-
From: Toby Phipps toby.phi...@nexmedia.com.sg
To: 'Rene Kluwen' rene.klu...@chimit.nl; 'Nikos Balkanas'
nbalka...@gmail.com; users@kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 8:14 AM
Subject: RE: Life without smsbox
Rene,
As the subject line suggests, I'm not actually running a smsbox
Phipps; 'Rene Kluwen'; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Life without smsbox
Nope. It disrupts architecture. Once a box receives a Msg *, it must
generate an ACK, so that bearerbox knows that it is the other box's
responsibility how to handle it and delete it from its own queue. ACK should
be returned
-
From: Toby Phipps [mailto:toby.phi...@nexmedia.com.sg]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 August, 2010 07:14
To: 'Rene Kluwen'; 'Nikos Balkanas'; users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: Life without smsbox
Rene,
As the subject line suggests, I'm not actually running a smsbox, and the
smsbox-id in both sqlbox and smsbox
Subject: RE: Life without smsbox
Rene,
As the subject line suggests, I'm not actually running a smsbox, and the
smsbox-id in both sqlbox and smsbox groups is set to the same value as
recommended by Nikos (below) in order to force the routing. Maybe I
misunderstood his directions?
In any case
should run these
changes by? I'm sure I'm not the only one that has no need for smsbox.
Thanks,
Toby.
-Original Message-
From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 9 August 2010 2:17 AM
To: Toby Phipps; 'Rene Kluwen'; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Life without smsbox
...@nexmedia.com.sg
To: 'Nikos Balkanas' nbalka...@gmail.com; 'Rene Kluwen'
rene.klu...@chimit.nl; users@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 6:17 PM
Subject: RE: Life without smsbox
Hi Nikos,
Thanks again for the feedback. You hit the nail on the head - I am seeing
WARNING: smsbox_list empty
.
Thanks,
Toby
-Original Message-
From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 August 2010 12:08 AM
To: Toby Phipps; 'Rene Kluwen'; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Life without smsbox
Hi,
You are missing an smsbox-route group. Once you configure that, your DLR
problem
: Monday, August 09, 2010 7:24 PM
Subject: RE: Life without smsbox
Hi Nikos,
I'll certainly try what you suggest, but I'm not quite sure that's the
issue. Although bearerbox may think it doesn't have any smsboxes
connected,
it's still happily routing messages to sqlbox - here's a brief extract
from
]
Sent: Monday, 09 August, 2010 18:31
To: Toby Phipps; 'Rene Kluwen'; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Life without smsbox
Nope. What you see is entirely different. send_msg is not sending the DLR to
sqlbox, but rather responding an ACK to the received MT. I don't know if
there is a problem
Please share the patch ;)
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: Toby Phipps [mailto:toby.phi...@nexmedia.com.sg]
Sent: Monday, 09 August, 2010 18:24
To: 'Nikos Balkanas'; 'Rene Kluwen'; users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: Life without smsbox
Hi Nikos,
I'll certainly try what you suggest, but I'm
: Monday, 09 August, 2010 18:54
To: 'Toby Phipps'; 'Nikos Balkanas'; users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: Life without smsbox
Please share the patch ;)
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: Toby Phipps [mailto:toby.phi...@nexmedia.com.sg]
Sent: Monday, 09 August, 2010 18:24
To: 'Nikos Balkanas'; 'Rene
AM
To: Toby Phipps; 'Rene Kluwen'; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Life without smsbox
Nope. What you see is entirely different. send_msg is not sending the DLR to
sqlbox, but rather responding an ACK to the received MT. I don't know if
there is a problem with sqlbox, but I bet I would have heard
...@nexmedia.com.sg
To: 'Nikos Balkanas' nbalka...@gmail.com; 'Rene Kluwen'
rene.klu...@chimit.nl; users@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 7:59 PM
Subject: RE: Life without smsbox
Hmm, OK. Interesting. I've reverted to the SVN head of sqlbox and
configured
the following:
group = smsbox
, 09 August, 2010 19:07
To: Toby Phipps; 'Rene Kluwen'; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Life without smsbox
I reiterate. SQLbox shouldn't have such an error. Your smsbox-route is not
correct, you need to specify smsc-id. Read User's guide about it. You should
still be getting that WARNING.
Solve
. Any suggestions or thoughts?
Thanks,
Toby.
-Original Message-
From: Rene Kluwen [mailto:rene.klu...@chimit.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 August 2010 3:56 AM
To: 'Nikos Balkanas'; 'Toby Phipps'; users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: Life without smsbox
True. You have the same smsbox-id for both smsbox
Just a follow-up - I also tried setting smsbox-id = sqlbox in the sqlbox
section, and sqlbox starts but I get the same results, which is that the
bearerbox store size increments by one for each DLR received, as viewed in
the status output. For example:
SMS: received 0 (0 queued), sent 13 (0
, 2010 3:26 PM
Subject: RE: Life without smsbox
Just a follow-up - I also tried setting smsbox-id = sqlbox in the
sqlbox
section, and sqlbox starts but I get the same results, which is that the
bearerbox store size increments by one for each DLR received, as viewed in
the status output. For example
Sent: Wednesday, 04 August, 2010 00:03
To: Toby Phipps; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Life without smsbox
Hi,
You are most wellcome.
1) That is the correct way to do it. For bearerbox, sqlbox is just another
smsbox, that needs to be configured in. sendsms-port is not relevant in this
case
Hi,
You are most wellcome.
1) That is the correct way to do it. For bearerbox, sqlbox is just another
smsbox, that needs to be configured in. sendsms-port is not relevant in this
case, but bearerbox never reads this value anyway.
2) I imagine that this has to do with sqlbox configuration,
19 matches
Mail list logo
