Re: IPv6 Routing with FreeBSD

2002-04-04 Thread Daniel Delaney
I am currently using route6d. My external interface is working properly. The internal interface and hosts connected to that interface are not getting routes (I think). When I try and traceroute, ping, or do anything from one of the internal hosts, I get timeouts. Most likely I do not have

Re: IPv6 Routing with FreeBSD

2002-04-04 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 08:04:04AM -0500, Daniel Delaney wrote: I am currently using route6d. My external interface is working properly. The internal interface and hosts connected to that interface are not getting routes (I think). When I try and traceroute, ping, or do anything from one of

Re: what about 2002::/16 reverse DNS?

2002-04-04 Thread Peter Bieringer
Now maillist is running again, so I resent: Hi, --On Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:04:43 AM -0800 Bill Manning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, you can get delegations under 2.0.0.2.ip6.int. send a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] anyone know whether this address has more a longer or shorter

Re: what about 2002::/16 reverse DNS?

2002-04-04 Thread Bill Manning
% --On Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:04:43 AM -0800 Bill Manning % [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: % % yes, you can get delegations under 2.0.0.2.ip6.int. % % send a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] % % anyone know whether this address has more a longer or shorter % responding time? depends.

Re: what about 2002::/16 reverse DNS?

2002-04-04 Thread itojun
% Some Unix/g?libc or other resolvers only queries PTR for % reverses-dotted-nibbles.ip6.int % others (more newer ones) only for % reverses-dotted-nibbles.ip6.arpa another way is to query: reverses-dotted-nibbles.ip6.arpa and then if there's no

Re: Prefix error?

2002-04-04 Thread itojun
a subnet must always be /64. Why? we have decided so in address architecture document (at least under 2000::/3 space), fixed boundary gives us ease of management. or do you really plan to connect more than 2^64 devices on a single subnet? itojun