The Fedora 31 qcow2 cloud image e.g.
http://mirrors.rit.edu/fedora/fedora/linux/releases/31/Cloud/x86_64/images/
was built with a buggy grub bootloader which causes problems like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1669252
How do I request a new Fedora 31 cloud image to be built and
On 08/15/2018 10:56 AM, David Boreham wrote:
On 8/15/2018 10:36 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Updating the csn generator and the uuid generator will cause a lot of
churn in dse.ldif. There are other housekeeping tasks which will
write dse.ldif
But if those things were being done so
On 08/15/2018 10:13 AM, David Boreham wrote:
in strace.log:
[pid 8088] 12:55:39.739539 poll([{fd=435, events=POLLOUT}], 1, 180
[pid 8058] 12:55:39.739573 <... write resumed> ) = 1 <0.87>
[pid 8088] 12:55:39.739723 <... poll resumed> ) = 1 ([{fd=435,
revents=POLLOUT}]) <0.000168>
I keep getting this error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/rmeggins/scripts/repltest.py", line 53, in
m1 = tools.DirSrvTools.createInstance(createargs)
File "/home/rmeggins/ds/ds.git/src/lib389/lib389/tools.py", line 627,
in createInstance
cfgdn = lib389.CFGSUFFIX
On 03/31/2017 07:58 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
On 03/30/2017 09:05 PM, William Brown wrote:
On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 15:16 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Just curious if anyone is building 389 on HPUX? There is very old code
in our server that is specific to HPUX that we'd like to remove. Most
of
On 02/23/2017 01:11 AM, William Brown wrote:
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 22:20 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 02/22/2017 09:25 PM, William Brown wrote:
Default indexes only apply to new databases (It's a template iirc). You
need to edit the index on the cn=userRoot,cn=ldbm
On 11/15/2016 05:51 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 11/15/2016 12:08 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
It is also useful to get a few stacktraces which will give us
detailed information about what the server is doing. For example, if
you can "catch" the server while it is misbehavin
On 11/15/2016 12:58 PM, Marc Sauton wrote:
What is the test filter like?
Can we see a sanitized sample of the access log with the SRCH and RESULT?
If using SSL, review the output of
cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
Do we have replication? (and large attribute values?)
You may want to
On 06/19/2016 06:18 AM, kash...@arissystem.com wrote:
In a normal setup environment I have created an organizationUnit named View,
which is an nsView object. using nsViewFilter, I have several users in this
organizationUnit. I can bind to these users with their actual DN with no
problem :
AM, Rich Megginson <rmegg...@redhat.com
<mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 05/17/2016 02:04 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
We run a cluster of directory servers (4 masters, 2 hubs, 14 slaves)
behind a set of F5 Bigip load balancers. Our Bigip admins recently
decided to switch the b
On 05/17/2016 02:04 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
We run a cluster of directory servers (4 masters, 2 hubs, 14 slaves)
behind a set of F5 Bigip load balancers. Our Bigip admins recently
decided to switch the boxes to "one-armed" mode and that services
would have to use X-Forwarded-For headers or
On 05/17/2016 08:01 AM, Alberto Viana wrote:
Noriko,
Just to let you know, after I replicated/created the exactly same OU
structure on both side, the replication seems to works fine. I'm still
not sure that is the expected behavior:
Yes, it is. Winsync does _not_ sync the OU structure -
On 04/25/2016 01:24 PM, ghiureai wrote:
Hello List,
I am running some search performance tests , basic ldapsearch
augument "cn" , on local ldap host with rsearch, and
seeing readwaiters: values chainng , here is a sample from dbmon
This is not from dbmon. This is from cn=monitor:
On 04/07/2016 10:45 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Hello Gurus,
I was searching the web for some scripts to monitor DS performance ,
and found the Open Ldap: ldap-ping.pl script,
I wonder if there is a version for 389-DS or if are other similar
performance measure scripts available for 389-ds?
Looks
On 03/30/2016 06:45 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 31 Mar 2016, at 12:25 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
[30/Mar/2016:17:19:19 +] setup_ol_tls_conn - failed: unable to create new
TLS context
[30/Mar/2016:17:19:19 +] slapi_ldap_bind - Error: could not configure the
server
On 03/08/2016 03:36 PM, liblfds admin wrote:
On 08/03/16 22:35, Howard Chu wrote:
Even though it's a VM, numactl -H may still show something relevant.
I'll try it next time I have one running.
