Re: Smsbox SMS Services -Incoming SMS datetime problem

2010-06-23 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Absolutely, yes, it is generated by smsbox. Could you please post your sms-service configuration? Sorry for taking too much time asking about log times, but just now I realized what your problem is. I have never checked sms-service, since I've only dealt with MT traffic. There are no

Re: Smsbox SMS Services -Incoming SMS datetime problem

2010-06-23 Thread Emmanuel CHANSON
Thanks Nikos, Of course I can handle it in PlaySMS (in the geturl.php script that process the incoming MO from smsbox). I just post to kannel users in case it was a bad behavior that can be improved, but if it was coded like that to manage such HTTP calls that can not know the timezone, Ok I

Re: Smsbox SMS Services -Incoming SMS datetime problem

2010-06-23 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Hi, You can certainly do that yourself, it is not a big change. However, it is not recommended, since you will branch off svn and then have to merge changes to ultrans.c. Itr would be preferable to handle it in playSMS. Let me post a question to devel to see how other people feel about it,

sending SMS out via preferred SMSC

2010-06-23 Thread Latitude Berlin
Hi, I have configured kannel to send SMS via SMPP with 2 groups defined. As I understand, Kannel does load balancing itself and choses one of the configured to send out SMS. I am sending bulk of messages and want to use only connection1. I did this the following way: kannel.conf

Re: sending SMS out via preferred SMSC

2010-06-23 Thread Konstantin Vayner
I actually prefer using allowed-smsc-id (set to self - or name you give to group of smscs that should be balanced between...) in such cases, especially when there are a lot of links defined Regards, Konstantin On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Latitude Berlin latitude.de@ googlemail.com wrote:

Re: sending SMS out via preferred SMSC

2010-06-23 Thread Latitude Berlin
Hi Konstantin, And you use ..smsc=CONN_NAME? I tired this too but didn't work for me. Cheers. On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Konstantin Vayner pon...@appcell.netwrote: I actually prefer using allowed-smsc-id (set to self - or name you give to group of smscs that should be balanced

RE: smppbox forwarding

2010-06-23 Thread ishagh ouldbah
Does this work with a kannel client smpp the gateway does not run smppbox --- On Tue, 6/22/10, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote: From: Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl Subject: RE: smppbox forwarding To: 'ishagh ouldbah' ishagh...@yahoo.com, users@kannel.org Date: Tuesday, June 22, 2010,

Re: sending SMS out via preferred SMSC

2010-06-23 Thread Konstantin Vayner
yep, thats what i use... for example: group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = smsc1 ... allowed-smsc-id = smsc1 group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = smsc2 ... allowed-smsc-id = smsc2 and then when passing message to sendsms add smsc=smsc1 or smsc=smsc2 works fine for me On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at

Re: sending SMS out via preferred SMSC

2010-06-23 Thread Latitude Berlin
Thanks - did you try sending a bulk of messages (say 6 messages via smsc1)? I have the feeling that if you send a bulk with smsc=smsc1, and smsc1 is busy, it will use smsc2. Also do you know what happens if smsc1 is down? Will smsc2 be used or the msg will be queued until smsc1 comes up? Cheers

Re: sending SMS out via preferred SMSC

2010-06-23 Thread Konstantin Vayner
I'm sending bulks much larger than that... queues build up separately if smsc1 is down messages will be queued until it comes back up (or until they expire) On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Latitude Berlin latitude...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks - did you try sending a bulk of messages (say

Re: smppbox forwarding

2010-06-23 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Hi, Like that: ESME - SMPPBOX - BB -Another SMPPBOX - Another BB - ... Nikos - Original Message - From: ishagh ouldbah To: users@kannel.org ; Rene Kluwen Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 12:46 PM Subject: RE: smppbox forwarding Does this work with a kannel client smpp the gateway

Re: sending SMS out via preferred SMSC

2010-06-23 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Hi, Using allowed-smsc-id = smsc1, will build up queue if smsc1 is down. There is no sense in using denied-smsc-id when using allowed-smsc-id. If, however, you use preferred-smsc-id = smsc1 and smsc1 goes down, SMS will go through another smsc. In that scenario, denied-smsc-id make sense.

Kannel drop MT's when bearerbox is stopped.

2010-06-23 Thread ahmad aburass
Hello All, I know that there is a lot of links indicating that Kannel doesnt do it, but i face it in my deployment, so I thought maybe its something wrong in my configuration. I'm using bearerbox with multiple smsboxes attached to it, along side with sqlbox. I have configured store subsystem

Re: smppbox forwarding

2010-06-23 Thread ishagh ouldbah
But this does not seem to me like kannel conf thanks --- On Wed, 6/23/10, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com wrote: From: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com Subject: Re: smppbox forwarding To: ishagh ouldbah ishagh...@yahoo.com, users@kannel.org, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl Date:

smppbox installation message Nothing to be done for 'install-exec-am'

2010-06-23 Thread ishagh ouldbah
Hi all I was installing smpp box and it ends up with messages lik Nothing to be done for 'install-exec-am' what  i did was 1- downlod kannel svn 2-download smpp svn 3-install kannel svn (OK) 4-istall smppbox (ended with above msg) is this an error (did smppbox install) Regards

problem by starting bearerbox

2010-06-23 Thread Helge Wiemann
Hello, I got the following output during starting the bearerbox. 2010-06-23 15:53:07 [6041] [8] DEBUG: Thread 8 (gw/bb_udp.c:udp_receiver) maps to pid 6041. 2010-06-23 15:53:07 [6041] [12] DEBUG: Thread 12 (gw/bb_boxc.c:wdp_to_wapboxes) maps to pid 6041. 2010-06-23 15:53:07 [6041] [10] DEBUG:

