Re: DLRs

Dear Antony, May be this helps. The Kannel DLR mechanism works as follows: 1. Kannel sends your message in submit_sm packet to smsc. 2. SMSC replies with submit_sm_resp, witch have a *ID* in it. 3. if SMSC accepts the message, there will be an *ID *and kannel sends status=8 , kannel

RE: DLRs

ply to the SMSC. Davor -Original Message- From: users On Behalf Of Antony Stone Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 3:54 PM To: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: DLRs On Saturday 17 August 2019 at 15:48:19, Antony Stone wrote: > Indeed - if I turn off one of my kannel instances, so there i

Re: DLRs

Replying to myself in case it helps others looking for this information in future. On Saturday 17 August 2019 at 15:42:38, Antony Stone wrote: > It looks like I'm going to have to look into using a database for my DLR > storage. I do happen to have a MariaDB Galera cluster available, but I've

Re: DLRs

On Saturday 17 August 2019 at 15:48:19, Antony Stone wrote: > Indeed - if I turn off one of my kannel instances, so there is only one > running to either send or receive message to/from my SMSC provider, I get > DLR status=8 when the message is sent (with the phone turned off), and I > then get

Re: DLRs

On Saturday 17 August 2019 at 15:42:38, Antony Stone wrote: > So, it seems that kannel did receive a DLR with type=1, but then said "got > DLR but could not find message or was not interested in it". > > I've found https://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/2011-July/016176.html > which addresses

Re: DLRs

On Saturday 17 August 2019 at 14:20:36, Davor Spasoski wrote: > The smsc should send back DLR (deliver_sm pdu) on succesful delivery after > you turn on the phone. Try with a different handset and watch for the > deliver_sm pdu. Run bearerbox in debug level. > > Davor It happens that I'm

Re: DLRs

Sorry, points 10-12 were not visible on my phone. The smsc should send back DLR (deliver_sm pdu) on succesful delivery after you turn on the phone. Try with a different handset and watch for the deliver_sm pdu. Run bearerbox in debug level. Davor > On Aug 17, 2019, at 2:13 PM, Davor Spasoski

Re: DLRs

And what is wrong with that? Kannel will report every change in state as soon as the smsc reports back. The non delivery notification will be received upon expiration of the sms which depends on the validity period on the smsc or the expiration you might have set, whatever comes first. Davor

Re: DLRs getting deleted from Msql

use sqlbox for logging MO,MT,DLR On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 8:42 PM Web Min wrote: > It delete from dlr table if you are passing dlr_url to update your > original database > > in my case, I have queue table contain the status, sender_id, msg, etc... > this table is used by my portal, when I send

Re: DLRs getting deleted from Msql

It delete from dlr table if you are passing dlr_url to update your original database in my case, I have queue table contain the status, sender_id, msg, etc... this table is used by my portal, when I send an sms it insert into dlr table for while and once I received the DLR status pushed from the

Re: DLRs Routing

Check if routing delay is from telecom side (SMSC often sends DLR pretty late). It should be visible in bearerbox logs. Logically, bbox should not be delaying DLRs. On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Amelye Chatila wrote: > I experience a delay in DLRs routing. I have couple of

Re: DLRs - decoding PDU problem

I've solved the problem myself. In at2_pdu_decode function those DLRs have type 1 (AT_SUBMIT_SM) instead of 2 (AT_STATUS_REPORT_SM). Probably operator make some modifications in DLR PDUs he sends. After adding support for AT_SUBMIT_SM type there all DLRs are processed correctly again. Tomasz

Re: DLRs - decoding PDU problem

Would you post your patch so it might get included in sources? Thanks Alvaro |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú,

Re: DLRs - decoding PDU problem

Hi, I'll offer 50 EUR for the first person who will help me modify kannel sources to solve the described problem with DLRs. Tomasz W Twoim liście datowanym 30 sierpnia 2012 (12:36:59) można przeczytać: Hello, I'm using Kannel since few years as a core for gateway based on GSM modems (AT).

RE: DLRs and the http smsc

Hi Gabor, If you examine smsc_http.c you will see that status-success-regex is used only by 'system-type = generic', not by 'kannel'. Regards, James -Original Message- From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Gabor Szucs Sent: 10 May 2011 13:52 To:

Re: DLRs and the http smsc

Hi James (and list), Thanks for your comment . I realize that, and I tried the same with the 'generic' system-type, as I wrote last time - I moved on to the 'kannel' system-type based on one of the developers' reply to an earlier, similar question (I've also quoted its subject line). I also saw a

Re: DLRs for concatenated messages

Hi That is the way kannel handles dlr for concatenated messages. There has been several threads regarding how to improve this but nothing has been done. |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y

RE: DLRs for concatenated messages

: Friday, March 25, 2011 1:47 AM To: Toby Phipps Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: DLRs for concatenated messages Hi That is the way kannel handles dlr for concatenated messages. There has been several threads regarding how to improve this but nothing has been done

Re: DLRs for concatenated messages

-Original Message- From: Alvaro Cornejo [mailto:cornejo.alv...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 1:47 AM To: Toby Phipps Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: DLRs for concatenated messages Hi That is the way kannel handles dlr for concatenated messages. There has been several threads

Re: DLRs using the generic HTTP content gateway

Hi, Not with system-type generic. It doesn't provide a receive endpoint. You should use system-type kannel for that. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Garth Patil garthpa...@gmail.com To: Users mailing list users@kannel.org Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 2:52 AM Subject: DLRs

Re: DLRs SMPP 5.0 compatibility

I think you're misreading the code. The mask values are not passed to the SMPP driver as-is, but are just a way to tell the driver what to send/request. In this case, the 0x20 value means that kannel should ask for intermediate dlrs. This is not necessarily only for SMPP, other drivers might

Re: DLRs with sqlbox

works for me, but i use unique dlr-url set in sendsms request -Original Message- From: Juan Nin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 ??? 2007 ?. To: seik Subject:DLRs with sqlbox do DLRs work while using sqlbox? I see them getting inserted in sent_sms table, but the dlr_url is not

Re: DLRs

Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: Hi All, I am having problems with the DLRs. One of my providers adds a 7_ before the real message_id, so when the DLR finally arrives the number doesn´t match, so Kannel ignores it. ie: I submit a message with submit_sm and receives a submit_sm_response with: message_id:

Re: DLRs

Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: Stipe, You bet is unusual! Is madness!! :))) I've tried changing the select statement (I started with the lazy way since it´s a lot simpler to change a single sql statement thant to write real C code). But I soon found out that not only it added the 7_ stuff, but also

Re: DLRs

- From: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alejandro Guerrieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 7:26 PM Subject: Re: DLRs Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: Stipe, You bet is unusual! Is madness!! :))) I've tried changing the select statement (I started