BerkeleyDB did adaptive locking, using a spinlock before falling back to
a heavier weight system
On 02/18/2016 02:52 PM, jfill...@central1.com wrote:
Hi Rich,
Is the code your referenced found in 389-ds-base-1.2.11 ?
yes
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/ds.git/tree/ldap/servers/plugins/syntaxes/cis.c?h=389-ds-base-1.2.11#n694
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@%(host_name)s
On 01/25/2016 02:59 AM, Mor Ndoye wrote:
Hi,
Using WinSync, is there any way to synchronize Active Directory custom
extension attributes. Here is what I read from the Red Hat documentation:
Only a subset of Directory Server and Active Directory attributes are
synchronized. These attributes
valid algorithm" but it looks as though
that is the root cause. The console doesn't know what to do with that
error, so it asks you to select another cert, which is just a
distraction at that point. Please open a ticket.
Thanks, Phil
- On 4 Jan, 2016, at 15:50, Rich Meggi
On 12/14/2015 11:16 PM, Frank Munsche wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm trying to understand why ldapsearch returns some objects of the
dit only
when the dn is set to the object I'm looking for and the search scope
has to
be base, e.g.:
There is an object at the dn: cn=repl keep alive
On 12/02/2015 09:58 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Hi Rich,
Yes I totally agree I should see the prompt as you put here, this is
working in my case only when running:
setup-ds.pl -u
but not for ds-admin.
If you are (or can find) a perl hacker, you can use perl -d
/usr/sbin/setup-ds-admin.pl and see
On 12/01/2015 03:07 PM, ghiureai wrote:
Rich, still see bellow : and bellow only for ds no admin
_setup-ds-admin.pl -u -d_
==
This program will set up the 389 Directory and Administration Servers.
It is
On 12/01/2015 11:42 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Thank you Rich for reply one more related issues I see :
When need to run the ds admin update I do not see the options for
update, seems goes back and asks all the Q's as a new fresh
installation ( ??)
setup-ds-admin.pl -u
What we are missing
On 12/01/2015 02:23 PM, ghiureai wrote:
On 12/01/2015 11:42 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Rich, pls see the answers to your Q's ( the DS upgrade worked but
the DS Admin set up will not behave same way )
...
On 12/01/2015 10:07 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Hi List,
we are tying to upgrade to 389-ds 1.3.4 from 1.2.2 , after rpm
installed and update the server , when restarting the DS geting the
following in DS errorlog, there is no such "entryallowWeakCipher" in
cfg file , what should we dissable see
On 11/24/2015 10:28 AM, ghiureai wrote:
On 11/24/2015 09:11 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 11/24/2015 10:02 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Rich and the List Thank for your continue support,
We are still seeing a index issues with memberof plugging, we are
not sure at this point if this is related
On 11/19/2015 10:02 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Rich the version for 389-base is :( I know is old ,we are planing
upgrading in next future, but I do not see this messages on all DS
hosts running same DS version)
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-34.el6_5.x86_64
Not sure. Either this is something we fixed
On 11/19/2015 09:00 AM, ghiureai wrote:
HI LIst,
I am looking for clues to solve this messages after a export or DS
reboot we are seeing this messages,
I checked the 2 plugins: caseExactString and CaseIgnore String theya
re both enabled , where else should I look?
DS version:
to had been written to
both masters in the master replication configuration when the problem
occurred but because there were multiple clients concurrently
accessing the servers it is hard to figure out what triggered the issue.
Adrian
On 11/09/2015 05:06 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 11/09/20
the amount of replication traffic and
replication processing, and let the slave calculate the memberOf values.
As far as the original issue - if we can't get enough information to
diagnose/reproduce the problem, then we can be of little help.
Thanks a lot
Isabella
On 11/10/2015 09:23 AM, Rich
On 11/09/2015 11:05 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Hi List,
We have cfg multimaster replication /fractional replication memberof
plugging excluded ,we are seeing from time to time index
corruption with some indexes , there is a strong feeling from
developers this are related to DS multimaster
On 11/09/2015 05:47 PM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote:
Hi Rich,
Thank you for your feedback , as always greatly appreciate when comes from
389-DS RH support.
We are not using vm just plain hardware, here is the description I got from developers team
related to the issues they are seeing when
On 10/21/2015 01:00 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote:
On 20/10/15 15:57, Mark Reynolds wrote:
On 10/20/2015 09:37 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote:
Hi!
We are using using nsAccountLock=true to lock user accounts. We also
have dovecot authenticating users against the 389DS.
