On 11 August 2011 03:49, Mikkel L. Ellertson mellert...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/10/2011 02:11 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
CDs are static information. If I burned a set of wavs to a CDROM we
wouldn't say, It's not a filesystem because it's audio.
It would depend on how you burned them to the
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:59:03PM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
When I updated today I got this:
Updating : glibc-2.14-5.x86_64
2/115
Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package glibc-2.14-5.x86_64
/usr/sbin/glibc_post_upgrade: While trying
On 08/01/2011 07:43 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
Just out of curiosity, are there any security/vulnerability issues presented
by a root owned flash library?
The important part is the user which runs the library, not the owner of the
file.
Almost all the files in /usr/bin or /usr/lib are root owned
shailesh kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika torstai, 11. elokuuta
2011):
[tommy@tommy cprog]$ gcc hello.c
[tommy@tommy cprog]$ ./a.out
bash: nbsp;./a.out : Permission denied
Is your cprog directory on an USB stick, external hard drive,
or some other media other than regular Linux filesystem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 11/08/2011 00:16, Rick Stevens a écrit :
Have a look at your /etc/resolv.conf and make sure it's not adding a
domain to your lookups via a search home or somesuch.
Yes it does:
domain home
search home
nameserver 192.168.1.1
OK. Now I
On 11 August 2011 10:13, Markku Kolkka mark...@tuubi.net wrote:
shailesh kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika torstai, 11. elokuuta
2011):
[tommy@tommy cprog]$ gcc hello.c
[tommy@tommy cprog]$ ./a.out
bash: nbsp;./a.out : Permission denied
Is your cprog directory on an USB stick, external
On 08/11/2011 03:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:59:03PM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
When I updated today I got this:
Updating : glibc-2.14-5.x86_64
2/115
Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package glibc-2.14-5.x86_64
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 10:21 +0530, Jatin K wrote:
you should do chmod +x a.out or run it like sh a.out
sh a.out isn't going to do anything unless a.out is a Shell script.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On Thursday 11 August 2011 05:56 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 10:21 +0530, Jatin K wrote:
you should do chmod +x a.out or run it like sh a.out
sh a.out isn't going to do anything unless a.out is a Shell script.
poc
I assumed it is shell script. so
--
°v°
Hello,
Today after power on my work computer and log in I get this message:
Oh no! Something has gone wrong.
A problem has ocurred and the system can't recover.
Please log out and try again.
I tried log out and log in again but nothing happen. What could be doing
this?
The system is
On 11/08/11 14:14, Lázaro Morales wrote:
I tried log out and log in again but nothing happen. What could be doing
this?
This usually caused by incompatible theme/extension.
You can try the followings:
Press CTRL+ALT+F2 then login
1. Remove all gnome-shell extension and theme as root
Hi all,
I recently purchased my first SSD (a 256MB M4) and in setting it up stumbled
across all the writings about tuning SSDs for linux. One of the main things
that received a lot of attention was the filesystem alignment/erase block
stuff.
One post I read was that ubuntu's natty installer took
On 08/10/2011 11:00 PM, Amos Shapira wrote:
Some more research after I sent my question (narrower search terms)
found the following bug and fix:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624442
The package I use is centos-ds-base-8.1.0-0.14.el5.centos.2
Does this mean that this is a bug in
Thanks gpe,
1. Remove all gnome-shell extension and theme as root
yum remove gnome-shell-extension* gnome-shell-theme*
or
I don't have any extension or theme installed.
2. Create a new user account as root and try to login
useradd test1
passwd test1
I tried
On 08/11/2011 02:46 PM, patrick korsnick wrote:
I recently purchased my first SSD (a 256MB M4) and in setting it up stumbled
across all the writings about tuning SSDs for linux. One of the main things
that
received a lot of attention was the filesystem alignment/erase block stuff.
One
On 11/08/11 14:54, Lázaro Morales wrote:
2. Create a new user account as root and try to login
useradd test1
passwd test1
The first command creates a new user account, the second sets the
password for it. Make sure you run those commands as root. (su)
If you have the new account
Hi. I'm running F15 and have been using BackupPC successfully for
years. I rebooted my computer this morning and noticed that BackupPC
failed to start. Its log file has this:
2011-08-11 08:00:25 Reading hosts file
2011-08-11 08:00:25 unix bind() failed: No such file or directory
But the hosts
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 18:06 +0530, Jatin K wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2011 05:56 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 10:21 +0530, Jatin K wrote:
you should do chmod +x a.out or run it like sh a.out
sh a.out isn't going to do anything unless a.out is a Shell script.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Reid Rivenburgh re...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi. I'm running F15 and have been using BackupPC successfully for
years. I rebooted my computer this morning and noticed that BackupPC
failed to start. Its log file has this:
2011-08-11 08:00:25 Reading hosts file
Well I never have used BackupPC software but for me the problem is not the
hosts file.
