On Friday 10 April 2009, Juha Heinanen wrote:
I have been looking at the carrier route and LCR. it appears to me that
LCR can be used to handle tariff , i.e,
selecting lowest cost route. while carrier route doesn't have this
capability at all. but carrier route , according to LCR,
-Users] carrier route vs LCR
On Friday 10 April 2009, Juha Heinanen wrote:
I have been looking at the carrier route and LCR. it appears to me that
LCR can be used to handle tariff , i.e,
selecting lowest cost route. while carrier route doesn't have this
capability at all. but carrier route
.
- Original Message - From: Ovidiu Sas o...@voipembedded.com
To: Jinsong Hu jinsong...@hotmail.com
Cc: gomespere...@startel.pt; users@lists.kamailio.org
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] carrier route vs LCR
Both lcr and carrierroute can hadle
: gomespere...@startel.pt; users@lists.kamailio.org
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] carrier route vs LCR
Both lcr and carrierroute can hadle routing based on price. It's just
a matter of properly defining the routed.
lcr is easier to approach
To: Jinsong Hu jinsong...@hotmail.com
Cc: gomespere...@startel.pt; users@lists.kamailio.org
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] carrier route vs LCR
Both lcr and carrierroute can hadle routing based on price. It's just
a matter of properly defining the routed.
lcr
I have been looking at the carrier route and LCR. it appears to me that LCR
can be used to handle tariff , i.e,
selecting lowest cost route. while carrier route doesn't have this
capability at all. but carrier route , according to LCR, scales better than
LCR.
for a typical telco, the rate