If we set nsAccountLock=true,
On 10/19/2015 09:43 AM, Mayberry, Alexander wrote:
We refer to a dedicated consumer as "read only". (we use these in our security
zones.)
Though, I'm sure that's probably not strictly true, it captures the spirit of
things.
Yes. What the console means by "dedicated consumer" is a read only
, thread resource, CPU, file descriptor, etc. limits long
before that.
Thanks.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Rich Megginson <rmegg...@redhat.com
<mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 10/19/2015 09:43 AM, Mayberry, Alexander wrote:
We refer to a dedicated consu
On 10/09/2015 12:33 AM, Juan Ramón Moral wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to change config to make uid case insensitive?
this search return no entries.
ldapsearch -x -D "uid=*U*ser01,cn=users,dc=XXX,dc=XXX" -w XXX -s base
-b "cn=users,dc=XXX,dc=XXX"
ldap_bind: No such object (32)
matched
On 10/07/2015 02:45 PM, Paul Whitney wrote:
When SSL-enabling the directory server, am I allowed to use a wildcard
certificate or is it mandatory the certificate include the FQHN?
You can use a wildcard, but you are strongly recommended to use subject
alt name instead.
Thanks,
Paul M.
On 10/07/2015 08:34 AM, Karel Lang AFD wrote:
hi,
In reply to my own question (presented as topic no. 1 in vol.125 -see
below- chainmail):
It is solved, problem is the script, that is recommended by fedora
wiki (setupssl2.sh) as a way for automatic SSL generation for 389-DS
server, is not
md-memberof
Thank you
Isabella
On 10/01/2015 11:20 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 10/01/2015 12:06 PM, ghiureai wrote:
Hi Rich
Unless the issue involves some sort of security problem that involves a
potential CVE, or contains sensitive data internal to your organization
that you cannot ma
/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/9.0/html/Administration_Guide/Advanced_Entry_Management.html#groups-cmd-memberof
Thank you
Isabella
On 10/01/2015 11:20 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 10/01/2015 12:06 PM, ghiureai wrote:
Hi Rich
Unless the issue involves some sort of security problem that involves a
potential CVE
all the children.Is there a plugin that can
update this attribute automatically when an new child entry is added
or deleted to the base node?
No.
Thanks,
Adrian
On 09/17/2015 10:44 AM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
On 09/17/2015 10:39 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/17/2015 11:33 AM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Hell
On 09/16/2015 03:11 PM, Adrian Damian wrote:
Hi There,
The scenario is simple: we have a subtree in the DIT with a few thousand
children node. The parent node of the subtree has a few acis including a
couple of macro acis that apply to each of the child nodes. We've
observed a significant
e logconv.pl to look for them.
On 09/17/2015 08:48 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/17/2015 09:41 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Rich, which internal logging you are referring ? I have auditing and access log
on ,are other loggin option ?
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Dire
On 09/17/2015 09:41 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Rich, which internal logging you are referring ? I have auditing and access log
on ,are other loggin option ?
On 09/17/2015 09:50 AM, Striker Leggette wrote:
Greetings,
What is the recommended way to remove a database with the following
example path?:
5G /db/slapd-389/db/testentry
Would it be simply stopping slapd, remove the path and start slapd?
Did you do
, Adrian Damian wrote:
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-34.el6_5.x86_64
On 09/17/2015 09:56 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Adrian Damian wrote:
Hi Rich,
Sorry for missing this info. It's 1.2.11 running on SL6.
We need the exact version, which is why I asked for the output of
rpm -q
389-ds
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Adrian Damian wrote:
Hi Rich,
Sorry for missing this info. It's 1.2.11 running on SL6.
We need the exact version, which is why I asked for the output of rpm -q
389-ds-base
Adrian
On 09/17/2015 08:54 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/16/2015 03:11 PM, Adrian Damian
A is used as
the base? Is this normal or we are doing something wrong? Is there a
solution to this?"
Don't know, but yes, it looks as though the performance is related to
macro ACI handling.
Please file a bug/ticket with 389.
