Does such NOTIFY go to a TCP registered user? Of course if there is
not an existing TCP connection between Kamailio and the final natted
user then it's not possible to send such NOTIFY.
Do you mean that the user is sending transport=tcp in his Contact header ?
Is it acceptable to
Can you try uac_req_send() from UAC module ?
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.5.x/uac.html#id2467913
-pascal
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:02 PM, ALAEDDINE abbech alasup...@yahoo.frwrote:
Hello all
How can i generate an INVITE from OpenSER. That means that Openser make the
role of UAC.
Hi
How can we set the expires value of the REGISTER OK sent back to the clients
in a dynamic way ?
We set already a value with
modparam(registrar, max_expires, 120)
but if the UA has been detected to be behind a NAT we want to apply a
different value.
Regards,
Pascal
Hi
A quick question, when I apply a fix_nated_register() to a remote user when
he/she registers, how can I know later on if this user is behind NAT ?
All my calls go through a B2BUA:
Caller -- kamailio/rtpproxy -- B2BUA -- kamailio/rtpproxy
-- Callee
When my B2BUA calls a user,
,
Pascal
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Pascal Maugeri pascal.maug...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm not that familiar with flag management.
so when I detect a UA is behind NAT, I do:
if (nat_uac_test(19)) {
if (method==REGISTER) {
setbflag(7
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 07/08/2009 09:17 AM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion Jiri. So far I have been monitoring sr and I
know that the TCP async implementation might resolve some problems we're
facing
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Jiri Kuthan j...@iptel.org wrote:
Pascal Maugeri wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion Jiri. So far I have been monitoring sr and I
know that the TCP async implementation might resolve some problems we're
facing with kamailio.
But I'm a bit conservative and I
for SIP),
I suggest you consider the sip-router core. There has been (and I think
still will be) tremendous effort put in it.
-jiri
Pascal Maugeri wrote:
Hi
I recently read the following in order to optimize OpenSER in handling
TCP connections:
First, the TCP supervisor process must
Hi
I recently read the following in order to optimize OpenSER in handling
TCP connections:
First, the TCP supervisor process must be given an elevated priority
level in order to prevent anomalous behavior due to the Linux
scheduler.
First of all, as this is quite old paper (it refers to OpenSER
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Daniel-Constantin
Mierlamico...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On 07/07/2009 02:51 PM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:
Hi
I recently read the following in order to optimize OpenSER in handling
TCP connections:
First, the TCP supervisor process must be given an elevated
?
Cheers
Pascal
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Pascal,
you are right, a stupid bug introduced with the support for the multipart.
I committed to the git repo.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 06/23/2009 11:55 AM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:
Daniel
I've just setup a similar configuration as yours.
Could you check the SDP payload of the SIP INVITE that goes from kamailio to
the callee ? It should contains the IP address of rtpproxy and the port
allocated by the proxy.
Regards,
Pascal
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:41 PM, rubenrojas - Trc.es
mismatching\n);
goto error;
}
? ( ==1 -- ==-1)
Because now it gives me errors when processing INVITE with application/sdp
payload.
-pascal
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/23/2009 10:16 AM, Pascal Maugeri wrote
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Juha Heinanen j...@tutpro.com wrote:
Pascal Maugeri writes:
I tried to install mediaproxy but it looks tricky to install (many
dependencies, including kernel specific configurations) :-(
i don't know about those. i just use mediaproxy debian package
11:30 AM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:
I tried to install mediaproxy but it looks tricky to install (many
dependencies, including kernel specific configurations) :-(
and I would like to stick to rtpproxy for performance reason.
Do you believe the same workaround using textops/filter_body can be used
Yes, you're right. Sorry for that.
-pascal
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 06/22/2009 01:46 PM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:
If I understood correctly you want me to test the patch nhelpr_func.c
you've done in sr in kamailio ?
This is what
to test it directly there.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 06/22/2009 11:30 AM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:
I tried to install mediaproxy but it looks tricky to install (many
dependencies, including kernel specific configurations) :-(
and I would like to stick to rtpproxy for performance reason.
Do you believe
Hi
Does NATHelper support properly multipart SDP (eg. INVITE with
application/sdp and application/resource-lists+xml) ?
Regards,
Pascal
___
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users@lists.kamailio.org
from the message
is it familiar to you ?
-pascal
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Alex Balashov
abalas...@evaristesys.com
wrote:
As I understand it, yes, only the SDP payload per se is modified.
