cannot access google drive from your location,
contact me.
cheers
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
that the answer was given! And he was actually using
the extra point with zero weight trick. I told him to ask here about the
eigenvalues discrepancy, because I did not know what could be the cause.
cheers
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users
Sci. & Tech.
> On 5/10/2018 12:42,Lorenzo Paulatto<paul...@gmail.com> <paul...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> the cost of computing the phonon dos with matdyn is zero, compared to the
> cost of the phonon calculation itself.
>
> --
> Lorenzo Paulatto
> Wr
Hello,
the cost of computing the phonon dos with matdyn is zero, compared to the
cost of the phonon calculation itself.
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
Written on a virtual keyboard with real fingers
On 10 May 2018 06:31, "Yi Wang" <wangw...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear everyone,
As I under
This is strange, bu without more information about your calculation (input,
output, execution command and the core file in question), my guess is that
it is just a human error.
Kind regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
Written on a virtual keyboard with real fingers
On Wed, 23 May 2018, 09:56 Juliana
tion="total" and set the
tot_magnetization vector. This method is powerful, a bit complicated,
but quite well documented.
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
info/users
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
plit
the definition of the +U species until they do, this way you can define
different initial ns for them.
hth, it is a lot of cooking
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
energy. Of course, you can
always specify more bands than necessary and add more zeros in each
line, actually, extra numbers at the end of the line are ignored.
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https
e details of the calculation, but if you
did not change it, in your case, it should be 1. Hence
OCCUPATIONS
1.
1.
or
OCCUPATIONS
2.
0.
Would both work.
hth
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://list
ers
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
be that the scf does not converge.
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
Written on a virtual keyboard with real fingers
On 29 Jul 2018 22:35, "Martina Lessio" wrote:
Dear all,
I am running some simulations of defects in MoTe2 slabs with the goal of
plotting the integrated local density of states.
I
On 30/07/18 10:20, Hande Toffoli wrote:
!vdw_corr ='grimme-d3'
Just to be sure, please note that lines starting with a "!" in the input
are considered comments and ignored.
kind regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users ma
__
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
, d'ont
forget to cite it.
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
Written on a virtual keyboard with real fingers
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, 21:41 Sudip Kumar Mondal,
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am currently running an optimization of a Uranium bearing phase. The
> pseudo in use for it is a scalar relativistic gg
t starting magnetization, you must define them as different
species.
kind regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Possibly, here I'm on holiday and I can't really check, bu I think that it
is, safer to see this kind of derivative in cartesian coordinates than
think what it means to rotate on the basis of the displacements, there
could be a d u/d x factor
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
Written on a virtual keyboard
d do
END IF
I.e. instead of averaging the cell force over all three directions, you
only average over the first two. This of course will break the usual
cell_dofree="volume", you can do it properly by adding another
cell_dofree and another switch, but I think it is worth doing a quick
te
Hello Antoine,
Your procedure does not look obviously wrong to me, but you did not say
what X is.
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
Written on a virtual keyboard with real fingers
On Sat, 14 Jul 2018, 10:43 JAY Antoine, wrote:
> Dear all,
> I would like to (re)obtain the phonons frequencies that I
You don't set nspin=2
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
Written on a virtual keyboard with real fingers
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, 13:16 Asad Mahmood, wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out the error. But can you tell me how do I perform
> an scf calculation including both, the spin polarization and spin
The problem is that noncolin=.true. and nspin=2 are not compatible. Kind
regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
Written on a virtual keyboard with real fingers
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, 23:11 Asad Mahmood, wrote:
> Please reply anyone who may know the solution to this issue. It is very
> urgent an
Delete all the pseudos on top
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
Written on a virtual keyboard with real fingers
On 10 Sep 2018 03:06, "Daniel Ortiz Gutierrez" wrote:
Thank Dr. Pietro, i ran the clean_ps script and the make
run-tests-pw-parallel, but the problem persist, the pseudopotentials
d
sts.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
input for wfck2r.x.
Thanks in advance
Zahra
IPM, Tehran, Iran
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
,
Stefan Seidl
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum
from bad geometry (i.e. ions core regions overlapping), bad
pseudopotentials (should not happen with anything from usual libraries)
or problematic input parameters with advanced features (i.e. lda+U, exx,...)
kind regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
to use a smearing?). You
can put the Fermi energy it in the middle of the gap, or on the highest
occupied orbital, as long as your choice is consistent it does not
really matter.
kind regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users mailing list
users
estart'; see the bug tracker for details
(http://qe-forge.org/tracker/?atid=133_id=10=browse).
