Date:Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:03:03 -0500
From:Keith Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| What would be rational is for the complete address to be updated
| at the primary server for the zone and propagated from there to
| secondaries, caches,
Date:Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:15:31 -0600
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: B9CFA6CE8FFDD211A1FB0008C7894E4603063B3F@bseis01nok
| Those debates were before running code. The running code is not going to
| scale and is not scaling. Or does that not mean anything
Date:Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:35:14 -0500 (EST)
From:Jim Bound [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| A6 is PS not DS. If it will not work as is we have every right to oppose
| it.
All of IPv6 is DS (or less), not full std, so the same could be said.
|
Date:Sat, 20 Jan 2001 21:13:22 +0900
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| could you give us more concrete example, so that we can share the
| image in your mind?
|
| (i am 100% guessing here) if you mean something like dialup