Pascal Maugeri wrote:
Thanks Alex but I'm not sure if I understood correctly
Hi
there are two separate issues here related to multipart/mixed.
one is nathelper/mediaproxy module related and the other relates to
textops/filter_body function.
mediaproxy module's use_mediaproxy() function can extract application/sdp
bodypart both in k 1.5 and sr.
ok, this point is
Hi Geoffrey
Why don't you try:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.5.x/textops.html#id2467793
Regards,
Pascal
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Geoffrey Mina geoffreym...@gmail.comwrote:
I have a need to perform some manipulation of the user part of the
RURI. I have some dialers which
it looks the email I sent yesterday has been blocked because of its size by
the mailing-list agent.
-pascal
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Pascal Maugeri pascal.maug...@gmail.comwrote:
OK good news, with the lastest of 1.5 branch I could not reproduced the bug
I reported.
I've sent
am I missing?
Thank you
Best Regards
vinod
*From:* pascal.maug...@gmail.com [mailto:pascal.maug...@gmail.com] *On
Behalf Of *Pascal Maugeri
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 09, 2009 4:01 AM
*To:* vinod
*Cc:* users@lists.kamailio.org
*Subject:* Re: [Kamailio-Users] /etc/init.d/kamailio start
Indeed, yes I have the xcap_client module loaded.
I believe you found the gulty module : as I have another server without the
xcap_client loaded and it does not give this db error !
-pascal
Hi Pascal, do you have loaded xcap_client module?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
i...@aliax.net
at 1:57 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.comwrote:
I did a fix for what Inaki reported for xcap_client, you can get latest svn
version for 1.5 and try again, maybe that was the issue.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 06/08/2009 04:54 PM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:
Daniel, do you want me to do other
ok I try it again
-pascal
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.comwrote:
I mistakenly returned error code even all was ok, in the previous commit.
Should be fixed on svn.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 06/09/2009 06:22 PM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:
I just tried your fix
at least it starts :-)
let's see if I get these db errors ...
-pascal
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Pascal Maugeri pascal.maug...@gmail.comwrote:
ok I try it again
-pascal
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.com wrote:
I mistakenly returned error
at 5:32 PM, Pascal Maugeri pascal.maug...@gmail.comwrote:
at least it starts :-)
let's see if I get these db errors ...
-pascal
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Pascal Maugeri
pascal.maug...@gmail.comwrote:
ok I try it again
-pascal
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Daniel-Constantin
Daniel, do you want me to do other test ?
-pascal
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Pascal Maugeri pascal.maug...@gmail.comwrote:
OK now I can provide you more feedback regarding this issue and using your
patch:
Jun 5 18:21:17 sandbox /usr/sbin/kamailio[15152
On which operating are you running kamailio ?
On fedora for instance, I usually copy the script from kamailio source
root/packaging/fedora/kamailio.init to /etc/init.d/kamailio. Then I edit
the file /etc/init.d/kamailio and change the variable oser to point to the
directory where the kamailio
Hi
We installed Kamailio 1.5.1 on a Amazon EC2 Fedora Core 9 image.
As you may know EC2 maps a public IP address to a private IP address of the
image, hence there is a kind of NAT. It looks presence does not work because
of this. We'll try to make use of the NATHelper module ASAP.
Except this
Sorry I misunderstood what you want me to do: please just forget my previous
email.
Now I'm going to generate some load to reproduce the failure and I'll send
you the feedback you expect.
-pascal
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Pascal Maugeri pascal.maug...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
I just applied
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Pascal Maugeri pascal.maug...@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry I misunderstood what you want me to do: please just forget my
previous email.
Now I'm going to generate some load to reproduce the failure and I'll send
you the feedback you expect.
-pascal
On Fri, Jun
Hello
I'm getting these errors using Kamailio 1.5.1:
Jun 4 12:25:10 sandbox /usr/sbin/kamailio[5060]:
ERROR:db_mysql:db_mysql_submit_query: driver error on query: Commands out of
sync; you can't run this command now
Jun 4 12:25:10 sandbox /usr/sbin/kamailio[5060]: ERROR:core:db_do_update:
ok, I've applied your patch changed my kamailio.cfg to have debug=5 and
restarted the test.
I will send you send feedback ASAP
-pascal
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
On 06/04/2009 11:49 AM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:
Hello
I'm
which configuration parameters do you want to see ?