I think the program is trying to open a UNIX socket file and for some reason
(the directory where the file should reside no longer exists or some
permission problems) is failing.
I was able to replicate you
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Reid Rivenburgh re...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi. I'm running F15 and have been using BackupPC successfully for
years. I rebooted my computer this morning and noticed that BackupPC
failed to
Ah, that's a good point, those two lines of the LOG file may not be
related, which would be misleading. I should check if any sockets are
being created. Thanks for the tip.
Reid
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:55 AM, j.e.aneiros jesus.anei...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I never have used BackupPC
On a side note, I think the current 3.2.1 release has some SELinux
issues. I updated mine based on the SEAlterts and created my own
package. I sent my updates to the package maintainer for Fedora but I
do not believe he's incorporated them yet.
Richard
--
users mailing list
It looks like I needed to create /var/run/BackupPC, owned by account
backuppc. I notice in the changelog for the most recent package that
the socket creation was moved there, but it seems it didn't make sure
the directory exists.
Reid
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Reid Rivenburgh
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Reid Rivenburgh re...@pobox.com wrote:
It looks like I needed to create /var/run/BackupPC, owned by account
backuppc. I notice in the changelog for the most recent package that
the socket creation was moved there, but it seems it didn't make sure
the
On 08/11/2011 07:27 AM, gpe wrote:
Another question. How up-to-date is your system? It is always good idea
to do an
yum update
as root and then
reboot
Rebooting after a system update is so...so...*Windows!* Unless there's
a kernel update there's no need and if your DE is updated or part of
[joe@khorlia ~]$ uptime
09:30:56 up 57 days, 16:51, 2 users, load average: 0.76, 0.72, 0.67
[joe@khorlia ~]$
17:43:49 up 167 days, 1:41, 8 users, load average: 0.09, 0.11, 0.13
Difficult to do much more than that with Fedora however given the 6
monthly cycle however.
A reboot is
I've been using Gnome Shell since the alphas of F15 and I keep hoping
that a few things get fixed. I don't know if they're general problems
or widespread. I've make a point of putting things in Bugzilla. But, my
problems are not going away.
Big problems:
1. Pressing ALT-TAB crashes the shell.
On 08/11/2011 12:44 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
I've been using Gnome Shell since the alphas of F15 and I keep hoping
that a few things get fixed. I don't know if they're general problems
or widespread. I've make a point of putting things in Bugzilla. But, my
problems are not going away.
Maybe
On 08/11/2011 10:31 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 08/11/2011 07:27 AM, gpe wrote:
Another question. How up-to-date is your system? It is always good idea
to do an
yum update
as root and then
reboot
Rebooting after a system update is so...so...*Windows!*
So is the error message the OP received
On 08/11/2011 09:44 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
I've make a point of putting things in Bugzilla.
You might do better if you use Gnome's Bugzilla at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/index.cgi instead. And, I question your
statement that Gnome Shell is the future of Fedora, because I've seen
a number of
On 08/11/2011 11:52 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
On 08/11/2011 12:44 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
I've been using Gnome Shell since the alphas of F15 and I keep hoping
that a few things get fixed. I don't know if they're general problems
or widespread. I've make a point of putting things in
Where do I fine tune the default system colors. I'm referring to where GTK-
based apps get the default colors for their widgets and backgrounds.
gnome-tweak-tool lets me make some wholesale changes and select a couple of
themes. As an aside, there's a gtk+ theme in the tab called Interface,
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 12:00 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
On 08/11/2011 11:52 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
On 08/11/2011 12:44 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
I've been using Gnome Shell since the alphas of F15 and I keep hoping
that a few things get fixed. I don't know if they're general
On 11 August 2011 18:00, Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com wrote:
On 08/11/2011 11:52 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
On 08/11/2011 12:44 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
I've been using Gnome Shell since the alphas of F15 and I keep hoping
that a few things get fixed. I don't know if
On 11 August 2011 17:59, Joe Zeff j...@zeff.us wrote:
On 08/11/2011 09:44 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
I've make a point of putting things in Bugzilla.
