Re: rdf:parseType="literal" vs. rdf:datatype="...XMLLiteral"

2024-04-25 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 25/04/2024 07:58, Thomas Francart wrote: Hello Andy Le lun. 22 avr. 2024 à 21:03, Andy Seaborne a écrit : On 22/04/2024 08:02, Thomas Francart wrote: Hello This is 3.17.0. Pretty old, due to other dependency with TopQuadrant SHACL API. It's not perfect in 5.0.0 either.

Re: rdf:parseType="literal" vs. rdf:datatype="...XMLLiteral"

2024-04-25 Thread Thomas Francart
Hello Andy Le lun. 22 avr. 2024 à 21:03, Andy Seaborne a écrit : > > On 22/04/2024 08:02, Thomas Francart wrote: > > Hello > > > > This is 3.17.0. Pretty old, due to other dependency with TopQuadrant > SHACL > > API. > > It's not perfect in 5.0.0 either. > > TopQuadrant SHACL is now 4.10.0. It

Re: rdf:parseType="literal" vs. rdf:datatype="...XMLLiteral"

2024-04-22 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 22/04/2024 08:02, Thomas Francart wrote: Hello This is 3.17.0. Pretty old, due to other dependency with TopQuadrant SHACL API. It's not perfect in 5.0.0 either. TopQuadrant SHACL is now 4.10.0. It would be good to upgrade because of XML security issue fixes around Jena 4.3.2. It is

Re: rdf:parseType="literal" vs. rdf:datatype="...XMLLiteral"

2024-04-22 Thread Thomas Francart
Hello This is 3.17.0. Pretty old, due to other dependency with TopQuadrant SHACL API. Thomas Le sam. 20 avr. 2024 à 18:06, Andy Seaborne a écrit : > Hi Thomas, > > Which version of Jena is this? > > Andy > > On 19/04/2024 17:18, Thomas Francart wrote: > > Hello > > > > The RDF/XML

Re: rdf:parseType="literal" vs. rdf:datatype="...XMLLiteral"

2024-04-20 Thread Andy Seaborne
Hi Thomas, Which version of Jena is this? Andy On 19/04/2024 17:18, Thomas Francart wrote: Hello The RDF/XML parsing of the following succeeds: https://xx.xx.xx/PC"/> while the RDF/XML parsing of this gives an error : in that case the XML has simply be encoded with , and and the

Re: rdf:parseType="literal" vs. rdf:datatype="...XMLLiteral"

2024-04-19 Thread Martynas Jusevičius
*not* rdf:datatype On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 7:10 PM Martynas Jusevičius wrote: > > AFAIK for XMLLiterals you need to use rdf:parseType="Literal", rdf:datatype: > https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Syntax-XML-literals > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 18.18, Thomas Francart > wrote: >>

Re: rdf:parseType="literal" vs. rdf:datatype="...XMLLiteral"

2024-04-19 Thread Martynas Jusevičius
AFAIK for XMLLiterals you need to use rdf:parseType="Literal", rdf:datatype: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Syntax-XML-literals On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 18.18, Thomas Francart wrote: > Hello > > The RDF/XML parsing of the following succeeds: > > > > href=" >

rdf:parseType="literal" vs. rdf:datatype="...XMLLiteral"

2024-04-19 Thread Thomas Francart
Hello The RDF/XML parsing of the following succeeds: https://xx.xx.xx/PC"/> while the RDF/XML parsing of this gives an error : in that case the XML has simply be encoded with , and and the rdf:datatype has been explicitly set to XMLLiteral :