:19
*Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
Ubuntu install is the same, if using the default install options it
creates the swap partition (at least equal to installed RAM
amount), and
then then one partition for all. I change this and like many here,
create
This is to what I have noticed by many who become anal retentive in this
matter, and obsessive compulsive, over their possessions for want of a
better word. I see it in the way they buy their worldly possessions from
cars, to HiFi, to mobile phones, to their homes and it's contents. All
of it
:)
From: Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za
To:
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, 8 August 2013, 10:30
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
This is to what I have noticed by many who become anal retentive in this
matter, and obsessive compulsive, over
@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, 8 August 2013, 8:43
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
Sorry typo, meant to read 100GB not MB. Allowing for anything FAT coming
along.
Andrew Brown
On 07/08/2013 10:18 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I tend to make / around 10-15Gb now
Ubuntu install is the same, if using the default install options it
creates the swap partition (at least equal to installed RAM amount), and
then then one partition for all. I change this and like many here,
create the root / (100MB), and the balance of the drive capacity to
/home, keeping my
: Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, 7 August 2013, 8:19
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
Ubuntu install is the same, if using the default install options it
creates the swap partition (at least equal to installed RAM amount
:)
From: Sina Momken digi...@gmail.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Cc: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk; Kracked_P_P---webmaster
webmas...@krackedpress.com; users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013, 22:41
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: start
, 7 August 2013, 8:19
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
Ubuntu install is the same, if using the default install options it
creates the swap partition (at least equal to installed RAM amount), and
then then one partition for all. I change this and like many here,
create the root
: Sina Momken digi...@gmail.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Cc: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk; Kracked_P_P---webmaster
webmas...@krackedpress.com; users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013, 22:41
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
I also think that start up
: Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, 7 August 2013, 12:45
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
Just to give you a bloat alert. My Ubuntu 12.04 LTS system, after all
of its updates and upgrades from the repository
On 07/08/2013 15:18, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
My guess is thatUbuntu created an 11Gb Extended Partition purely to put the
11Gb Swap in. Not quite sure why it did that but the installer tries to make
sure your system stays reasonably flexible for the future
Swap is just about on all systems in
Yes, there are a lot of people who can give others proof of what their
system can do. Either by an active demonstration or via benchmark
packages.
I love doing active presentations to non-believers.
I have taken and proved that LO can do things that I claim, by bringing
my laptop[s] to
stays reasonably flexible for the future
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, 7 August 2013, 12:45
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
Just to give you
Hi Ken
Interesting, I'll need to do some more intense reading of the web page,
a nice find. The chart is a bit congested, and they don't seem to cover
the freeware versions of the payware versions on the chart, and the ones
I mentioned below. It would be interesting to see where they fare
Hi :)
+1
Looks like they get a lot of snow
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za
To: Ken Springer snowsh...@q.com
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013, 20:28
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up
I also think that start up time for LO Writer and MS Office and many
other programs is small enough. But opening an empty document in under 3
secs is not a huge win too!
I believe that LO Writer is catastrophically slow in opening heavy
documents. For proving my claim, I've done some experiments.
Hi Sina
You have supplied good info for LO, on your system, but I would like to
point out a few issues I see why your system with LO could be slow. Your
laptop was launched in May 2007 and discontinued a year later, so five
to six year old technology, not completely fair to put the blame at a
2013, 22:41
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
I also think that start up time for LO Writer and MS Office and many
other programs is small enough. But opening an empty document in under 3
secs is not a huge win too!
I believe that LO Writer is catastrophically slow in opening heavy
On 08/07/2013 03:00 AM, Andrew Brown wrote:
Hi Sina
You have supplied good info for LO, on your system, but I would like to
point out a few issues I see why your system with LO could be slow. Your
laptop was launched in May 2007 and discontinued a year later, so five
to six year old
:)
From: Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za
To: Sina Momken digi...@gmail.com
Cc: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk; Kracked_P_P---webmaster
webmas...@krackedpress.com; users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013, 23:30
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up
@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013, 22:41
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
I also think that start up time for LO Writer and MS Office and many
other programs is small enough. But opening an empty document in under 3
secs is not a huge win too!
I believe that LO Writer
; users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013, 22:41
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
I also think that start up time for LO Writer and MS Office and many
other programs is small enough. But opening an empty document in under 3
secs is not a huge win too!
I believe that LO
On 8/6/13 1:28 PM, Andrew Brown wrote:
Hi Ken
Interesting, I'll need to do some more intense reading of the web page,
a nice find. The chart is a bit congested, and they don't seem to cover
the freeware versions of the payware versions on the chart, and the ones
I mentioned below. It would be
Brown andre...@icon.co.za
To: Sina Momken digi...@gmail.com
Cc: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk; Kracked_P_P---webmaster
webmas...@krackedpress.com; users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013, 23:30
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
Hi Sina
You have
; Kracked_P_P---webmaster
webmas...@krackedpress.com; users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013, 22:41
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
I also think that start up time for LO Writer and MS Office and many
other programs is small enough. But opening an empty document
@global.libreoffice.org
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, 7 August 2013, 3:09
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
On 08/07/2013 05:43 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
I would expect that .doc would load slower in Writer and .odt would load
slower in Word.
The question
@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, 7 August 2013, 2:44
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: start up speed
On 08/07/2013 04:00 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Even so that is not really all that low spec. It's actually qite
respectable compared to a lot of systems at my work or other places
On 08/07/2013 01:05 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
If you have your /home on a separate partition then it might be possible to
install the 64bit version of Ubuntu without disturbing your 32 it version. I
tend to use a 10-15Gb partition for / for Ubuntu. It doesn't really need all
that much
28 matches
Mail list logo
