I am currently using route6d. My external interface
is working properly. The internal interface and hosts connected to that
interface are not getting routes (I think). When I try and traceroute, ping, or
do anything from one of the internal hosts, I get timeouts.
Most likely I do not have
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 08:04:04AM -0500, Daniel Delaney wrote:
I am currently using route6d. My external interface is working properly. The
internal interface and hosts connected to that interface are not getting routes (I
think). When I try and traceroute, ping, or do anything from one of
Now maillist is running again, so I resent:
Hi,
--On Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:04:43 AM -0800 Bill Manning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, you can get delegations under 2.0.0.2.ip6.int.
send a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anyone know whether this address has more a longer or shorter
% --On Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:04:43 AM -0800 Bill Manning
% [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% yes, you can get delegations under 2.0.0.2.ip6.int.
%
% send a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%
% anyone know whether this address has more a longer or shorter
% responding time?
depends.
% Some Unix/g?libc or other resolvers only queries PTR for
% reverses-dotted-nibbles.ip6.int
% others (more newer ones) only for
% reverses-dotted-nibbles.ip6.arpa
another way is to query:
reverses-dotted-nibbles.ip6.arpa
and then if there's no
a subnet must always be /64.
Why?
we have decided so in address architecture document (at least under
2000::/3 space), fixed boundary gives us ease of management.
or do you really plan to connect more than 2^64 devices on a single
subnet?
itojun