>
> One other question - is there an order of processing the .htaccess in the
> document root and the virtual host config? Are they both processed
> together, or does one take precedence over the other?
>
If VirtualHost is the only enclosing scope, it is processed earlier so it
has lower
Hi,
On 4/11/23 8:59 PM, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
Dave Wreski wrote on 2023/04/12 01:39:
In case I wasn't clear, simply removing the caret was not enough to make this work. The
"Require env SOMENAME2" was enough to begin blocking every page on the site
with a 403, not just the RSS feeds or the
Dave Wreski wrote on 2023/04/12 01:39:
> In case I wasn't clear, simply removing the caret was not enough to make this
> work. The "Require env SOMENAME2" was enough to begin blocking every page on
> the site with a 403, not just the RSS feeds or the bots, but every legitimate
> request.
>
>
Hi,
SetEnvIf user-agent "(?i:TurnitinBot)" SOMENAME1
SetEnvIf Request_URI "^linuxsecurity_features\.*$" SOMENAME2
And let it meet all the requirements.
Require all granted
Require not env SOMENAME1
Require env SOMENAME2
This had the effect of
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:49 AM Dave Wreski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> SetEnvIf user-agent "(?i:TurnitinBot)" SOMENAME1
> SetEnvIf Request_URI "^linuxsecurity_features\.*$" SOMENAME2
>
> And let it meet all the requirements.
>
>
> Require all granted
> Require not env SOMENAME1
> Require env
Hi,
SetEnvIf user-agent "(?i:TurnitinBot)" SOMENAME1
SetEnvIf Request_URI "^linuxsecurity_features\.*$" SOMENAME2
And let it meet all the requirements.
Require all granted
Require not env SOMENAME1
Require env SOMENAME2
This had the effect of blocking elements on every page (and
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 9:29 AM Dave Wreski
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 4/10/23 11:48 PM, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
>
> Dave Wreski wrote on 2023/04/11 10:54:
>
> SetEnvIf user-agent "(?i:TurnitinBot)" stayout=1
> SetEnvIf Request_URI "^linuxsecurity_features\.*$" !stayout
>
> I have done it in the past,
Hi,
On 4/10/23 11:48 PM, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
Dave Wreski wrote on 2023/04/11 10:54:
SetEnvIf user-agent "(?i:TurnitinBot)" stayout=1
SetEnvIf Request_URI "^linuxsecurity_features\.*$" !stayout
I have done it in the past, too.
It was like allowing another level of conditions to be attached
Hello.
Frank Gingras wrote on 2023/04/11 13:36:
> The legacy authz directives from 2.2 will indeed cause issues when mixed
> with Require (2.4). Do not mix them.
Yes.
Basically, they MUST NOT BE MIXED, but we should know how they behave when the
mod_access_compat is loaded.
I think it was like
The legacy authz directives from 2.2 will indeed cause issues when mixed
with Require (2.4). Do not mix them.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:48 PM Tatsuki Makino
wrote:
> Dave Wreski wrote on 2023/04/11 10:54:
> > SetEnvIf user-agent "(?i:TurnitinBot)" stayout=1
> > SetEnvIf Request_URI
Dave Wreski wrote on 2023/04/11 10:54:
> SetEnvIf user-agent "(?i:TurnitinBot)" stayout=1
> SetEnvIf Request_URI "^linuxsecurity_features\.*$" !stayout
I have done it in the past, too.
It was like allowing another level of conditions to be attached to Allow and
Deny, depending on the condition
Hi,
I don't know what is troubling you...
For now, don't use the combination of Order,Allow,Deny and Require* in
configuration file that will be created in 202x. :)
AllowDeny of ENV should be replaced by the following.
Allow from env=X_FOOBAR -> Require env X_FOOBAR
It can write more
Hello.
I don't know what is troubling you...
For now, don't use the combination of Order,Allow,Deny and Require* in
configuration file that will be created in 202x. :)
AllowDeny of ENV should be replaced by the following.
Allow from env=X_FOOBAR -> Require env X_FOOBAR
It can write more
Hi,
On 4/10/23 10:51 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
.htaccess: negative Require directive has no effect in
directive
Ah, I guess you'll have to restore the RequireAll and its contents.
Yes, I should have mentioned that I've already done that - without it,
it was producing a 500 error for
>
> .htaccess: negative Require directive has no effect in
> directive
>
Ah, I guess you'll have to restore the RequireAll and its contents.
Hi,
I have an apache-2.4.56 install on fedora37 and trying to block
some bots from accessing the site, unless they're trying to access
our RSS feeds. How can I do this?
I'm blocking the bots with SetEnvIF lines in the .htacess file in
the document root like:
trahie...@gmail.com
Tuk tuk kampot drivers
On Sun, Apr 9, 2023, 1:24 AM Eric Covener wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 2:14 PM Dave Wreski
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have an apache-2.4.56 install on fedora37 and trying to block some bots
>> from accessing the site, unless they're trying to
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 2:14 PM Dave Wreski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an apache-2.4.56 install on fedora37 and trying to block some bots
> from accessing the site, unless they're trying to access our RSS feeds. How
> can I do this?
>
> I'm blocking the bots with SetEnvIF lines in the .htacess file
Hi,
I have an apache-2.4.56 install on fedora37 and trying to block some
bots from accessing the site, unless they're trying to access our RSS
feeds. How can I do this?
I'm blocking the bots with SetEnvIF lines in the .htacess file in the
document root like:
SetEnvIf user-agent
19 matches
Mail list logo