-pascal
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Saúl Ibarra sag...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you paste you DB settings?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Pascal Maugeri
pascal.maug...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I'm getting these errors using Kamailio
Hi
Does Kamailio support SIP Compact Form (RFC 3261, section 7.3.3) ?
Regards,
Pascal
___
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users@lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net wrote:
2009/5/28 Pascal Maugeri pascal.maug...@gmail.com:
FYI, I've changed the configuration to:
tcp_children=8
tcp_send_timeout=3
tcp_connect_timeout=5
and it looks we get less often the problem described here
To my best knowledge, TCP support in Kamailio is blocking. This has
been addressed for sip-router (tcp_async=yes). Anyway, there are still
some issues for tls.
This is a good argument to switch to sip-router :-)
How many simultaneous TCP connections are you handling? You could try
to
-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On 05/19/2009 06:26 PM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:
Hi
I'm doing an integration of the RLS module for Kamailio 1.5 and a
third-party XCAP server.
I see that when my client sends a SIP SUBSCRIBE to a list that is defined
into the document rls-services
Hi
I'm doing an integration of the RLS module for Kamailio 1.5 and a
third-party XCAP server.
I see that when my client sends a SIP SUBSCRIBE to a list that is defined
into the document rls-services, I only see the traffic from Kamailio/RLS to
the XCAP server to retrieve a resource-lists
Hi
I am planning to use the RLS module with an external XCAP server
(integrated_xcap_server=0) to store users resource-lists documents.
My question is related to the changes of a such resource-lists document and
how the RLS server behaves. I've read carrefully the module
if this is the proper way to proceed by at least it works for
me :-)
Any suggestion are welcome!
Pascal
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net wrote:
El Jueves, 22 de Enero de 2009, Pascal Maugeri escribió:
Well not really : if we use long publish expiration such as 3600s, we may
Hi
Using kamailio v1.5 (trunk), I'm testing the following simple presence
scenario where one user shutdowns his application without prior un-PUBLISH
and un-REGISTER.
1) user A subscribes to user B presence. Both use X-Lite.
2) user B shutdowns his X-Lite (without doing un-REGISTER and un-PUBLISH
:
El Jueves, 22 de Enero de 2009, Pascal Maugeri escribió:
Hi
Using kamailio v1.5 (trunk), I'm testing the following simple presence
scenario where one user shutdowns his application without prior
un-PUBLISH
and un-REGISTER.
1) user A subscribes to user B presence. Both use X-Lite.
2
I think so.
I've filled in a new issue in the tracker system (#2291718).
Regards,
Pascal
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Klaus Darilion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
looks like a bug in the presence module
Pascal Maugeri wrote:
Hi
We've seen the following problem:
1) the UA subscribe
Hi
We get very ofter this error message when subscribing to presence:
Nov 14 16:20:01 server2-operations /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[6224]:
ERROR:presence:get_stored_info: record not found in hash_table
Nov 14 16:20:01 server2-operations /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[6224]:
Hi
We've seen the following problem:
1) the UA subscribe to a presentity with a SUBSCRIBE that contains this
Contact header:
p1i sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1414;transport=tcp
2) then the presence module outputs in log file:
INFO:presence:send_notify_request: NOTIFY
sip:[EMAIL
CRITICAL:core:yyerror: parse error in config file, line 432, column 1-2:
invalid local_route statement
As you announced this feature for OpenSER 1.4 release series, I assume this
is available for kamailio v1.4.2 ?
Best regards,
Pascal
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pascal Maugeri
Right, I already tried append_hf but it looks that the NOTIFY messages sent
by presence module do not go through the main route block.
Can you confirm that ?
Regards,
Pascal
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
append_hf() from textops.
Pascal Maugeri
Hi
How do you configure dispatcher to send OPTIONS ping to load-balanced
proxies ?
I'm using kamailio 1.4.2 with this of configuration:
[...]
modparam(dispatcher, ds_ping_method, OPTIONS)
modparam(dispatcher, ds_ping_interval, 5)
modparam(dispatcher, ds_ping_from,
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL
of time. That is
how this is typically done. At some point you've got to say that you've
done all you can do, and it's up to the other side.
Thanks Alex, it's a good point.
-pascal
Pascal Maugeri wrote:
Hi
I was wondering how to achieve an architecture with two or more active
load
Thanks for your input !
The link you provided is very useful for that purpose.
-pascal
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Henning Westerholt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 21 October 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
I would like to have some rough estimate of the registrar performance
53 matches
Mail list logo
