RE: NACK reporting help

2012-03-09 Thread Rene Kluwen
From: Ashish Agarwal [mailto:ashisha...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 08 March, 2012 05:22 To: Alexander Malysh Cc: users@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen Subject: Re: NACK reporting help Hi, Please help me how can this be achieved. On Mar 8, 2012 2:00 AM, Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org wrote

Re: NACK reporting help

2012-03-09 Thread Alvaro Cornejo
if it works or not. =+= Rene From: Ashish Agarwal [mailto:ashisha...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 08 March, 2012 05:22 To: Alexander Malysh Cc: users@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen Subject: Re: NACK reporting help Hi, Please help me how can this be achieved. On Mar 8, 2012 2:00 AM

Re: NACK reporting help

2012-03-07 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi, this is not easy to fix because you send only one but long message and awaiting only one DLR. BUT kannel splits message into peaces for you and receive two DLRs. How would you put both reason codes into one DLR? In you case that would be easy because they both equal but what do you do if

RE: NACK reporting help

2012-03-07 Thread Rene Kluwen
a failure message per message part. == Rene From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Malysh Sent: Wednesday, 07 March, 2012 13:51 To: Ashish Agarwal Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: NACK reporting help Hi, this is not easy to fix

Re: NACK reporting help

2012-03-07 Thread Ashish Agarwal
Hi, Thanks for your response but in situation where I use concatenation = true, it should be understood that I am only interested in the first report with actual NACK/xxx value. Also, in this case only one dlr is pending, which is one complete long message. whats do you say? On Mar 7, 2012 6:21

RE: NACK reporting help

2012-03-07 Thread Ashish Agarwal
: NACK reporting help ** ** Hi, ** ** this is not easy to fix because you send only one but long message and awaiting only one DLR. BUT kannel splits message into peaces for you and receive two DLRs. How would you put both reason codes into one DLR? In you case

Re: NACK reporting help

2012-03-07 Thread Rene Kluwen
That shouldn't be a problem if the dlr-url your pass is also generic. From: Ashish Agarwal [mailto:ashisha...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 07 March, 2012 15:36 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: Alexander Malysh; users@kannel.org Subject: RE: NACK reporting help I agree with you Rene, but the problem

Re: NACK reporting help

2012-03-07 Thread spameden
. This way, you will get a failure message per message part. == Rene *From:* users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] *On Behalf Of *Alexander Malysh *Sent:* Wednesday, 07 March, 2012 13:51 *To:* Ashish Agarwal *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Subject:* Re: NACK reporting help

Re: NACK reporting help

2012-03-06 Thread Ashish Agarwal
Hello All, Any update on the below query. On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Ashish Agarwal ashisha...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, I have been using kannel for over 2 years now and I am currently using the latest 1.5 version of kannel. I have come across an issue with NACK reports generated for