Thanks for the clarification. Turned out that in my case, some of the
message IDs would get recycled given enough time and volume. So in order to
generate unique redis keys, I still had to include the destination.
In case anyone is interested, I ended up making a local change to
Ts is just the old variable name, the remote message id is used for that
field, not a time stamp. So as long as your supplier provides a unique
message ID you won't have collisions
On Tuesday, 01 November 2016, Robert Chen
wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to set up
Hi, I'm trying to set up Kannel with Redis. My concern is that some DLRs
would be lost due to timestamp collisions. And my question is whether
hard-coding dlr_redis_add to use the destination (at least for my personal
installation) is the best approach.
dlr_redis.c:
Changing:
if (entry->use_dst