If this is your case, the simpler solution is to remove restart_mode from
the band calculation input
bests
--
Lorenzo Paulatto IdR @ IMPMC/CNRS & Universit? Paris 6
phone: +33 (0)1 44275 084 / sk
o calculate its Density of State and band
> structures from the scratch?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rosegarden
--
Lorenzo Paulatto IdR @ IMPMC/CNRS & Universit? Paris 6
phone: +33 (0)1 44275 084 / skype: paulatz
www: http://www-int.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
mail: 23-24/4?16 Bo?te courrie
ind that, whatever xcrysden draws, it does not influence
the chemical properties of the material.
bests
--
Lorenzo Paulatto IdR @ IMPMC/CNRS & Universit? Paris 6
phone: +33 (0)1 44275 084 / skype: paulatz
www: http://www-int.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
mail: 23-24/4?16 Bo?te courrier 115, 4 place
omatically generated points are
perfectly fine (and way less cumbersome to check).
bests
--
Lorenzo Paulatto IdR @ IMPMC/CNRS & Universit? Paris 6
phone: +33 (0)1 44275 084 / skype: paulatz
www: http://www-int.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
mail: 23-24/4?16 Bo?te courrier 115, 4 place Jussieu 75252 Paris C?dex 05
chosen
by Debbichi are not forming a typical BZ path either; I guess everybody is
free to put his k-points wherever he wishes :-)
--
Lorenzo Paulatto IdR @ IMPMC/UPMC CNRS & Universit? Paris 6
phone: +33 (0)1 44275 084 / skype: paulatz
www: http://www.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
mail: 23-24/
agnetic susceptibility calculation
>
> I'm getting frustrated...
>
> What is strange is that pw.x compiled with gfortran 4.6.1 is apparently
> doing very well. This is not the case of gipaw
>
> Carlo
>
--
Lorenzo Paulatto IdR @ IMPMC/CNRS & Universit
or inf. However, I do
not know the gipaw code, maybe Davide can guess something from that.
cheers
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:54:30 +0200, Carlo Nervi
wrote:
> Il 25/10/2011 18.22, Lorenzo Paulatto ha scritto:
>> You could try to compile using this option (all together, without
w" (2 changes for file, 4 total)
* recompile
* run
cheers
--
Lorenzo Paulatto IdR @ IMPMC/UPMC CNRS & Universit? Paris 6
phone: +33 (0)1 44275 084 / skype: paulatz
www: http://www.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
mail: 23-24/4?14 Bo?te courrier 115, 4 place Jussieu 75252 Paris C?dex 05
st regards
P.S. there is a message size limit for messages sent to the mailing list
but it is high enough that you do not need to use SMS abbreviation.
--
Lorenzo Paulatto IdR @ IMPMC/UPMC CNRS & Universit? Paris 6
phone: +33 (0)1 44275 084 / skype: paulatz
www: http://www.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
mail
n some cases
but slightly less in others.
My opinion is that just doing a geometry optimization with QE using the
default setting is probably pretty much the same as doing a VASP+GADGET
optimization, although I cannot be 100% sure.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto IdR @ IMPMC/UPMC CNRS
t with a tex teditor you'll find this line:
US Ultrasoft pseudopotential
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto IdR @ IMPMC/UPMC CNRS & Universit? Paris 6
phone: +33 (0)1 44275 084 / skype: paulatz
www: http://www.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
mail: 23-24/4?14 Bo?te courrier 115, 4 place Jussieu 7
calculation the symmetry-dependent patterns are stored
in the variable "u" from module "modes".
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto IdR @ IMPMC/CNRS & Universit? Paris 6
phone: +33 (0)1 44275 084 / skype: paulatz
www: http://www-int.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
mail: 23
alue of l. In your specific case I would use
2 2s and 2 2p but only one 1s (it has the same l as 2s).
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brai
the range
-0.20 to 1.0
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brains ***
http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/
ers
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brains ***
http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/
SISSA Webmai
h(i,j) <
> epsp )
i.e. adding iforceh(*,*) where necessary. Could you please test this patch?
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brains ***
http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/
namics for the cell, hence
there is no problem with cell_dofree.
regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brains ***
http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/
In data 03 settembre 2009 alle ore 10:31:09, dev sharma
ha scritto:
> i
> have to give nbnd in scf /nscf file ???