Thanks,
Isabella
On 09/11/2015 08:35 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/
On 09/14/2015 09:10 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Hi ,
we are having issues with one of our DS , part of multimaster
replication , after was onlin for several hours and brought up the DS
is not respoding running a basic ldapsearch to count the users or
grous will hang not results or messages in error
On 09/11/2015 08:50 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Fast query:
ldapsearch -x -h xxx -b "ou=ds,dc=cb,dc=net" -W
-D "uid=axxx,ou=Users,ou=ds,dc=cb,dc=net"
"(objectclass=groupofuniquenames)" "cn" | sort -u | wc
Slow query:
ldapsearch -x -h xxx-b
"ou=groups,ou=ds,dc=cb,dc=net" -W -D
On 09/10/2015 04:00 PM, ghiureai wrote:
Hi Gurus,
we are seening some performance issues when running ldapsearch with
tree ou=Groups, ou=ds , dc=abc, dc=net takes longer than when looking
for same user but from one level up of tree up aka :ou=ds,
dc=abc,dc=net, the difference in time very
On 09/02/2015 09:45 PM, Prashant Bapat wrote:
Hi,
We have been using 389-ds as part of FreeIPA. In one of our
environments, we have 2 389-ds installations with replication.
What version? rpm -q 389-ds-base
Randomly, the 389-ds on either of them completely freezes and there
are high
bKey", "ipaSshSigTimestamp",
"loginshell"])
except LDAPError, e:
print e
print "Error getting info from LDAP. Either wrong username or
issues with LDAP server "
raise sys.exit(-1)
On 3 September 2015 at 19:17, Rich Megginson <rmegg...@re
On 08/28/2015 04:46 AM, Fabien Gasbayet wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 questions.
1 - On this diagram :
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/9.0/html/Administration_Guide/Windows_Sync.html#Windows_Sync-About_Windows_Sync
Password replication seems bi-directional…
But
On 08/05/2015 06:23 AM, Alpesh Shinde wrote:
Hi Team,
How to get the directReport values for a particular manager using RHDS queries?
I am new to RHDS however have mostly worked on Microsoft AD and there is a
powershell cmdlet to get this value. Can someone please help me with this? Or
may
On 07/22/2015 07:10 AM, Paul Tobias wrote:
On 21/07/15 15:21, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/21/2015 06:19 AM, Paul Tobias wrote:
Hi guys,
In short: Can I use Class of Service[1] together with Host Based Attributes[2]?
It doesn't work for me.
The directory server uses Host Based Attributes
On 07/21/2015 06:19 AM, Paul Tobias wrote:
Hi guys,
In short: Can I use Class of Service[1] together with Host Based Attributes[2]?
It doesn't work for me.
The directory server uses Host Based Attributes to give different loginshell on
servers and desktops. The idea is that on a desktop
On 07/16/2015 05:47 PM, Fong, Trevor wrote:
Hi Guys,
We’re running 389-ds 1.2.11.29-1.el6
Can you upgrade to a newer version? There have been several releases
since then.
and are experimenting with the DNA plugin. When trying to set an
existing account’s uidNumber to the magic regen
On 07/11/2015 09:29 PM, Burn Alting wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 08:00 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/03/2015 05:49 AM, Burn Alting wrote:
Has anyone authored code to parse a 389 Directory Server's access.log
file(s) with an aim of generating audit events based around the LDAP
request
On 07/07/2015 10:07 AM, Mark Boyce wrote:
Good Morning,
Has anyone else seen this behavior; after configuring Winsync I add
one or perhaps two “pairs” to the sync agreement (ds:AD)
Firstly - what version of 389-ds-base? rpm -q 389-ds-base
What version of Windows/AD? 2012 R2?
I don't
that add clarity?
*Mark L. Boyce*
Senior Identity Management Analyst
University of California, Office of the President
*From:*389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Rich
Megginson
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 07, 2015 9:22 AM
*To:* 389
-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Rich
Megginson
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:59 AM
*To:* 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
*Subject:* Re: [389-users] winsyncsubtreepair
On 07/07/2015 11:49 AM, Mark Boyce wrote:
Rich,
The version of 389-ds-base is 1.3.3.10-1.fc22
On 07/03/2015 05:49 AM, Burn Alting wrote:
Has anyone authored code to parse a 389 Directory Server's access.log
file(s) with an aim of generating audit events based around the LDAP
request type. Basically, take the log sequence
[21/Apr/2007:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 fd=608 slot=608
On 07/04/2015 02:06 AM, William wrote:
Hi,
I am going to publish this as a blog post in the next few days on
http://firstyear.id.au
However, as it's relevant for this audience I decided to re-post it
here.
My workplace is a reasonably sized consumer of 389ds. We use it for
storing pretty
On 07/06/2015 05:18 PM, William wrote:
I will clean up and publish the usl tool set in the future to help
other people test their own LDAP secuity controls.
