What I have found, is that the server doesn't send mail to people if
they're already in the To / Cc lines, and as long as both the list and the
OP get it, everyone will know that the question has been answered. For
example, you will only receive one of this message, even though the list is
in the
: [libreoffice-users] Replying to users
Kieran Peckett wrote:
Just a quick question - when on this list (users), shouldn't we keep the
sender's email in the To / Cc list when we reply-all in case they
haven't
subscribed to the list (which makes sense if they're just looking for
support
At 08:14 22/05/2013 +0100, Kieran Peckett wrote:
What I have found, is that the server doesn't send mail to people if
they're already in the To / Cc lines, ...
No: that's simply untrue. You are noticing the behaviour of Gmail,
your e-mail provider, which ditches what it believes to be
: Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, 22 May 2013, 8:28
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Replying to users
At 08:14 22/05/2013 +0100, Kieran Peckett wrote:
What I have found, is that the server doesn't send mail to people if
they're already
Kieran Peckett wrote:
For
example, you will only receive one of this message, even though the list is
in the Cc.
Actually, I received 2 copies. One from the list and one from you.
What's worse is I generally respond to the first one I read, which is
usually the direct copy. This means I am
On 05/22/2013 07:44 AM, James Knott wrote:
Kieran Peckett wrote:
For
example, you will only receive one of this message, even though the
list is
in the Cc.
Actually, I received 2 copies. One from the list and one from you.
What's worse is I generally respond to the first one I read, which
Just a quick question - when on this list (users), shouldn't we keep
the sender's email in the To / Cc list when we reply-all
No.
in case they haven't subscribed to the list (which makes sense if
they're just looking for support and not for helping others out).
A mailinglist allowing
From: Wolfgang Keller [felip...@gmx.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 8:42 AM
Just a quick question - when on this list (users), shouldn't we keep
the sender's email in the To / Cc list when we reply-all
No.
in case they haven't subscribed to the list (which makes sense if
they're just
Thanks everyone for your help, and for being understanding of why I asked
this, and for explaining that all non-subscribed users get moderated
automatically. I just assumed that it was like Google Groups, which does
have this functionality, and which saves duplicate emails being needlessly
sent.
On 5/22/2013 07:13, V Stuart Foote wrote:
So, use the respond to all option of your email reader of choice, it
SHOULD pick up the mail list address. Delete the other direct
addresses. And finally TRIM away any of the extra crud in the message.
Leave just enough for the message to stand on its
forums is also a good idea with
Base)) while other systems gain reputation in other areas.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Kieran Peckett crazyske...@gmail.com
To:
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, 22 May 2013, 17:33
Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users
Some of us have no option other than to reply-all because of the way our
mailer works with this list.
steve
On 2013-05-22 09:15, James Knott wrote:
Kieran Peckett wrote:
Just a quick question - when on this list (users), shouldn't we keep the
sender's email in the To / Cc list when we
one (the older one) that has the better formatting. So, duplicates are
easy for me.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May 2013, 22:15
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Replying
13 matches
Mail list logo