> Thanks in advance,
I you have already computed the scf calculation you can just do an nscf
one with increased number of bands.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paula
information
on your "symmetry problem"; personally I doubt it is caused by
insufficient diagonalization accuracy.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save
100% CPU, how much memory they are taking and so on.
regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
SISSA Webmail https:
n I solve this problem ?
Probably the network connection is slow, use k-point parallelisation
(pools) among different nodes, it is not as efficient as g-space
parallelization, but it requires much less communication.
regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone:
index.php/Troubleshooting_(PWscf)#.27warning_:_N_eigenvectors_not_converged_27>
(or < http://tr.im/y5mw>)
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save ita
bsections!)
Don't be afraid to ask if you have some problem.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
SISSA Webmail https://web
'. I have
> set the same "nbnd" and "K_POINTS" for both.
Dear Y.P.Wang,
could you please specify better what you mean by "diagonalization step"?
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: ht
ns?
Dear Shaptrishi,
just set nspin=2 in the namelist, you will also have to use
smearing in order to improve convergence. Have a look at the manual for
details.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa
hi,
if you have 21 electrons in total you cannot put 21 up and 21 down; this
would make 42 total. A sensible choice is 11 up and 10 down.
best regards
P.S. please provide your affiliation when writing to this mailing list
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39
to the size of the Brillouin
zone, hence inversely proportional to the size of the cell.
E.g. if you estimate that 6x6x6 k-points converge a certain calculation
than 3x3x3 k-points will be converge a 2x2x2 supercell to exactly the same
level.
Best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA &
're running it) my answer is the same as the last time.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brains ***
http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/
y for LSDA.
Obsolescent:
use multiplicity or tot_magnetization instead.
it says quite clearly that nelec=nelup+neldw, again nelec is the total
number of electrons.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: htt
quivalently:
OCCUPATIONS
21.33 1.33 1.34
I hope it helps, best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
SISSA
he amount
of vacuum)
4. if you are using a computation cluster, run the code on more processors
5. if you are using a PC, buy more RAM
6. us cg instead of david diagonalization, but only as a last measure
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
s
ngauss, independently from what you've used for the scf
calculation.
Incidentally, I hope you have not uses the tetrahedra method for structure
optimization: it is explicitly deprecated in the input manual.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787
ied.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
SISSA Webmail https://webmail.sissa.it/
Powered by SquirrelMail http://www.squirrelmail.org/
ou can use it directly, without any conversion or converting it with
uspp2upf.x from the upftools directory. On the other hand, the pseuso is
normconserving I know of no tool that could do the conversion.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787
pin-up and 2 for spin-down. If you have manually set
nbnd to any other number (I would use at least 4), you'll have to specify
that many occupations (of course the higher ones will be zero).
Best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paul
rself. The GIPAW may do something like this
internally, but I don't know the details.
But are you sure you do want it? The 4d electron in Titanium, in the DFT
framework, has an energy higher than 5s 5p 6s and 6p; actually it is not
even a bound state!
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SIS
bution.
regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brains ***
http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/
In data 14 settembre 2009 alle ore 17:38:29, dev sharma
ha scritto:
> and is this understanding right ???
yes, it is
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brains ***
pare time, but not by a large
amount.
+
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brai
ver converge, unless forces are
zero by symmetry.
regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brains ***
http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/
.00
> 3P 1 0.00
> 3D 2 0.00
Not at all.
But keep in mind that a calculation for a charged system is a bit
difficult to converge, especially with respect to the cell size.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
ww
if you compile that specific file with lower optimization
(you can do it by hand, copying the compilation line displayed by make but
replacing -O2 or -O3 with -O0) it will probably work.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
ww
t know if it's the only option.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brains ***
http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/
ant I can give you the experimental version for you to try, or you
can use damped dynamics instead of bfgs.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save ita
melist:
london = .true.
london_s6 = 0.75! this is the default
london_rcut = 200.00 ! this is the default
the meaning of s6 and rcut should be accordingly to V. Barone et al. J.
Comp. Chem., 30, 934 (2009).
I don't know if it is implemented in cp.x too.
best regards
--
L
ation errors.
I know it's not a great advice, but I would try a different version of the
compiler, just to be sure.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.si
the convergence threshold if necessary
5. you can always try the damp algorithm instead of bfgs...
I hope it helps,
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italia
es a huge
> performance degradation.
If this is the case, reducing the number of pools will reduce the amount
of memory required per node.
cheers
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** sav
t parts,
and set the discussion title to whatever it was before; this make it
easier for other people to follow the discussion!