Nice! This would be a good addition to our admin/management tools,
if
you would like to submit it. Please open a ticket and attach the
On 06/26/2015 12:30 AM, Joshua Brodie wrote:
Hi:
Is it possible to source IP address restrict ldap transactions to
ports 389 and 636 - outside of using external firewall or IP tables?
Something like this?
On 06/24/2015 06:05 AM, Robert Kuska wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am Robert Kuska, I am a python co-maintainer
and co-owner of change Python3 as default which aims to provide
python3 only packages by default across different fedora platform
releases[0].
The reason why I am contacting you is, that
On 06/22/2015 05:13 PM, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
On Saturday, June 20, 2015 04:40:58 PM Noriko Hosoi wrote:
389 Directory Server 1.3.4.0
The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-ds-base version
1.3.4.0.
Fedora packages are available from the Fedora 22 and Rawhide repositories.
On 06/19/2015 04:29 AM, Ivanov Andrey (M.) wrote:
Hi Noriko,
There are three MMR replicating servers. It's one month of
uptime and the servers wanted to trim the replication log.
Here is what i've
On 06/12/2015 09:44 AM, Derek Belcher wrote:
Where can I go to see the difference between:
389-admin-1.1.36 and 389-admin-1.1.35-1.el6.x86_64
If you checkout the repo from git:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/admin.git
You could do
$ git diff 389-admin-1.1.35..389-admin-1.1.36
On 06/03/2015 03:54 AM, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote:
Hi 389 developers,
I was reading news about Sourceforge is hijacking nmap page in
Sourceforge.
When I listed the page owned by user sf-editor1, it looks like 389
directory server was also hijacked.
Are you aware of this?
I was not
On 05/20/2015 05:28 AM, Mihai Carabas wrote:
Hello,
We've setup an 389 Directory Server on a Fedora21 and configured
synchronization with an Active Directory (running on an Windows2012R2
Datacenter). We've managed to synchronize all the accounts from the
389DS to AD (about 44000). All the
On 05/15/2015 12:36 PM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote:
HI LIst,
we are seeing some strange behavoiurs in our DS ( members of pluging is enabled)
if we add a user to a group we can't see that new user in group for some
minutes /days , the follwing curl returns 0 members in group but ( there were
On 04/17/2015 08:19 AM, Angel Bosch wrote:
I went through this with Mageia. You either need to enable selinux
(permissive) or compile 389-ds
without selinux.
do you mean I won't be able to execute it without selinux?
or is just the installer?
Please file a ticket -
On 04/14/2015 12:41 PM, Gary Algier wrote:
Hello,
I am in search of a tool to solve a new directory server issue in
relation to Active Directory...
For a long time here at work, we have had LDAP as our authentication
source and nsswitch source for Solaris and Linux. First it was the
On 04/07/2015 12:00 AM, William wrote:
I ran the following search:
ldapsearch -H ldap://localhost -b
'cn=nsAccountInactivationTmp,dc=example' -s sub -Z -x -D 'cn=Directory
Manager' -W '(objectClass=*)' '*'
I was trying to locate the object:
On 03/20/2015 11:28 AM, Joshua Brodie wrote:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/8.2/html/Administration_Guide/Managing_Replication-Using_the_Retro_Changelog_Plug_in.html
You should use the latest docs -
On 03/11/2015 11:54 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
Hey every one
I have a question I know at least once in the past i setup the admin
console so it could utilize Kerberos passwords based on a howto I
found once which after I changed jobs I could never find again.
today I was looking for
, then yes, for changes to the core 389-ds-base package.
On Mar 9, 2015, at 8:01 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/09/2015 05:54 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 03/09/2015 04:44 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho
On 03/09/2015 12:39 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote:
I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The
info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working
either , maybe they are not valid anymore.
They are not, and have been removed. It was just too difficult
using the old rmeggins repo or a copr repo, see
http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html
Thanks.
Is compiling from source our only option? Because, I can do that.
I'd just rather not have to.
On Mar 9, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg
On 03/09/2015 05:54 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 03/09/2015 04:44 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com
mailto:nho...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have
March 2015 at 12:38, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/03/2015 08:26 PM, Hadoop Solutions wrote:
[root@sv2lxdpdsedi01 gse]# java -version
java version 1.7.0_75
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (rhel-2.5.4.0.el6_6-x86_64 u75-b13)
OpenJDK 64-Bit
On 03/03/2015 10:59 AM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
What platform you are running on? How did you install the packages?
