Thanks guys,
I managed to find out that bbox and smsbox were starting up well. The issue
was the sort of a bug in firefox that kept blocking the urls with the
messages This website doesn't suply identity information. Connection not
encrypted
I installed lynx what was missing in FC10. i.e
$yum
AFAIK Kannel set throughput to 100/second. So if we want more then we increase
the number. Otherwise decrease to avoid throttling error from telco.
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/
On Aug 14, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Juan Nin wrote:
Actually you're wrong.
You
Nope. Adjust throughput according to your smsc agreement. Avoid throttling.
They can slow down kannel to a crawl.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com
To: Juan Nin jua...@gmail.com
Cc: users@kannel.org
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 9:55 AM
Subject: Re:
Nope. The average between various servers that have been tested are
approximately the ones cited. Standard deviation between optimized
servers/OS is not that large (+/-50). This includes various
conditions/architectures, each one with each own results. I just posted the
most common ones. No
Dear users,
Has anybody tried to send bulk sms from a client via smpp to smppbox? It seems
that smppbox or bearerbox accepts bulk sms extremely slowly. My client is not
able to inject bulk sms to my smppbox (10 sms or so). Kannel keeps stalling
while receiving the messages. I am using a
Your performance tests, while worth looking as a general reference, are
probably near to useless as benchmarks for other people's platforms.
1. Variations in hardware could alter your figures greatly. Differences in
CPU, memory and/or HDD speeds, as well as using RAID and/or SATA/SCSI/Fiber
Userguide is your bestfriend. Since HTTP SMSC is very generic, it is probably
you need to modify it.
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/
On Aug 14, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Omar THIAM wrote:
Hi ,
Does somebody can help me about configuring kannel with smsc
using
Onlly 10 sms is nothing of course. I wouldn't even call it bulk sms.
Is there anyone else with the same problems? Because if so, it seems a
serious enough issue to look into.
-- Rene
Dear users,
Has anybody tried to send bulk sms from a client via smpp to smppbox? It
seems that smppbox
Onlly 10 sms is nothing of course. I wouldn't even call it bulk sms.
Is there anyone else with the same problems? Because if so, it seems a
serious enough issue to look into.
-- Rene
Dear users,
Has anybody tried to send bulk sms from a client via smpp to smppbox? It
seems that smppbox
Sorry Alex,
What you say is largely unsupported and unsubstantiated, unless you have some
numbers to back it up. I do.
1 2) Results asked and tests given are for typical conditions (normal fs,
spool) and a medium 64bit Ubuntu, kernel 2.6.31-22 box (dual-core Xeon
@3.4GHz). Interestingly,
I agree that we were talking about Kannel performance itself, isolated
from apps themselves (Alex's point #4).
But regarding all of his other points, I agree with all of them, and
without having mentioned them before, that was the type of things I
was thinking of.
Your tests having thrown similar
Hmm, nope, the fact is, you performed some benchmarks a on a few boxes and
pretend it to be the holy grail of Kannel's performance benchmarks. It's
not.
Your tests might be valid for your setup, specially if you're optimizing
things around and you repeat the tests to compare before and after the
I am not pretending to hold any holy grail. A user asked for some typical
numbers and I gave him some averages. On the other hand you go talking on
and on wihout anything to show for, and that's irresponsible.
If they don't mean anything to you, that's fine, you can always get your own
Again, I just replied to a user asking about typical conditions. Some of the
exotic things that Alex mentioned, like RAID or solid-state fs or clustered
DBs are not considered typical, and are hardly what the user was asking for
(else he would have mentioned them). Nevertrheless, it would be
Nikos,
It's great that you gave the numbers you obtained on your tests, so
that someone can have an idea on what's possible to achieve with
Kannel.
What we're saying, is that you are stating that because your tests
gave similar results on a few different server configurations that
means that
Hi all,
First sorry for asking the same stupid question second time.
Question: is it possible to send to smsbox raw GSM 03.38 encoded byte
string (with or without UDH) for coding=0?
The problem is that I need to send concatenated messages and take
control on delivery of each part instead of
We're not saying if it's typical or not typical, we're saying exactly
that, that it all depends A LOT on your hardware and architecture
configuration.
Such environments may not be typical for a single user who is just
doing some basic stuff, or for a small company or others, but it is
very typical
Juan,
I am sorry, I don't have time for more of this. I stand by my results as I
gave them, and if you have something better to share, please do. Otherwise I
think it is high time to wrap it up.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Juan Nin jua...@gmail.com
To: users@kannel.org
18 matches
Mail list logo
