Hi Vijay,
>
> I am running the test pipeline application using extendible bucket hash table
> with 16 byte key size. I have made changes to the test pipeline application
> such that for EVERY port instance there are 3 cores: Rx Core, Worker Core
> and Tx Core instead of ALL ports mapping to a
Hi Matheus,
> -Original Message-
> From: users [mailto:users-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Matheus
> Salgueiro Castanho
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:11 PM
> To: users at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-users] Problems running ip_pipeline on VM
>
> Hi all,
>
> We've been having
> -Original Message-
> From: users [mailto:users-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Gadre Nayan
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 4:42 PM
> To: users at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-users] Tracking pipeline ports.
>
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to understand the purpose of the f_track function.
>
> In
Hi Matheus,
> -Original Message-
> From: users [mailto:users-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Matheus
> Salgueiro Castanho
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 3:40 PM
> To: users at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-users] Troube with firewall configuration in ip_pipeline
>
> Hello everyone,
>
>
Hi Biju,
Please see inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: users [mailto:users-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Talukdar, Biju
> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 4:09 PM
> To: users
> Subject: [dpdk-users] DPDK IP Pipeline query
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I have one question regarding DPDK IP
Hi Bradley
> -Original Message-
> From: users [mailto:users-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bradley Kite
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 5:32 PM
> To: users at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-users] Ability to clear/reset pipeline table?
>
> Hi there,
>
> The application I am writing needs to
Hi Kapil,
> -Original Message-
> From: users [mailto:users-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Kapil
> Adhikesavalu
> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 8:29 AM
> To: users at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-users] DPDK QOS
>
> Hello,
>
> I currently receive both control and data traffic on my
Hi Nidhia,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nidhia Varghese
> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 10:07 AM
> To: d...@dpdk.org; users@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Working of pipeline in a given config file and regarding
> user-defined actions in
Hi Nidhia,
On 10/04/2017 08:27, Nidhia Varghese wrote:
Hi Jasvinder,
Thanks for your help.
What I understood from the programmer's guide is that, port action
handler can be assigned to each input/output port to define actions to
be executed on each input packet that is received by the port.
Hi Nidhia,
What command should be used to add existing flow.txt file to the flow table.
What command should be used if we want to add new entry through CLI and not
through file?
I tried as shown below. and its giving error:
pipeline> p 1 flow add qinq bulk ./config/flow.txt
Command "flow add
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Barbette
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 3:27 PM
> Cc: Singh, Jasvinder ; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> ; users@dpdk.org
> Subject: SoftNIC usage / segfault?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a little bit puzzled by the SoftNIC d
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Barbette
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 9:31 AM
> To: Singh, Jasvinder
> Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian ; users@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: SoftNIC usage / segfault?
>
> Le 29/04/2020 à 18:21, Singh, Jasvinder a écrit :
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: users On Behalf Of Alex Kiselev
> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2020 12:12 PM
> To: users@dpdk.org
> Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] scheduler issue
>
> On 2020-11-25 16:04, Alex Kiselev wrote:
> > On 2020-11-24 16:34, Alex Kiselev
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Kiselev
> Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 10:46 AM
> To: Singh, Jasvinder
> Cc: users@dpdk.org; Dumitrescu, Cristian ;
> Dharmappa, Savinay
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] scheduler issue
>
> On 2020-12-07 11
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Kiselev
> Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 4:50 PM
> To: Singh, Jasvinder
> Cc: users@dpdk.org; Dumitrescu, Cristian ;
> Dharmappa, Savinay
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] scheduler issue
>
> On 2020-12-07 12:32, Singh, Jasvinde
> On 7 Dec 2020, at 22:16, Alex Kiselev wrote:
>
> On 2020-12-07 21:34, Alex Kiselev wrote:
>> On 2020-12-07 20:29, Singh, Jasvinder wrote:
>>>> On 7 Dec 2020, at 19:09, Alex Kiselev wrote:
>>>> On 2020-12-07 20:07, Alex Kiselev wrote:
>>
> > [JS] now, returning to 1 mbps pipes situation, try reducing tc period
> > first at subport and then at pipe level, if that help in getting even
> > traffic across low bandwidth pipes.
>
> reducing subport tc from 10 to 5 period also solved the problem with 1
> Mbit/s pipes.
>
> so, my
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Kiselev
> Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 1:42 PM
> To: Singh, Jasvinder
> Cc: users@dpdk.org; Dumitrescu, Cristian ;
> Dharmappa, Savinay
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] scheduler issue
>
> On 2020-12-08 14
> On 11 Dec 2020, at 22:27, Alex Kiselev wrote:
>
> On 2020-12-11 23:06, Singh, Jasvinder wrote:
>>>> On 11 Dec 2020, at 21:29, Alex Kiselev wrote:
>>> On 2020-12-08 14:24, Singh, Jasvinder wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > [JS] now,
> On 11 Dec 2020, at 21:29, Alex Kiselev wrote:
>
> On 2020-12-08 14:24, Singh, Jasvinder wrote:
>>
>>> > [JS] now, returning to 1 mbps pipes situation, try reducing tc period
>>> > first at subport and then at pipe level, if that help in getting
On 11 Dec 2020, at 23:37, Alex Kiselev wrote:
On 2020-12-11 23:55, Singh, Jasvinder wrote:
On 11 Dec 2020, at 22:27, Alex Kiselev wrote:
On 2020-12-11 23:06, Singh, Jasvinder wrote:
On 11 Dec 2020, at 21:29, Alex Kiselev wrote:
On 2020-12-08 14:24, Singh, Jasvinder wrote:
> [JS]
> On 12 Dec 2020, at 01:45, Alex Kiselev wrote:
>
> On 2020-12-12 01:54, Alex Kiselev wrote:
>>> On 2020-12-12 01:45, Alex Kiselev wrote:
>>> On 2020-12-12 01:20, Singh, Jasvinder wrote:
>>>>> On 11 Dec 2020, at 23:37, Alex Kiselev wrote:
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2022 8:39 PM
> To: satish amara
> Cc: users@dpdk.org; Singh, Jasvinder ;
> Dumitrescu, Cristian
> Subject: Re: Fwd: QOS sample example.
>
> +Cc QoS scheduler maintainers (see file MAIN
context which
stores the timestamp of the last visit and it is used when pipe is visited to
schedule the packets from its queues.
Thanks,
Jasvinder
From: satish amara
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2022 9:27 PM
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: users@dpdk.org; Singh, Jasvinder ; Dumitrescu,
Cristian
Hi Satish,
I would encourage you to have a look at library code especially around dequeue
operation to understand the scheduling behaviour.
Some of the answers are inline;
Thanks,
Jasvinder
From: satish amara
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 7:06 PM
To: Singh, Jasvinder
Cc: Thomas Monjalon
To: Singh, Jasvinder
Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; users@dpdk.org; Dumitrescu, Cristian
Subject: Re: Fwd: QOS sample example.
Jasvinder,
I have a few more questions.
Can you provide some clarity on
tc_credits_per_period
tc_period is for how often the credits for traffic need to be updated
26 matches
Mail list logo