E.g., yum install 389-ds? And could you provide the package versions?
$ rpm -q idm-console-framework
$ rpm -qa | egrep 389
Also, which java version? java --version.
Looks like
suggestions.
Thanks,
Shaik
On 4 March 2015 at 02:09, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/03/2015 10:59 AM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
What platform you are running on? How did you install the
packages? E.g., yum install 389-ds? And could you provide
/bin/389-console
On 4 March 2015 at 10:49, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/03/2015 07:45 PM, Hadoop Solutions wrote:
Hi,
please find the below 389 versions...
[gse@sv2lxdpdsedi01 ~]$ *rpm -q idm-console-framework*
idm-console
On 03/02/2015 12:08 PM, Jordan, Phillip wrote:
Today the DIRSRV has crashed twice on each of our two servers. We
have been attempting to find the root cause and also in weeks past
installed the CORE Pack RPM’S. In debugging this in stage we were able
to create a manual core file but once we
On 02/26/2015 07:41 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote:
--
Mitja Mihelič
ARNES, Tehnološki park 18, p.p. 7, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia
tel: +386 1 479 8877, fax: +386 1 479 88 78
On 26. 02. 2015 15:18, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/26/2015 06:30 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote:
Hi!
We have a provider/consumer
On 02/26/2015 06:30 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote:
Hi!
We have a provider/consumer (master/slave) setup and we wish to create
a database backup on the master.
Replica setting on the master are set to Single Master.
But when I run
.../db2bak $backup_path/$current_date
Backup fails an the following
On 02/18/2015 09:12 AM, Jordan, Phillip wrote:
So a few weeks back we installed the CORE RPM and we were able to get
a test core file on our Dev environment, but dev is 1.2.11.15-32, and
in prod we are unable to get the core to generate with version
1.2.11.15-48.
That's a good thing,
On 02/18/2015 07:43 AM, Fernando Fuentes wrote:
Team,
Due to a small requirement by ovirt I had to change my nsslapd-minssf
from 0 to 1.
All of my systems continue to work as they use ssl.
But the admin-console is now unable to log in.
Can you configure the admin-console to use ssl?
I
/Administration_Guide/Managing_SSL.html
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
On 02/18/2015 08:45 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/18/2015 07:43 AM, Fernando Fuentes wrote:
Team,
Due to a small requirement by ovirt I had to change my
nsslapd-minssf from 0 to 1.
All of my systems continue to work
-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Rich
Megginson
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 18, 2015 10:25 AM
*To:* 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
*Subject:* Re: [389-users] CORE creation is not working
On 02/18/2015 09:12 AM, Jordan
On 01/28/2015 09:09 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
After struggling to get a certificateExactMatch query to work, I’ve discovered
that in 389ds the certificateExactMatch rule in the schema has been marked as
commented out like this:
# TODO - Add Certificate syntax
#attributeTypes: (
On 01/28/2015 09:43 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 28 Jan 2015, at 6:33 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
Does 389ds offer certificateExactMatch support as per the RFCs?
No, that's why it is commented out. We do not have support for the
certificate* matching rules. That's why we
On 01/19/2015 02:11 PM, xian wrote:
Hi Team,
I have 2 Red Hat Directory Server instances on level 9.0 and would
like to patch both to 9.1. They are operating in a master-master 2 way
replication mode.
How am I supposed to do that? I don't see much info in the official
docs, only how to
=0 tag=107
nentries=0 etime=0 csn=54b3c6e500050001
thanks,
Shardul.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/08/2015 10:21 AM, shardulsk wrote:
Hi,
Running 389-ds 1.1.2 on Centos 5.
rpm -q 389-ds-base
PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/12/2015 07:18 AM, shardulsk wrote:
Rich,
Updating to current version sounds like a no-brainer but there
are circumstances which won't allow be to do that for the next
few weeks atleast
On 01/08/2015 10:21 AM, shardulsk wrote:
Hi,
Running 389-ds 1.1.2 on Centos 5.
rpm -q 389-ds-base
We have suddenly seen repl5_inc_waitfor_async_results errors crop up
in our error log during peak traffic hours.
The Master loses sight of Hubs and replication stalls. Most of the
times
On 12/17/2014 11:51 AM, Crocker, Deborah wrote:
It is possible to get the admin console and admin server from an rpm
on Centos 7? I don't see them in the yum search output.
No, not yet - see https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47865
Thanks
D. Crocker
--
389 users mailing list
1 - 100 of 1385 matches
Mail list logo