In your previous mail you wrote:
Do you know if there is any other implementation of Mobile IPv6 for FreeBSD
apart from the Monarch Project one?
= there are mine (integrated in the "INRIA" stack distrib) and
Ericsson's one (integrated in the "KAME" stack) at least.
Regards
[EMAIL
In your previous mail you wrote:
= there are mine (integrated in the "INRIA" stack distrib) and
Do you mean that you have got MobileIPv6 code integrated in your HMIPv6
from your server? If not, from which address can I get it?
= no, there are two different things:
- regular
I am newbie in IPV6, anyone can tell me, from where (where situs ?
or from other source) I should be start learning IPV6 ...
I appologize with my english .
Wassalamu'alaikum Wr. Wb.
-arphi-
http://oon.if.itb.ac.id
this
"Cricket Liu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Regarding this proposed "reply with A6/ RRs only if queried
over IPv6" suggestion: Even if we imagine this enhancement patched
in to BIND 9.1.0 and deployed on the root name servers, how are we
going to prevent non-root name servers from
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Francis Dupont wrote:
= there are mine (integrated in the "INRIA" stack distrib) and
Do you mean that you have got MobileIPv6 code integrated in your HMIPv6
from your server? If not, from which address can I get it?
Matt Crawford wrote:
Has anyone supplied an IPv6 address for their name server when
registering or updating a domain directly under COM, NET, ORG or EDU?
If so, what happened?
The result is ...
We are unable to process the Host Form below because
of an error within the form. In
Date:Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:35:14 -0500 (EST)
From:Jim Bound [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| A6 is PS not DS. If it will not work as is we have every right to oppose
| it.
All of IPv6 is DS (or less), not full std, so the same could be said.
|
Has anyone supplied an IPv6 address for their name server when
registering or updating a domain directly under COM, NET, ORG or EDU?
If so, what happened?
-
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe
| I also think the
| processing of A6 should not be done on clients but on the servers.
That argument was made (by you, and others) back when A6 was being
debated. If you care to look back over the archives (IPNG, and
perhaps DNSIND) you will see why things are the way they are.
I'm sure
IP-v6 White Paper
http://www.comsoc.org/pubs/surveys/stallings/stallings-orig.html
IP-v6 comprehensive references:
http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/specs/specifications.html
IP-v6 forum
http://www.ipv6forum.com
Cisco's IPv6
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/ipv6/index.shtml
IP-v6
10 matches
Mail list logo