On Tuesday 14 December 2010 20:33:05 Rangababu Chakravarthula wrote:
Environment: KVM, ONE 1.4
How does the value for RVM get populated? Even though there were no VM's
running on the host the RVM shows some value. Few times it even shows
negative value. What might be the problem? How can we
On 2010. November 27. 18:01:24 Steven Timm wrote:
I have never used opennebula with a dhcp server but I think you would
have either have to use the contextualization scripts to pass in
a modified ifcfg-eth0 that calls for DHCP address, or save a special
original image that has them already.
On 2010. November 11. 15:25:33 Tino Vazquez wrote:
We are working on an extension of the hooks mechanism, so when a host
gets into the ERROR state a script can be triggered with information
about the (allegedly) running VMs in that host, so it can resume them
elsewhere.
How do you plan to
On 2010. October 29. 15:17:58 Javier Diaz wrote:
Have you tried to comment this line Defaults requiretty in the
sudoers?. If you share the ONE dir via NFS, it is only needed in the
front-end.
The problem is that ONE tries to execute something with sudo, but that command
is not allowed to be
On 2010. October 20. 23:24:27 Fred wrote:
- After a Live Migration, Can I re-run a command? Hum, maybe I could use
some cron job to test a VPN state and if it is down try to connect. Is this
a good solution?
Libvirt hooks can do that if you're using a hypervisor that's supported by
OpenNebula
:12 PM, Andreas Ntaflos d...@pseudoterminal.org
wrote:
On Friday 03 September 2010 15:13:55 Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
On Friday 03 September 2010 14.54.06 Ignacio M. Llorente wrote:
You could consider to contribute the new driver to our ecosystem
and/or write a post in our blog describing
the weekend to gather all its dependencies, wrap it up and write some
docs about it. Expect a release in the beginning of next week.
Thank you for your interest.
Cheers,
--
cc
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Andreas Ntaflos d...@pseudoterminal.org
wrote:
On Friday 03 September 2010 00:28:23 Székelyi
On Thursday 02 September 2010 14:03:32 Michael Brown wrote:
I've found that NFS is unacceptably slow too. With both the front end and
the nodes mounting NFS, copies have to go through the front end, then back
out again, which is a bit wasteful.
We use a NetApp storage system, which can do
