K per sec

. > > ``` > sudo ./flow_perf -l 3-7 -n 4 -w 02:00.0,dv_flow_en=1 -- --ingress --ether > --ipv4 --udp --queue --flows-count=10 > ``` > gives > > ``` > :: Total flow insertion rate -> 0.949381 K/Sec > :: The time for creating 10 in flows 105.331842 seconds > ::

Re: [dpdk-users] [mlx5 + DPDK 19.11] Flow insertion rate less than 4K per sec

Hi, 10/04/2020 20:11, Yan Lei: > I am doing some study that requires inserting more than 1 million flow > rules per second to the NIC. And I runs DPDK 19.11 on a ConnectX-5 NIC. > > But I only managed to create around 3.3K rules per second. > Below is the code I used to measure the insertion

Re: [dpdk-users] General Questions

09/04/2020 17:32, Stephen Hemminger: > On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 20:57:19 +0530 > Shyam Shrivastav wrote: > > > From my experience as dpdk user > > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Cristofer Martins < > > cristofermart...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Well the reason i thought about using

Re: [dpdk-users] CX4-Lx VF link status in Azure

27/03/2020 18:26, Benoit Ganne (bganne): > > Unfortunately the reason was not documented. > > I suggest we go with a patch from your understanding > > and we'll test it in multiple conditions to validate nothing is broken. > > Done: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-March/161096.html Very

Re: [dpdk-users] CX4-Lx VF link status in Azure

27/03/2020 11:02, Benoit Ganne (bganne): > > Second, as Benoit said, we should relax this requirement. > > If the link speed is unknown, a second request can be tried, no more. > > Benoit, feel free to submit a patch showing how you think it should > > behave. > > Otherwise, I guess a maintainer

Re: [dpdk-users] CX4-Lx VF link status in Azure

On 3/26/2020 12:00, Benoit Ganne (bganne) wrote: > Just removing the over-strict check in mlx5 PMD is enough for everything to > work fine: > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/26152/1/build/external/patches/dpdk_20.02/0002-mlx5-azure-workaround.patch [...] > 2) mlx5 PMD enforce that both link speed

Re: [dpdk-users] mlx5 PMD fails to receive certain icmpv6 multicast

06/03/2020 01:45, Liwu Liu: > Hi Team, > > I am using the mlx5/100G in KVM guest. The host shows this PCI vfNIC is > provisioned to the guest: > "17:01.1 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27800 Family > [ConnectX-5 Virtual Function]" > > I am using DPDK 19.11 with kind of

Re: [dpdk-users] rte_eth_stats_get: imiss is not set when using mlx4/mlx5 driver

Hi, Sorry for the late answer. 22/10/2019 10:38, guyifan: > DPDK version 18.11.2，imiss is always 0. > And I could not find any code about 'imiss' in > 'dpdk-stable-18.11.2/drivers/net/mlx5/' or > 'dpdk-stable-18.11.2/drivers/net/mlx4/'. > Is there any way to know how many packets have been

Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK TX problems

Thanks for the interesting feedback. It seems we should test this performance use case in our labs. 18/02/2020 09:36, Hrvoje Habjanic: > On 08. 04. 2019. 11:52, Hrvoje Habjanić wrote: > > On 29/03/2019 08:24, Hrvoje Habjanić wrote: > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> I did write an application using dpdk

Re: [dpdk-users] CX4-Lx VF link status in Azure

26/03/2020 21:09, Mark Bloch: > > On 3/26/2020 12:00, Benoit Ganne (bganne) wrote: > >> Pasting back this important info: > >> " > >> Note that ethtool and '/sys/class/net//speed' also fails > >> to report the link speed (but not the link status). > >> " > >> > >> 26/03/2020 19:27, Benoit Ganne

Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Issue with DCB with X710 Quad 10Gb NIC

18/09/2019 09:02, Zhang, Xiao: > > There is some hardware limitation and need to enable RSS to distribute > packets for X710. Is this limitation documented?

Re: [dpdk-users] devargs syntax to use MAC address for bond slaves

19/08/2019 17:56, Greg O'Rawe: > Hi, > > Thanks for the reply. Is such a patch to the bonding PMD feasible? Probably yes. You can try to do it, and work with Chas for help.