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save ita
In data 23 settembre 2009 alle ore 15:40:55, ali kazempour
ha scritto:
> But esspresso don't allow fixed occupation for spin-polarized
Dear Ali,
it does! You have to specify the occupations for spin up then, on a new
line, for spin down.
that's all
cheers
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SI
can probably decrease ecutwfc a bit
(like 25-30%), but your definitely should increase ecutrho consistently
(about 8-12 times ecutwfc).
best regards.
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*
s, it is good idea.
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brains ***
http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/
f before you had an even number of electrons than
it will become odd, i.e. if before you had an insulator than you will have
a conductor. Keep in mind that you're not just replacing *one* atom,
you're replacing one atom *per unit cell*.
best regards
P.S. I'm confused... are you Neel Sing?
--
the case they will crash after a while.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brains ***
http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/
the effect it's meant to prevent!
Finally, you cannot use the restart feature if you change the cutoff,
you'll have to do a manual restart by copying the last atomic position.
cheers
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http:
Once you have logged in you can Set Digest Mode to Off to have the
messages delivered as soon as they are posted.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://
hp/Troubleshooting_(PWscf)#pw.x_stops_with_.27inconsistent_DFT.27_error>
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brains ***
http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/
fc keeping ecutrho fixed.
Maybe you can fix ecutrho to 240 and see how low you can go with ecutwfc
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save ita
he #include outside the function (i.e.
just under the other include) on my copy QE and it *still* works, could
you please try to see if it solves the problem in ubuntu 9.04?
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://pe
have this limitation.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brains ***
http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/
tabs are bad
only at the beginning of the line...
There are still a few quirks with the coordinates parser, I am planning to
fix them soon, but have no time at the moment.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
sk
upted job on the same nodes it
does not really make much difference.
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
SISSA
on't you tell us your problem, instead
of your guess for a solution?
best regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/
*** save italian brains ***
http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/
ely must
use *nosym=.true.*, and break the symmetry somehow, e.g. by specifying
occupations from input, or tot_magnetization or multiplicity; or taking a
slightly non-cubic unit cell.
Best regards.
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
s
e having explored any other
possibility.
Change the input as following and it may work:
5
2S 1 0 2.00 0.00 1.60 1.60
2P 2 1 6.00 0.00 1.60 1.60
3S 2 0 2.00 0.00 2.40 2.40
3P 3 1 1.00 0.00 2.60 2.60
3D 5 2 -2.00 0.25 2.30 2.30
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39
nd nr2, which is weird as it is, by default, much smaller in your
case. Anyway, if you set nr3 equal to nr1 it will use all the symmetry
operations.
For the symmetry experts: could you please check if the code behaviour is
correct?
cheers
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trie
incompatibility issue?
I just told you, in my previous email. Yet I don't think it's a good idea,
and the forces won't be zero anyway. Your lattice have lower symmetry than
the FCC lattice (it is actually a supercell), hence you can only have zero
forces up to the numerical accuracy.
best regard
ntinuously show
> discontinuities, specifically at a radius of 15bohrs.
Dear Peter,
the wavefunctions are generated on a logarithmic radial grid, around 15
bohr the points are very coarse, btw how are you examining the
wavfunctions? (there is not file_wfcncgen='..' in your input).
best regards
--
On Sat, October 10, 2009 20:58, dev sharma wrote:
> /home/dev/espresso-4.0.2/upftools/fhi2upf.x <39-Y.LDA.fhi> 39-Y.LDA.UPF
Dear Dev,
fhi2upf does not work like that. The correct syntax is:
/whatever/fhi2upf.x 39-Y.LDA.fhi
which would create 39-Y.LDA.fhi.UPF
regards
--
Lorenzo
On Sun, October 11, 2009 19:50, Reza Ebraahimi wrote:
> a_0" or "a_0*b" ?
Dear Reza,
it is a_0, celldm(1) that is always used as internal unit of measure
regards
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www: http://peo
ine name in Italian (it is feminine in English,
German, Spanish and others), on the other hand "Layla" is feminine in
every language I'm aware of. You can avoid this kind of mistakes by
calling people directly with their names, instead of using Sir/Madam.
cheers
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
In data 14 ottobre 2009 alle ore 19:02:33, dev sharma
ha scritto:
> second do nscf (with nbnd option )
This step is not necessary, unless you want to include more bands in the
projection.
cheers
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype:
> atoms the vc-relax converged and the latter turns up error in the same
> parameter .
It happens with peculiar configurations, the easiest way to get rid of it
is normally to increase the number of bands.
cheers
--
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone:
1 - 100 of 1492 matches
Mail list logo