Daniele Nicolucci (Jollino wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Giovedì, agosto 1, 2002, alle 03:22 , Jeroen Massar ha scritto:
jeroen@purgatory:~$ cat /etc/radvd.conf
interface eth1
{
AdvSendAdvert on;
prefix 3ffe:8114:2000:240::/64
{
};
};
Daniele Nicolucci (Jollino wrote:
Thanks, Tony! It works just by setting the default route to 2000::/3
instead of ::/0!
Do you have an old Linux Kernel? I know i had this problem last year during
my first steps in IPv6 too and i also used 2000::/3, but currently, ::/0
woks without any
From: Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
prefix 3ffe:8114:2000:240::/64
ip -6 addr add 3ffe:8114:2000:240:290:27ff:fe24:c19f/64 dev eth1
Fill in your own IP in the range as defined above, start radvd
et tada, it should work.
I am just wonder , how to calculate;
3ffe:8114:2000:240::/64 in
Danny Terweij wrote:
SNIP
Same here, but from XP and Win2k Server i got an Timed out
message from ping6.
I am playing with routes but it seems that radvd is not routing at
all?
radvd stands for Router ADVertisement Daemon. It doesn't route, it
_advertises_ them.
Ofcourse only if properly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can't use /96. all subnets needs to have /64 by default.
*clear throat* hrmhrm...
..why?
Tia,
Stephan
-
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe users to [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can't use /96. all subnets needs to have /64 by default.
*clear throat* hrmhrm...
..why?
Tia,
Stephan
-
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe users to [EMAIL
you can't use /96. all subnets needs to have /64 by default.
*clear throat* hrmhrm...
..why?
read RFC2460 to RFC2463.
itojun
-
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe users to [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Venerdì, agosto 2, 2002, alle 12:24 , Tony Langdon ha scritto:
I have also tried with /64, but the problem persists: it
looks like my
gateway can't route packets correctly, and gets stuck in some kind of
neighbourhood discovery... how am I
I have also tried with /64, but the problem persists: it
looks like my
gateway can't route packets correctly, and gets stuck in some kind of
neighbourhood discovery... how am I supposed to bypass this and just
route the packets to the default gateway, like it does for local ipv6
Hello there,
I am testing Windows XP for a while and I am - of course :) - trying the IPv6
connectivity.
I already have a Linux machine with ipv6 up and running, using 3ffe:8171:10:8::/64. I
decided to reserve 3ffe:8171:10:8::1984:0:0/96 to this LAN test.
you can't use /96. all
10 matches
Mail list logo