Re: [dpdk-users] devargs syntax to use MAC address for bond slaves

+Cc Chas, the maintainer of the bonding PMD 10/08/2019 18:42, Thomas Monjalon: > Hi, > > 08/08/2019 18:28, Greg O'Rawe: > > Hi, > > > > I'm using DPDK 17.11.5 to bond two interfaces via the vdev syntax, however > > the two interfaces are on the same N

Re: [dpdk-users] devargs syntax to use MAC address for bond slaves

Hi, 08/08/2019 18:28, Greg O'Rawe: > Hi, > > I'm using DPDK 17.11.5 to bond two interfaces via the vdev syntax, however > the two interfaces are on the same NIC and share the same PCI address. > > Is there a way to reference them using the devargs syntax by MAC address? It > is discussed here

Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK MLX5 Probe error

Hi, 03/04/2019 20:32, Mora Gamboa, Luis Eduardo: > I'm not able to use the mlx5 pmd driver with some Mellanox NICs I have > installed on my server. The error I'm receiving during EAL initialization is: > > et_mlx5: no Verbs device matches PCI device :03:00.0, are kernel drivers > loaded? >

Re: [dpdk-users] Suggestion: DPDK "latest" Download Links

22/08/2018 11:58, Ferruh Yigit: > On 8/20/2018 8:03 PM, Justin Parus wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose adding DPDK "latest" download links. For example > > dpdk-latest-major and dpdk-latest-stable, would automatically update and > > point to the most recent date major and stable

Re: [dpdk-users] Apply patches from the mailing list

25/03/2018 16:31, long...@viettel.com.vn: > From: "shreyansh jain" > > From: long...@viettel.com.vn > > > A very basic question, but how do I apply some of the patches that > > > were put on the dev mailing list to try it out? I already looked at > > > the next- subtrees

Re: [dpdk-users] Using Mellanox ConnectX-3 for DPDK

Hi, 06/02/2018 00:01, Rohan Gandhi: > Hello All, > > 1) I am trying to use Mellanox ConnectX-3 to use DPDK on my server > (Ubuntu 16.04 kernel 4.13.0-32-generic). > > 2) Using dpdk/usertools/dpdk-setup.sh, I can see that the Mellanox > interface is dpdk compatible. > > Network devices using

Re: [dpdk-users] Does BONDING_MODE_8023AD is works in 17.11?

No reply after 2 months, adding maintainer Cc. 17/11/2017 23:24, Алексей Телятников: > Greetings. I have issue with link-aggregation in DPDK. My HP A5820X > switch does not recive LACP from DPDK application. > > Has anyone worked with BONDING_MODE_8023AD? > > I have: DPDK 17.11 HEAD &

Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK mlx4 PMD on Azure VM

19/12/2017 08:14, Hui Ling: > I installed DPDK 17.11 on Ubuntu 16.04. And I downloaded MLNX OFED > 4.2-1.2.0.0 and installed up-stream libs with > ./mlnxofedinstall --guest --dpdk --upstream-libs > > MLX4 PMD in DPDK doesn't seem to work with lib from ubuntu repository > and install OFED allows

Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK mlx4 PMD on Azure VM

Hi, 19/12/2017 08:14, Hui Ling: > I installed DPDK 17.11 on Ubuntu 16.04. And I downloaded MLNX OFED > 4.2-1.2.0.0 and installed up-stream libs with > ./mlnxofedinstall --guest --dpdk --upstream-libs > > MLX4 PMD in DPDK doesn't seem to work with lib from ubuntu repository > and install OFED

Re: [dpdk-users] attach/detach on secondary process

13/12/2017 22:10, Stephen Hemminger: > On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 22:00:48 +0100 > Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: > > > 13/12/2017 18:09, Stephen Hemminger: > > > Many DPDK drivers require that setup and initialization be done by > > > the primary p

Re: [dpdk-users] attach/detach on secondary process

13/12/2017 18:09, Stephen Hemminger: > Many DPDK drivers require that setup and initialization be done by > the primary process. This is mostly to avoid dealing with concurrency since > there can be multiple secondary processes. I think we should consider this limitation as a bug. We must allow a

Re: [dpdk-users] VF RSS availble in I350-T2?

12/12/2017 13:58, ..: > I assume my message was ignored due to it not being related to dpdk > software? It is ignored because people have not read it or are not expert in this hardware. I am CC'ing the maintainer of igb/e1000. > On 11 December 2017 at 10:14, .. wrote: > >

Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK Performance tips

13/12/2017 09:14, Anand Prasad: > Hi Dpdk team, >Can anyone please share tips to get better DPDK performance? I have tried > to run DPDK test applications on various PC configurations with different CPU > Speeds, RAM Size/Speed and and PCIex16 2nd and 3rd generation connections... > but I

Re: [dpdk-users] [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage

Hi, It is an error on DPDK side. It seems the tarball for DPDK 17.08 has been overwritten by the stable release process. I have restored the original tarball and we are checking what went wrong. fast.dpdk.org is a CDN for static.dpdk.org. It may take time to get the restored tarball on all CDN

Re: [dpdk-users] Building mlx4 drivers

Hi, 07/11/2017 21:49, Michael Sowka: > Hello, I am experiencing some early difficulties in building the mlx4 > driver for a ConnectX-3 device. Which version of DPDK? [...] > Again, i'm sticking with docs to not install anything outside of what > MLNX_OFED provides in its packages, but where is

  1   2   >