Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: XML document

2016-08-18 Thread Robert Funnell
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Piet van Oostrum wrote: Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Le 17/08/2016 à 18:35, Tom Morton a écrit : > > Hi Tom, > > > This is impossible tho. If I deleted these sections I would have had to have > > deleted them separately as they were not together. And also if I had of > >

[libreoffice-users] Re: XML document

2016-08-18 Thread Piet van Oostrum
Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Le 17/08/2016 à 18:35, Tom Morton a écrit : > > Hi Tom, > > > This is impossible tho. If I deleted these sections I would have had to > > have > > deleted them separately as they were not together. And also if I had of > > deleted them, the footnotes would

[libreoffice-users] Re: XML document

2016-08-18 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 17/08/2016 à 18:35, Tom Morton a écrit : Hi Tom, > This is impossible tho. If I deleted these sections I would have had to have > deleted them separately as they were not together. And also if I had of > deleted them, the footnotes would have disappeared also? I would have had to > have

[libreoffice-users] Re: XML document

2016-08-17 Thread Tom Morton
This is impossible tho. If I deleted these sections I would have had to have deleted them separately as they were not together. And also if I had of deleted them, the footnotes would have disappeared also? I would have had to have highlighted each paragraph and deleted them and made sure I didn't

[libreoffice-users] Re: XML document

2016-08-17 Thread Piet van Oostrum
I tried to save one of my own documents as MS 2003 XML, and it also contains only a part of my original document. Apparently the MS 2003 XML output filter is severely broken, and it should be repaired, or at least be disabled as long as it in this state. There probably isn't a good enough unit

[libreoffice-users] Re: XML document

2016-08-17 Thread Piet van Oostrum
Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Le 17/08/2016 à 14:52, Tom Morton a écrit : > > Hi Tom, > > I opened the XML file in Word 15.24 for Mac OSX > It only contains 2 pages (492 words). > > I opened your ODT file in LO530 alpha (my own master build) > It too only contains 2 pages. (483 words)

[libreoffice-users] Re: XML document

2016-08-17 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 17/08/2016 à 14:52, Tom Morton a écrit : If I open the XML file in a text editor, I see the same content. I can only assume that at some stage you must have erroneously deleted some content from your original ODT file, albeit inadvertently, as the two files are the same. Sorry to not be able

[libreoffice-users] Re: XML document

2016-08-17 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 17/08/2016 à 14:52, Tom Morton a écrit : Hi Tom, I opened the XML file in Word 15.24 for Mac OSX It only contains 2 pages (492 words). I opened your ODT file in LO530 alpha (my own master build) It too only contains 2 pages. (483 words) Both documents are substantially identical. Alex

[libreoffice-users] Re: XML document

2016-08-17 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 17/08/2016 à 14:52, Tom Morton a écrit : Hi Tom, I am assuming that if you have been working on this for a while, then you have a previous version somewhere in ODT format ? Would that not be an option ? Saving in another format doesn't overwrite the previous file. Alex -- To unsubscribe