Re: what does @@ -112,14 +107,14 @@ double sqrt_rn(double x) mean?

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 05:04:16PM -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote: > @@ -112,14 +107,14 @@ double sqrt_rn(double x) > I'm running fedora 35. > The line is part of the output from > git diff -w proof -- > dif.out > for sqrt_rn.c . > It seems a random insertion. > The @@'s and between them are in

Re: Deprecating SCP

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 03:44:39PM +0100, Jakub Jelen wrote: > Over the last years, there were several issues in the SCP protocol, which > lead us into discussions if we can get rid of it in upstream [1]. Most of > the voices there said that they use SCP mostly for simple ad-hoc copy and > because

Re: gcc/sort

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 02:22:03PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > After sorting the list is: > > 0 -5.5e-06 3 25 56 88 100 > > -5.5e-06 2 3 25 56 88 100 > > > #include > #include > > double values[] = { 88, 56, 100, 0.0, 25, 3, -0.55e-5 }; > double values2 [] = { 88, 56, 100, 2, 25, 3,

Re: gcc vs gfortran

On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 06:12:28PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Actually, this is what I have: > > in C > > double complex a, b, z > int lnchf ip > out = conhyp_ (, , , , ) ; The above isn't very close to C, e.g. ; is missing at the end of first line, , and ; are missing around ip on the

Re: nothing provides libgfortran.so.4

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 11:30:05AM +0100, Paul Smith wrote: > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Paul Smith wrote: > > > > When trying to install > > > > R-mvtnorm > > > > I get the following error: > > > > - > > # dnf install R-mvtnorm > > Failed to

Re: Reports of gcc8 vector-validation problems in F28

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 10:40:39AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote: > On 07/05/18 10:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 09:51:52AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote: > > > The MythTV lists have had several reports of problems apparently arising > > > fro

Re: Reports of gcc8 vector-validation problems in F28

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 09:51:52AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote: > The MythTV lists have had several reports of problems apparently arising > from new (and improved) vector-validation in gcc8. Is there a temporary > workaround? If you don't provide details (links to the reports, etc.), then it

Re: dnf installs gcc 7.3.1 but gcc.gnu.org provides only 7.3.0

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:26:23AM +0100, Frédéric wrote: > > 7.3.1 is a version used for 7 branch snapshots in between 7.3 and 7.4 > > releases, which is what we are shipping in Fedora. The version also > > includes the date when the snapshot has been made. > > You mean that all snapshots are

Re: dnf installs gcc 7.3.1 but gcc.gnu.org provides only 7.3.0

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:39:55PM +0100, Frédéric wrote: > How is it possible that dnf installs gcc 7.3.1 when only 7.3.0 exists > on gcc.gnu.org? Read https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/develop.html "Version Numbering Scheme for GCC 5 and Up" part? 7.3.1 is a version used for 7 branch snapshots

Re: gcc

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 07:57:17PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > I would like that gcc generates an error (and not a warning), > when there is a call to a non predeclared function. In C? -Werror=implicit-function-declaration or -pedantic-errors (if in c99 or later mode, which is the

Re: gcc warning and errors

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:47:30AM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I have a Makefile (gcc) generating a lot of warnings. Hence, it is difficult > to see the error message. > How can I have the gcc error message in red? GCC does this by default if stderr is a terminal (capable of displaying colors).

Re: (f23) no more prelink?

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:08:59AM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > Not to mention that with library randomization, it was utterly > and completely useless. It prelinked libs to load at a particular > address, then the kernel loaded them at another random address, > thus requiring relocation anyway.

Re: F20 install compat-gcc-34-g77 conflicts (worked around)

On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:12:14AM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 07:36:13 -0600 Stephen Berg (Contractor) stephen.berg@nrlssc.navy.mil wrote: On 01/06/2014 07:15 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 01/06/14 21:00, Stephen Berg (Contractor) wrote: Trying to get

Re: exp10

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 01:22:16PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, when I do man exp10, it appears that this function should be in the math library. You are clearly missing the #define _GNU_SOURCE /* See feature_test_macros(7) */ #include math.h at the beginning of

Re: omp_get_thread_num

On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 05:25:09PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: In Fedora 16, I used to use a call to the function: omp_get_thread_num which was probably provided by one on the openmotif package. I cannot find such a library anywhere now. You have OpenMP code than, so either compile/link with

