whomever did it, Thank You :-) for pushing out the new clamav 0.97.5 for us
there was an issue in our main.cld, or part of a file format change or
something
said it was corrupt or whatever
...and bombed the final parts of the yum update
so that was easily fixed by running freshclam a time or
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 09:54 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Is the build environment well defined anywhere so I can do that?
You can have a look for dar or pydar in the git repos, I vaguely
remember that I converted it to git at some point.
Dag's system basically consists of static chroots
Dne 25.6.2012 6:52, R - elists napsal(a):
whomever did it, Thank You :-) for pushing out the new clamav 0.97.5 for us
there was an issue in our main.cld, or part of a file format change or
something
said it was corrupt or whatever
...and bombed the final parts of the yum update
so that
Dne 25.6.2012 1:10, Christopher Meng napsal(a):
Can you describe the infrastructure 's meaning especially in repoforge?
Thanks.
Chris,
Sorry, I don't understand the question.
DH
___
users mailing list
users@lists.repoforge.org
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 11:05 +0200, David Hrbáč wrote:
I want to state this, just to make sure, we are REALLY aware of this
issue. We are not trying to go take-it-or-don't-use-it way. As to
resources, there's no lack of hw/sw resources. We are really short on
man-hours.
Right, sorry if I was
Dne 24.6.2012 15:54, Nico Kadel-Garcia napsal(a):
Even without push approva for the active repository, I wonder if some
continuous build/regresstion test environments hosted offsite would be
useful. I find it *really useful* to be able to build components I
work with using mock and run basic
I think the actual issue is that package clamav-db contains
both cld and cvd files. ClamAV doc says you should only have
one of the two. What's more, the cld files are empty. So it
seems that something went wrong in the build process.
Prior to the update my installation had main.cvd
yeah, I agree. and thank you again.
--
Best Regards,
Christopher Meng--'Cicku'
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and Contributor of GNU.
Blog:http://cicku.me
Twitter:@cickumqt
Hope you can visit and leave some comments.
More Contact info see here:http://about.me/cicku
Dne 24.6.2012 02:35, John R. Dennison napsal(a):
The problem is that the builds are not run and pushed to the mirrors in
a timely fashion. This is not a new issue, just a, sadly, recurring
one.
I'm not trying to speak ill of the repo or the contributors / Dag, but
there is a problem with
Dne 24.6.2012 03:45, Nico Kadel-Garcia napsal(a):
A better question, perhaps, is how can we best help ?
Nico's right. We know the issue and even the solution. We need to come
up with a new build infra and workflow to build, test, sign and push. We
can create something like two or more sign-offs
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 09:45:49PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
A better question, perhaps, is how can we best help ?
Not from my vantage point. It's been pretty clear that Dag will not
relinquish sole rights to kick off builds and push to
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:37 AM, David Hrbáč david-li...@hrbac.cz wrote:
Dne 24.6.2012 03:45, Nico Kadel-Garcia napsal(a):
A better question, perhaps, is how can we best help ?
Nico's right. We know the issue and even the solution. We need to come
up with a new build infra and workflow to
Can you describe the infrastructure 's meaning especially in repoforge?
Thanks.
--
Best Regards,
Christopher Meng--'Cicku'
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and Contributor of GNU.
Blog:http://cicku.me
Twitter:@cickumqt
Hope you can visit and leave some comments.
More Contact info
hello folks and builder
you have an idea that should take the time to update rpmforge of deposit
for the new version of clamav rpm package
https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commit/c9ea3f89205911cba0adf
even when this is over 2 days
sincerely
--
ok
On Sunday, June 24, 2012, ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
hello folks and builder
you have an idea that should take the time to update rpmforge of deposit
for the new version of clamav rpm package
https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commit/c9ea3f89205911cba0adf
even when this is over 2
I agree.
On Sunday, June 24, 2012, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:07:30AM +0200, ml wrote:
you have an idea that should take the time to update rpmforge of deposit
for the new version of clamav rpm package
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 8:35 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:07:30AM +0200, ml wrote:
you have an idea that should take the time to update rpmforge of deposit
for the new version of clamav rpm package
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 09:45:49PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
A better question, perhaps, is how can we best help ?
Not from my vantage point. It's been pretty clear that Dag will not
relinquish sole rights to kick off builds and push to the mirrors; at
least that has been his stance for
yes.And that's why somebody hate this repo.
On Sunday, June 24, 2012, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 09:45:49PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
A better question, perhaps, is how can we best help ?
Not from my vantage point. It's been pretty clear that Dag
19 matches
Mail list logo
