Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...

//www.netiquette.org) and >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> reminding >> >>> mailing list subscribers to comply with it. >>>> >>>> Among all these points only the last two may relate somewhat more >>>>

Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...

may form a part of the thread. We need that. I notice you have managed to start a new thread "Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ..." that is not integrated with the original thread. This is not correct and you seem to do this for each one of your reply. Below is one page belong

Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...

pt of mailing list discussion threads. From my > > > > perspective it seems you are not familiar with the concept,or that you > > > > perhaps have no desire to become acquainted with these notions which > > > > would be problematic for a mailing list moderator.

Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...

02.02.2017 01:56, anne-ology a écrit : >> Do you know what moderation means? >> >> >> moderation := "the avoidance of excess or extremes, especially in >> one's behavior or political opinions" >> >> >> >> From: toki <toki.kant...@gm

Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...

uot; any "cruft from an email. Signs, mentions of date, time, etc. in an email are part of its information and may form a part of the thread. We need that. I notice you have managed to start a new thread "Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ..." that is not integrated with the o

Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...

Do you know what moderation means? moderation := "the avoidance of excess or extremes, especially in one's behavior or political opinions" From: toki <toki.kant...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:40 PM Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ..

RE: [libreoffice-users] in response ...

users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ... On 02/01/2017 02:03 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> * If nobody else has responded 48 hours later, then, if able to do so, >> address the issue(s) in the message; > ... there is simply no legitimate reason that a

Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...

On Wed Feb 01 2017 14:20:18 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), toki wrote: > The theory, supported by research, is that active moderator > participation, results in a reduction in participation by list members, > with the highest impact being amongst the low-frequency

Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...

On Wed Feb 01 2017 00:13:29 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), toki wrote: > On 01/31/2017 05:21 PM, anne-ology wrote: >> well, when I think the list might be interested in what's going on, >> I cc to the list; > > On any of the lists I moderate, or used to moderate, doing

Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...

les.sch...@documentfoundation.org> Date: Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:39 AM Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ... To: users@global.libreoffice.org Hello Tom, It seems that the problem Brian highlighted is a bit different and is a recurring one. Anne-ology does not seem to understand her

Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...

well, when I think the list might be interested in what's going on, I cc to the list; in that way all have the chance to be informed. From: toki <toki.kant...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:29 AM Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ... To:

Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...

<je...@lang.hm> Date: Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:02 PM Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ... To: anne-ology <lagin...@gmail.com> The tool you use to send email replies does not create References or In-Reply-To headers. That is what breaks threads. The best email tools use those h

Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...

Hello Tom, It seems that the problem Brian highlighted is a bit different and is a recurring one. Anne-ology does not seem to understand her exact role as a list moderator, even after years of being in that position. What she has to do is first to approve the message so that it can reach the

Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...

Hi :) It is not always possible to "do the right thing" so it is good that Anne-ology was able to "handle it" with courteous intelligence. Clearly no-one else had figured out how to deal with it as it had been languishing so long. So it is good that she was able "to go the extra mile". :) So,

[libreoffice-users] in response ...

... this message was waiting for 2 days to be released to the list; when I opened it to see if it was junk or not, I was surprised to see that someone had posted a query. Since I thought I might be able to help, I responded to it. I responded to the original

Re: [libreoffice-users] Slow response time with Calc/Virtual Boxes/Dual boots

On 12/09/2016 07:07 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote: > For me at least, LO Calc 5.1.x works fine on my Linux Mint Cinnamon live USB > LO Calc 5.1.x works fine on a live Ubuntu 14.04 (Unity) USB > LO Calc 5.1.x works fine on a live Puppy Linux (Tahr) USB > LO Calc 5.2.3.3 works fine on my Windows 10

Re: [libreoffice-users] Slow response time with Calc

On 12/9/2016 12:11 PM, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote: > > I had not read the previous posts - removed from my email client. > > Was the version of LO you were having problems with downloaded from > LO's site or from Ubuntu's repository? I currently use version 5.2.3.3. > > I never use the

Re: [libreoffice-users] Slow response time with Calc

Hi. I have a similar issue. I use LibreOffice 5.2.3.3 on Ubuntu xfce 16.04. I run a spreadsheet which downloads some data (ascii numeric) from an internet page and executes some elementary calculations with these data (total .ods is 33,3 kb). pc is i5 with 4 gb ddr4 ram; data are

Re: [libreoffice-users] Slow response time with Calc

I had not read the previous posts - removed from my email client. Was the version of LO you were having problems with downloaded from LO's site or from Ubuntu's repository? I currently use version 5.2.3.3. I never use the repository version or the PPA version. I just download it from LO's

Re: [libreoffice-users] Slow response time with Calc

For what it's worth, I just tried a Calc spreadsheet on the following OSs: Linux Mint 18 Cinnamon running from a live USB session with LO 5.1.2.x Puppy Linux (Tahr) running from a live USB session with LO 5.1.2.x Neither exhibited the same slowness issue that I have with running Ubuntu Mate.

[libreoffice-users] Slow response time with Calc

When using Calc, I like to navigate across the cells using the arrow keys on the keyboard. I'm finding when I do this on my Linux system, the longer I'm in the spreadsheet, the slower my navigation becomes. After a while, there's a large delay when I press one of the arrow keys. Eventually,