And, I question your
statement that Gnome Shell is the future of Fedora, because I've seen
a number of posts both here and at fedoraforum.org
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:18:27 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Where do I fine tune the default system colors. I'm referring to where GTK-
based apps get the default colors for their widgets and backgrounds.
I hated the selection colors and finally tracked them down to the
files
On 08/11/2011 01:36 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:18:27 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Where do I fine tune the default system colors. I'm referring to where GTK-
based apps get the default colors for their widgets and backgrounds.
I hated the selection colors and finally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/11/2011 12:06 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On a side note, I think the current 3.2.1 release has some SELinux
issues. I updated mine based on the SEAlterts and created my own
package. I sent my updates to the package maintainer for Fedora but
I
On 08/11/2011 10:33 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
Personally I'm going to stick it out for a while.
No reason not to if, on the whole, it does what you want the way you
want it to. That's one of the great things about Linux: there's not One
True Way that everybody has to do things whether they want
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/11/2011 12:06 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On a side note, I think the current 3.2.1 release has some SELinux
issues. I updated mine based on the SEAlterts and created my own
package. I sent my updates to the package
On 08/11/2011 10:39 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:38:07 -0430
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Besides which, a shell script named a.out would arouse my suspicions.
Although not illegal, I would regard it as an attempted Trojan.
a.out is the default name of the executable file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/11/2011 02:04 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 08/11/2011 12:06 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On a side note, I think the current 3.2.1 release has some
SELinux issues. I updated
Am 11.08.2011 18:52, schrieb Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak:
On 08/11/2011 12:44 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
I've been using Gnome Shell since the alphas of F15 and I keep hoping
that a few things get fixed. I don't know if they're general problems
or widespread. I've make a point of putting things
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:45:03 -0400
Genes MailLists wrote:
That is really quite sad that you have to resort to that ... congrats
on managing to find AWFGP 8-)
[1] another work around for Gnome Poop
You just have to think about it as a game - its fun! (Actually I have
a bunch of other
On 08/11/2011 02:51 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:45:03 -0400
Genes MailLists wrote:
That is really quite sad that you have to resort to that ... congrats
on managing to find AWFGP 8-)
[1] another work around for Gnome Poop
You just have to think about it as a game -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
On a Toshiba laptop, I have an integrated TV card which is strangely not
recognised by udev, but which install the correct kernel module
specified by lspci.
lspci gives:
02:09.0 0400: 14f1:5b7a
Subsystem: 1179:0010
Flags:
On 08/11/2011 01:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Maybe try another video card (one that uses a different driver)
it is simply UNACCEPTABLE writing a linux-desktop where you have
troubles with most video cards. there are enough of them where
Luckily, gnome-shell works with most video cards, so
are borked with a standard-desktop because some developers
are thinking it is cool rely on 3D-crap
The sad thing is almost none of the 3D dependancies are remotely
necessary as far as I can see - just about every 'clever' effect it has
Enlightenments Evas seems to do faster while abstracting
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:08:35 +0100
Alan Cox wrote:
The sad thing is almost none of the 3D dependancies are remotely
necessary as far as I can see - just about every 'clever' effect it has
Enlightenments Evas seems to do faster while abstracting the canvas
underneath to work with just about
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:55:51 +0200
François Patte wrote:
Is there a way to tell udev to ignore this hardware and skip anything
regarding it.
I have often wondered this as well. I wish there were some way
to specify PCI device IDs to be skipped on the kernel command
line so the kernel would
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:49 PM, arag...@dcsnow.com
wrote:
Anyway, I found that I have multiple
mount points that I didn't define
in
the
install and are not in fstab. Is there an easy way to get rid of
the
duplication? A quick Google search
suggested disabling sandbox but I
take a
On 08/11/2011 04:10 PM, arag...@dcsnow.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:49 PM, arag...@dcsnow.com wrote:
Anyway, I found that I have multiple mount points that I didn't define
in
the install and are not in fstab. Is there an easy way to get rid of
the
duplication? A quick Google
I'm having a blonde moment. I need to add a network device alias on a
Fedora 14 box.
The proper way that is documented is to add a ifcfg-eth0:0 file with the
IP inside and call it done. This isn't working for me. When I restart
the network service the alias is not brought up.
