Re: bearebox eating cpu time

Well, if you had a store filesystem problem, you would get waiting I/O CPU in your top, which you don't. You can verify with: iostat 1 10 Anyway, why do you say that 8% CPU is excessive? It seems normal to me. How much did it use to be? What is your CPU hardware? BR, Nikos - Original

Can't set esm_class

Hi list, –– Browsing the list archives, I can't seem to find an answer to this, so an up-front apology for asking this for the nth time. Either as a response to an SMS service request, or directly using SMS send, how do I set the SMPP ``esm_class`` to something other than the default 3 =

Test SyncMl Setting

HI All, I wanted to test SyncMl setting. we have the XML file in which SyncML setting are defined. Now I am facing problem in converting that XML file to wbxml format. Also what UDH value and port number we should use for SyncMl Setting. I found few help about UDH and port number as

Re: bearebox eating cpu time

Hi Nikkos I do have a dual cpu dual core xeon with 4GB Ram [r...@srvcom1 ~]# dmesg | grep -i hz Detected 1596.575 MHz processor. hpet0: 3 64-bit timers, 14318180 Hz CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5110 @ 1.60GHz stepping 06 CPU1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5110 @ 1.60GHz stepping 06

Re: bearebox eating cpu time

Pretty descent system. I hope it isn't the system with the fried motherboard :-) Can you post again the output of top, or better mpstat or sar? Seems someone deleted this from the thread. 8% is reasonably low under traffic. However, when there is none, it is a cause for concern. I presume

Re: bearebox eating cpu time

Nikos Thanks God it was just my laptop motherboard that died, not the server. In this moment I have no traffic and bearerbox still at 6-8% [r...@srvcom1 ~]# top top - 15:50:54 up 26 days, 15:23, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.27, 0.24 Tasks: 218 total, 1 running, 204 sleeping, 0 stopped,

Re: bearebox eating cpu time

Hello all, oook , it looks interesting .. :) try that: ps -eo pcpu,pid,user,args | sort -k 1 -r | grep bear in short, the bellow example is dual Xeon box with apache qmail mysql kannel with postgresql based sqlbox model name : Pentium III (Coppermine) stepping: 3 cpu MHz :

Kannel reliably sends text to some mobile phones, others fail

I can reliably send SMS messages with Kannel to certain mobile phones but it fails for others. However, if we use gnokii with the same modem, it can successfully send an SMS message to the phones that are failing with Kannel. I am using Kannel 1.4.3 under Fedora 12. The modem is a Wavecom