Re: implementation of MobileIPv6

2001-01-23 Thread Francis Dupont
In your previous mail you wrote: Do you know if there is any other implementation of Mobile IPv6 for FreeBSD apart from the Monarch Project one? = there are mine (integrated in the "INRIA" stack distrib) and Ericsson's one (integrated in the "KAME" stack) at least. Regards [EMAIL

Re: implementation of MobileIPv6

2001-01-23 Thread Francis Dupont
In your previous mail you wrote: = there are mine (integrated in the "INRIA" stack distrib) and Do you mean that you have got MobileIPv6 code integrated in your HMIPv6 from your server? If not, from which address can I get it? = no, there are two different things: - regular

start learning IPV6

2001-01-23 Thread OON Arfian's IF
I am newbie in IPV6, anyone can tell me, from where (where situs ? or from other source) I should be start learning IPV6 ... I appologize with my english . Wassalamu'alaikum Wr. Wb. -arphi- http://oon.if.itb.ac.id this

Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns

2001-01-23 Thread Perry E. Metzger
"Cricket Liu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Regarding this proposed "reply with A6/ RRs only if queried over IPv6" suggestion: Even if we imagine this enhancement patched in to BIND 9.1.0 and deployed on the root name servers, how are we going to prevent non-root name servers from

Re: implementation of MobileIPv6

2001-01-23 Thread Ana Romero
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Francis Dupont wrote: = there are mine (integrated in the "INRIA" stack distrib) and Do you mean that you have got MobileIPv6 code integrated in your HMIPv6 from your server? If not, from which address can I get it?

Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns

2001-01-23 Thread Joseph T. Klein
Matt Crawford wrote: Has anyone supplied an IPv6 address for their name server when registering or updating a domain directly under COM, NET, ORG or EDU? If so, what happened? The result is ... We are unable to process the Host Form below because of an error within the form. In

Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns

2001-01-23 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:35:14 -0500 (EST) From:Jim Bound [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | A6 is PS not DS. If it will not work as is we have every right to oppose | it. All of IPv6 is DS (or less), not full std, so the same could be said. |

Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns

2001-01-23 Thread Matt Crawford
Has anyone supplied an IPv6 address for their name server when registering or updating a domain directly under COM, NET, ORG or EDU? If so, what happened? - The IPv6 Users Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe

RE: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns

2001-01-23 Thread Jim . Bound
| I also think the | processing of A6 should not be done on clients but on the servers. That argument was made (by you, and others) back when A6 was being debated. If you care to look back over the archives (IPNG, and perhaps DNSIND) you will see why things are the way they are. I'm sure

RE: start learning IPV6

2001-01-23 Thread Aouriri, Chedley
IP-v6 White Paper http://www.comsoc.org/pubs/surveys/stallings/stallings-orig.html IP-v6 comprehensive references: http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/specs/specifications.html IP-v6 forum http://www.ipv6forum.com Cisco's IPv6 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/ipv6/index.shtml IP-v6