Fedora 14
Hi Folks,
I'll try and keep this long story short, and explain the subject line,
Yesterday I was given a Compag Presario F700 laptop. It was running
Vista with problems of intermittant hanging.
I tested the memory with memtest86+ for 6+ hours (11 complete passes,
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:44 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
I've been using Gnome Shell since the alphas of F15 and I keep hoping
that a few things get fixed. I don't know if they're general problems
or widespread. I've make a point of putting things in Bugzilla. But, my
problems are not going
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:05 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 08/11/2011 10:39 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:38:07 -0430
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Besides which, a shell script named a.out would arouse my suspicions.
Although not illegal, I would regard it as an attempted Trojan.
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Is there something I'm missing?
It seems NetworkManager doesn't support[1] alias files.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443968
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
I have enabled the DHCP server using
systemctl start dhcpd.service
I have a pretty simple dhcp.conf which looks like this:
ddns-update-style interim;
ignore client-updates;
subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
option routers 192.168.2.1;
option
On 08/11/2011 01:26 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'll try and keep this long story short, and explain the subject line,
Yesterday I was given a Compag Presario F700 laptop. It was running
Vista with problems of intermittant hanging.
I tested the memory
On 8/11/2011 5:28 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
I have enabled the DHCP server using
systemctl start dhcpd.service
..snip the rest..
I left out the main point, the nature of the problem. The server doesn't
seem to work, and addresses are not being handed out. This had been
working
On 08/11/2011 03:37 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:44 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
I've been using Gnome Shell since the alphas of F15 and I keep hoping
that a few things get fixed. I don't know if they're general problems
or widespread. I've make a point of putting things in
On 08/11/2011 02:27 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:55:51 +0200
François Patte wrote:
Is there a way to tell udev to ignore this hardware and skip anything
regarding it.
I have often wondered this as well. I wish there were some way
to specify PCI device IDs to be skipped
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:59:55 -0400
Claude Jones wrote:
I left out the main point, the nature of the problem. The server doesn't
seem to work, and addresses are not being handed out.
You might try restarting it after the system is well and truly up.
I have problems with lots of network based
On Aug 11, 2011 6:03 PM, Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com
wrote:
On 08/11/2011 03:37 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:44 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
I've been using Gnome Shell since the alphas of F15 and I keep hoping
that a few things get fixed. I don't know
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:10 PM, arag...@dcsnow.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:49 PM, arag...@dcsnow.com wrote:
Anyway, I found that I have multiple mount points that I didn't define
in
the install and are not in fstab. Is there an easy way to get rid of
the
duplication? A quick
On 08/11/2011 05:42 PM, Paul Morgan wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011 6:03 PM, Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com
mailto:subscribed-li...@sterndata.com wrote:
On 08/11/2011 03:37 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:44 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
I've been using Gnome Shell
On 08/12/2011 06:30 AM, Anthony Messina wrote:
On 08/11/2011 02:27 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:55:51 +0200
François Patte wrote:
Is there a way to tell udev to ignore this hardware and skip anything
regarding it.
I have often wondered this as well. I wish there were some
On 08/11/2011 06:42 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:59:55 -0400
Claude Jones wrote:
I left out the main point, the nature of the problem. The server doesn't
seem to work, and addresses are not being handed out.
You might try restarting it after the system is well and truly
Hi,
No, I understand that. My question was, if I had some software that
used GTK1, which I use, and would not like to spend time writing
for GTK2, would I still be able to compile using GTK2 or GTK3? Is GTK3/2
a superset of GTK1?
No it isn't.
After all, this is the wrong list for questions
On 08/11/2011 06:49 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
I'm now using XFCE with AWN. I do like some eye candy and a Mac-like
desktop. I'll switch back to Gnome when I see yum dropping off a new
version of the shell.
Meantime, I'm trying to figure out how to get the media keys on my
keyboard to work
I appreciate Rick thinking to mention /etc/resolv.conf. I tend to
forget it, especially since Fedora currently does so much (partial)
hand-holding with the network setup widgets.
(Reindl is going to complain about my monologues again here, I'm afraid.)
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:02 PM, François
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:26:50 -0400
Genes MailLists wrote:
Better would be to somehow figure out (outside of systemd) which
services are actually not really running - and restart those.
Unfortunately, most of the services I have problems with appear
to be really running, they just don't work
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 09:59 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
I question your statement that Gnome Shell is the future of Fedora,
because I've seen a number of posts both here and at fedoraforum.org
from people like me who still use Fedora but have jumped ship on
Gnome.
