Perhaps not a main answer to your questions but keep in mind (or get it as
new information) that you have about 2^46 local self defineable IPv6
addresses per subnet available. With an IPv6-enabled Apache it's possible
to bind each virtual host on its own IPv6 address i.e.
www1.domain1.com :
Therefore IPless virtual hosting is no longer necessary on IPv6 (good for
SSL!).
I thought IPless virtual hosting is no longer necessary due to
HTTP 1.1 Host: header. is my understanding correct?
oops, I wrote it backwards - IPless virtual hosting already works fine
At 23:23 01.02.2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps not a main answer to your questions but keep in mind (or get it as
new information) that you have about 2^46 local self defineable IPv6
addresses per subnet available. With an IPv6-enabled Apache it's possible
to bind each virtual host on