Re: sending SMS out via preferred SMSC

2010-06-23 Thread Latitude Berlin
Thanks Nikos. Making sure that I understood you: group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = smsc1 ... preferred-smsc-id = smsc1 group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = smsc2 ... preferred-smsc-id = smsc2 and http req with: smsc=smsc1 will send messages via smsc1. smc2 will _ONLY_ be used if smsc1 is

Re: problem by starting bearerbox

2010-06-23 Thread Milan P. Stanic
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 16:10, Helge Wiemann wrote: Hello, I got the following output during starting the bearerbox. 2010-06-23 15:53:07 [6041] [8] DEBUG: Thread 8 (gw/bb_udp.c:udp_receiver) maps to pid 6041. 2010-06-23 15:53:07 [6041] [12] DEBUG: Thread 12 (gw/bb_boxc.c:wdp_to_wapboxes)

Re: problem by starting bearerbox

2010-06-23 Thread Helge Wiemann
My kannel.conf looks like this: group = smsc smsc = at modemtype = wavecom device = /dev/ttyUSB0 speed = 9600 pin = mypin group = modems id = wavecom name = Wavecom WM0D2 detect-string = Wavecom detect-string2 = WM0D2 need-sleep = true What might by the problem? Now I am getting a: 2010-06-23

Re: problem by starting bearerbox

2010-06-23 Thread Milan P. Stanic
[ A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? ] On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 16:52, Helge Wiemann wrote: My kannel.conf looks like this: group = smsc smsc = at modemtype = wavecom device = /dev/ttyUSB0 speed = 9600 pin = mypin

Re: problem by starting bearerbox

2010-06-23 Thread Alvaro Cornejo
Hi You can use vwdial config option to have it search for the modem and test some basic init-strings. use # wvdialconf wvdial.conf It will scan all available ports/speeds and will try to fecth a basic config. With the info gathered, you can test a manual connection with minicom and if it works

Re: Mask shorcode and reply to number

2010-06-23 Thread Sergio Gabriel Gallegos
I hope to find an alternative such as tagging and send from one to answer me now I'm still looking, thanks to all 2010/6/20 Milan P. Stanic m...@arvanta.net On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 13:14, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: You probably need to play with the TON and maybe NPI settings. Alphanumeric

Re: problem by starting bearerbox

2010-06-23 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Hi, Seems you have wrong serial device for your modem. Please read User's guide about modem installation. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Helge Wiemann h...@open-your-bytes.de To: users@kannel.org Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:52 PM Subject: Re: problem by starting bearerbox

Re: problem by starting bearerbox

2010-06-23 Thread Helge Wiemann
Hi, thanks first of all :-) A dmesg gives me: [17701.392078] usb 3-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 17 [17701.554295] usb 3-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [17701.557205] pl2303 3-1:1.0: pl2303 converter detected [17701.569263] usb 3-1: pl2303 converter now

Re: sending SMS out via preferred SMSC

2010-06-23 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Pretty much, yeah. Smsc2 will be used only if smsc1 has problems, i.e. is down, queue is full , etc. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Latitude Berlin To: Nikos Balkanas Cc: Konstantin Vayner ; users Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:17 PM Subject: Re: sending SMS out via preferred

Re: Kannel drop MT's when bearerbox is stopped.

2010-06-23 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Hi, What is your included operator1.conf file? Is this your: *** operator1 smsbox config file I am surprised this thing works at all. 1) Comments are specified by #, not *. I presume this is just in the email. 2) If the included file is the operator1.conf you post, then you end up with a

Re: Kannel drop MT's when bearerbox is stopped.

2010-06-23 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
store-dump-freq = 600 means 5 minutes between store writes... Maybe you're losing all messages queued during the last 5 minutes? Try putting 10 in there, or commenting the line and see if things improve. Regards, Alex 2010/6/23 Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com Hi, What is your included

Re: problem by starting bearerbox

2010-06-23 Thread Alvaro Cornejo
Seems you modem is right on ttyUSB0 You might try with other speeds 34200? Maybe it does not support AT commands at all? |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y

RE: smppbox installation message Nothing to be done for 'install-exec-am'

2010-06-23 Thread Rene Kluwen
If you see smppbox in /usr/local/sbin then it installed. == Rene From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of ishagh ouldbah Sent: woensdag 23 juni 2010 15:21 To: users@kannel.org Subject: smppbox installation message Nothing to be done for

Re: Scheduling Question

2010-06-23 Thread Juan Nin
check the docs for priority On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:40 AM, T.K.Thapa tapan_thapa2...@yahoo.comwrote: What exactly i am trying to achieve here is, our SMPP provider has provided us 5 msg per second throughput and i have two users. First user is submitting sms directly into sqlbox database

Re: Scheduling Question

2010-06-23 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Hi, You could also define 2 smsc groups, with different smsc-ids, all to the same smsc. Assign throughput 3 to the 1 2 to the other. Then put preferred-smsc-id to 1 itself and allowed-smsc-id to 2 itself. Send sqlbox traffic to the 1(3) and important traffic (I assume less) to the 2. This