Sometimes the answer with bad
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:08:35 +0100
Alan Cox wrote:
The sad thing is almost none of the 3D dependancies are remotely
necessary as far as I can see - just about every 'clever' effect it has
Enlightenments Evas seems to do faster while abstracting the canvas
underneath to work with just about
On 08/11/2011 05:44 PM, Tim wrote:
This isn't Windows, and we're not Windows users.
And even if large numbers of us jump ship and go to a different DE, the
Gnome devs won't care as long as there are Gnome-centric distros out
there. They know that most newcomers to Linux will take whatever DE
On 08/11/2011 04:54 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
I appreciate Rick thinking to mention /etc/resolv.conf. I tend to
forget it, especially since Fedora currently does so much (partial)
hand-holding with the network setup widgets.
(Reindl is going to complain about my monologues again here, I'm
On 08/11/2011 07:54 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:26:50 -0400
Genes MailLists wrote:
Better would be to somehow figure out (outside of systemd) which
services are actually not really running - and restart those.
Unfortunately, most of the services I have problems with
Once upon a time, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com said:
There is a reason for this, Joel. Most ISPs that deal with home users
use a loop polling mechanism to pick up data from end users and ship it
to the internet. It's not like a normal network connection. They're
optimized for minimal upload,
Well, it's not perfect. libflashplayer.so copied into the unprivileged
user's .mozilla/plugins, but ALSA or PulseAudio gags:
[user9@fed ~]$ bin/localff user9-boxed
non-network local connections being added to access control list
ALSA lib pulse.c:229:(pulse_connect) PulseAudio: Unable to connect:
I can't get the wireless working in Fedora 15 on an HP Mini 210. It has an
Ralink rt5390 chipset, which I'm not familiar with at all. I've been
following the instructions on this
pagehttp://atinfinity.wordpress.com/2011/05/21/ralink-rt5390-wi-fi-driver-on-ubuntu-11-04/.
I figured they would work
Oh, for ...
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 16:17 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
It should be possible to write a FUSE wrapper that would let you do
the desktop-interface trick as a proper mount. Not that I'm
volunteering.
It has been
On Thursday, August 11, 2011, Tom Horsley wrote:
I left out the main point, the nature of the problem. The
server doesn't seem to work, and addresses are not being
handed out.
You might try restarting it after the system is well and truly
up
I did try that, actually. But, I didn't stop
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
mellert...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/10/2011 02:11 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
CDs are static information. If I burned a set of wavs to a CDROM we
wouldn't say, It's not a filesystem because it's
On 08/11/2011 10:44 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
Anyone have any familiarity with the omshell command and it's readout?
The command is cited right in the DHCP section of the Fedora 15
documentation - I read the man page for it but it's a bit difficult to
grok...
Probably a bit obvious -
Hi, I was Wondering if there was a tool for Linux in general
that let me undo the system changes at reboot or something
like that, For example:
I want to set a standard configuration in a machine and then
let that machine to be used by many users, but as soon as
the user Log Out (preferably in
/*** original message with some information removed /
Hi, I was Wondering if there was a tool for Linux in general
that let me undo the system changes at reboot or something
like that, For example:
I want to set a standard configuration in a machine and then
let that machine
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:57:18 -0500
Manuel Escudero wrote:
Hi, I was Wondering if there was a tool for Linux in general
that let me undo the system changes at reboot or something
like that,
Generally speaking, users can only write files in their home directory. So if
you restore the home
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 22:57:18 -0500,
Manuel Escudero jmlev...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to set a standard configuration in a machine and then
let that machine to be used by many users, but as soon as
the user Log Out (preferably in that moment)
I want the machine to undo all the possible
On Thursday 11 August 2011 08:38 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 18:06 +0530, Jatin K wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2011 05:56 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 10:21 +0530, Jatin K wrote:
you should do chmod +x a.out or run it like sh a.out
sh a.out
2011/8/11 Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:57:18 -0500
Manuel Escudero wrote:
Hi, I was Wondering if there was a tool for Linux in general
that let me undo the system changes at reboot or something
like that,
Generally speaking, users can only write files in their
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:27:41 -0500 Clemens Eisserer
linuxhi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
No, I understand that. My question was, if I had some software that
used GTK1, which I use, and would not like to spend time writing
for GTK2, would I still be able to compile using GTK2 or GTK3? Is GTK3/2
92 matches
Mail list logo
