Hi ksc
ksc wrote
I've installed 4.1.4 on the new computer and it works. Any idea why
this would occur?
Makes no sense that an immediately newer version would be so fundamentally
corrupted.
The main reason is that the Calc spreadsheet had a major code rewrite which
enabled several
Thanks. That's a good explanation. Doesn't make sense that the unitiated
(like me, though I've been using computers for years) are led to download
4.2 with a serious flaw.
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:41:55 -0500, Pedro [via Document Foundation Mail
Archive]
Hi :)
I just wish the main downloads page could make that clear instead of
pushing all noobs into using the feature rich branch.
Regards from
Tom :)
On 9 February 2014 21:41, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ksc
ksc wrote
I've installed 4.1.4 on the new computer and it works. Any idea
Now I see that numbers entered for February 1 forward (I tried a few dates)
result in Err:502 in the lower cell in the cumulative column. And I'm using
4.1.4. Another bug?
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:02:45 -0500, TomD [via Document Foundation Mail
Archive] ml-node+s969070n4096364...@n3.nabble.com
Hi ksc
ksc wrote
Now I see that numbers entered for February 1 forward (I tried a few
dates)
result in Err:502 in the lower cell in the cumulative column. And I'm
using
4.1.4. Another bug?
Maybe it is...
Can you provide a step-by-step description on how to replicate this problem
and/or
Hi all
Pedro wrote
ksc wrote
Now I see that numbers entered for February 1 forward (I tried a few
dates)
result in Err:502 in the lower cell in the cumulative column. And I'm
using
4.1.4. Another bug?
Maybe it is...
Can you provide a step-by-step description on how to replicate this
2014-02-10 2:08 GMT+01:00 Pedro pedl...@gmail.com:
In case someone is following this thread,
We are ;)
I received the file by mail and
the error described was a consequence of the functions used if some cells
were not filled in. Therefore it wasn't a bug in the 4.1 branch.
The file
