Hi,
Following the example in the documentation for managing ACLs (
http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel3.8:manage_acl), how should be
implemented if we have two groups of users which should be able to
execute VMs, but one set of users (say, administrators), which should be
able to create
We've been using 802.1Q under CentOS 6 without problems for quite a long
time.
Can you post a detailed description of what is happening?
Thanks
On 30/11/12 07:57, users-requ...@lists.opennebula.org wrote:
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:56:47 +0800
From: ??? yu...@neusoft.com
To: users
1. First, I create a vm on computer14, i saw network interfaces below:
[oneadmin@computer14 ~]$ ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr E8:39:35:18:A1:60
inet addr:10.72.24.216 Bcast:10.72.24.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::ea39:35ff:fe18:a160/64
Hi,
The complete reference for the ACL permissions required by each command is
here [1].
You should also take into account the individual permission of each
resource [2]. I'm referring specifically to:
Groups A and B should only be able to execute resources on their own group.
This can be
Opennebula recreates all necessary interfaces on demand.
It means that, once a virtual network uses .1Q, it will create the
bridge to route the traffig and map the VLAN on the physical interface.
Dependenig on your distribution, you may need to specify the path of the
bridge control binary
I see no way to update this..
RANGE
IP_START : 10.228.92.50
IP_END : 10.228.92.60
Are you expected to delete your vlan and start over?
--
Tim Ehlers
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
Hi all,
Sorry if this has been asked already, I did look but didn't see anything.
The situation is thus; in a hurry I needed to get a couple of virtual
machines going, we didn't have anything installed at the time beyond
plain QEMU/KVM, so I just used that, creating the following shell script