Re: Compile 32bit or 64bit

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 02:06:10AM -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Mahdi Foladgar folad...@gmail.com wrote: I have two computer installed FC16 on them. On the First FC16x86-64 installed and on the other FC16-i386 installed. Can I compile some program on one

Re: Fedora - time to blink

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:08:16AM +, Ian Malone wrote: still has to sit within that. Hebron as a time zone, no idea why Fedora has it, nor why the author takes particular exception to it, don't care. That guy clearly should read /usr/share/doc/tzdata-2011n/Theory which explains why cities

Re: Fedora - time to blink

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 08:41:08AM -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: That guy clearly should read /usr/share/doc/tzdata-2011n/Theory which explains why cities are chosen instead of region names and when new timezones need to be added (as has Asia/Hebron been recently added). Asia/Jerusalem is

Re: Fedora - time to blink

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:08:54PM +, JB wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 08:41:08AM -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: That guy clearly should read /usr/share/doc/tzdata-2011n/Theory which explains why cities are chosen instead of region names and when new timezones need to be added (as

Re: glibc scriptlet failure on todays f15 update

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:59:03PM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: When I updated today I got this: Updating : glibc-2.14-5.x86_64 2/115 Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package glibc-2.14-5.x86_64 /usr/sbin/glibc_post_upgrade: While trying

Re: Cannot recompile grub - checking whether the C compiler works... no

On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:41:41PM +0200, Joshua C. wrote: 2011/6/12 Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com: As the subject says I cannot recompile grub. Everytime I get checking whether the C compiler works... no. I explicitely installed all packages from

Re: problem wth sort utility?

On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 07:16:29PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: Both space and tab sort lexically before digits (which start at 48 for 0). If you're using another whitespace codepoint by accident then it will probably come above the digits and thus change the sort result. That's true only in

Re: glibc-devel missing gnu/stubs-32.h

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:08:36PM -0700, Mike Wright wrote: I'm trying to compile xen-4.1.1 on f14 and it is failing saying /usr/include/gnu/stubs-32.h no such file. yum whatprovides stubs-32.h: glibc-devel (installed but doesn't have that file). Is this a packaging error in

Re: OK, why does the glibc rpm need to execute /sbin/service?

On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 06:39:47PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: Updating : glibc-2.14-2.x86_64 3/106 Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package glibc-2.14-2.x86_64 /usr/sbin/glibc_post_upgrade: While trying to execute /sbin/service child

Re: I Installed gcc using yum install gcc, Where can I find the Header files Declarations

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:04:34PM +0530, Varuna Seneviratna wrote: On 14 May 2011 12:02, Larry Brower la...@maxqe.com wrote: float.h is C Header File why isn't it included when GCC is installed gcc provides float.h: rpm -q gcc; rpm -ql gcc | grep float gcc-4.6.0-6.fc15.x86_64

Re: compile 32 bit on 64 bit machine

On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:01:13PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I am trying to compile a very simple application on a 64 bit machine which may run on a 32 bit machine. gcc -m32 ttt.c gives me an error: In file included from /usr/include/features.h:385, from

Re: Any arguments for keeping Yum case-sensitive?

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:07:35AM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote: I cannot reproduce that: That's because you forgot to call setlocale (LC_ALL, ); first. Without that the comparison is done in C locale always. #include wchar.h #include stdio.h int main () { printf(%d\n, wcscasecmp

Re: Any arguments for keeping Yum case-sensitive?

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 07:01:20PM +, Alan Cox wrote: Do you say package names change with each language?. No but the question is abcde the same as ABCDE except for case does In most locales abcde and ABCDE is the same when doing case insensitive comparison, but e.g. wcscasecmp (Lhijkl,

Re: sort wierdness

On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 12:47:18PM +, Neil Bird wrote: I am seeing sort treat '@' specially; in particular, it wanders around the sort order depending upon the rest of the input line. Anyone have an explanation? I guess it's something to do with locale, but the input strings

Re: Difference between g++ and c++?

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:07:01PM +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: In F12, I installed gcc-c++, containing /usr/bin/g++ and /usr/bin/c++: comparing both, getting the result: these files are identical. Why then c++ is not a link to g++? Are there important philosophical or historical reasons? It