desktops more than any others in the office
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Kracked_P_P---webmasterwebmas...@krackedpress.com
To:users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 5 August 2013, 17:39
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] start up speed
Yes, I get 3 seconds
Ha! Ha! there you go, LO just runs on whatever platform and O/S of your
choice. And for the most part, what is a minute or less really from
switch on to productive use of something. I can't make a cup of tea in
that time, and I mean a real brewed cup of tea. Now at least the movies
can show an
Actually my 3 second test, as stated in a past post, was with 3
utilities open on the screen and 2 or 3 Firefox browser windows open.
The utilities are always loaded at boot by my choice. I have several FF
windows open with many tabs involved. That is part of my normal
desktop use so I do
2013, 14:56
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] start up speed
Actually my 3 second test, as stated in a past post, was with 3
utilities open on the screen and 2 or 3 Firefox browser windows open.
The utilities are always loaded at boot by my choice. I have several FF
windows open with many tabs
my 2 cents
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013, 16:16
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] start up speed
Well, I have had a number of system in where I
.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013, 14:56
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] start up speed
Actually my 3 second test, as stated in a past post, was with 3
On 08/06/2013 11:49 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I tend to take the view that some users will always manage to infect Windows
without even seeming to try. Others will find their system gets infected
despite elaborate precautions that no other sane person would bother with.
It's more a case of
:)
From: Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za
To: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com;
users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013, 19:05
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] start up speed
Hi Tom
You are on track, but one
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013, 19:59
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] start up speed
On 08/06/2013 11:49 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I tend to take the view that some users will always manage to infect Windows
without even seeming to try. Others will find
*To:* Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
*Cc:* Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com;
users@global.libreoffice.org
*Sent:* Tuesday, 6 August 2013, 19:05
*Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-users] start up speed
Hi Tom
You are on track, but one thing I will give
:)
From: Tim Lloyd tim.ll...@gmx.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 5 August 2013, 0:15
Subject: [libreoffice-users] start up speed
Hi All,
I saw a question on the Fedora Forum regarding the boot speed of LO
which is impressive especially
On 08/05/2013 05:03 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
That is weird.
On this fairly crumby laptop, 2.2GHz (hmmm, not so crumby after all) it took
about 0-1 seconds for the LO splash-screen to appear. Same on my really nice
desktop, 1.86GHz (hmmm, not so nice after all!). Both running Ubuntu and
Hi All,
I saw a question on the Fedora Forum regarding the boot speed of LO
which is impressive especially compared to old versions of OOo.
I think this has been discussed here in the past but I can't find any
specific posts. Is there anything running in the background which makes
LO start
@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 5 August 2013, 0:15
Subject: [libreoffice-users] start up speed
Hi All,
I saw a question on the Fedora Forum regarding the boot speed of LO
which is impressive especially compared to old versions of OOo.
I think this has been discussed here in the past but I can't find
14 matches
Mail list logo
