nothing different from v4, no?
fundamentally, no. in either case you want to arrange for the root
servers to have addresses that are more stable than the average IPv#
address.
Keith
-
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
but perhaps you should communicate TECHNICAL NEEDS to ngtrans
please explain what is non-technical about the need to have at least
one or two servers in place for ip6.arpa?
or does the lack of a specific number in Perry's request somehow
make it non-technical?
seems like the dnsops folks
'clever' people are likely to seriously abuse DNAME and A6. we have already
seen unnecessary and confusing attempted use of DNAME over in the enum wg.
is there any *significant* advantage to them allowing more than one level of
indirection?
I can't tell that there is any significant
given that renumbering events are unlikely to be entirely automatic anyway
as fred succintly said, how often does renumbering occur? how often do
lookups occur? so, for which should we optimize?
makes sense to me.
Keith
