Re: [strongSwan] Charon hangs after failing to delete Rekeyed IPsec SAs

2012-03-20 Thread anand rao
Hi Tobias,   Thanks for the reply and suggestion.   I have changed the tunnel config as below conn %default     ikelifetime=20m     keylife=10m     rekeymargin=3m But still the problem persists. I can still see lot of redundant SAs when issued ipsec statusall. On my environment there is no

Re: [strongSwan] Charon hangs after failing to delete Rekeyed IPsec SAs

2012-03-20 Thread Tobias Brunner
Hi Anand, On my environment there is no support for kernel-netlink interface for IPsec, I have to use kernel-pfkey interface only as I have my hooks registered in PFKEY to XFRM for IPsec. I have tried latest versions of strongswan (4.5.1 and 4.5.3) both resulted in kernel panic after

[strongSwan] To Generate Traffic on Load-Tester Tunnels to Cisco Router.

2012-03-20 Thread Mohan Krishna
Hi, I am trying to establish multiple IPsec Tunnels between Linux(strongSwan) and Cisco Router using Load tester plugin, and I want to generate traffic on each negotiated load-tester tunnel. Tools like 'iperf' need configuration on both sides and are of no help since I cant configure it on Cisco

Re: [strongSwan] Charon hangs after failing to delete Rekeyed IPsec SAs

2012-03-20 Thread anand rao
Hi Tobias,   I have already enabled both kernel-pfkey and kernel-netlink plugins. Both the plugins are loaded.  This was suggested by Andreas for my earlier query about pfkey plugin usage for IKEv1. Since 4.5.3 is causing kernel-panic in my environment for unknown reasons, i want to resolve

Re: [strongSwan] Header verification failed and NAT mapping changed

2012-03-20 Thread Kim Zeitler
Hi Tobias, I forgot about this yesterday, but this was actually a bug in 4.5.0. While charon detects that it is behind a NAT, and properly responds to requests, it does not update the port internally and still uses port 500 for its own requests and for installing the SA in the kernel.

Re: [strongSwan] charon: [15]CFG trap not found, unable to acquire reqid 0

2012-03-20 Thread Vilhelm Jutvik
Dear Tobias, thank you very much. I thought that charon was signalled by the IPsec stack's SPD when a new SA was to be negotiated, not that it itself set the policy. Your solution didn't work right away though. I found that ipsec start only started the starter process and nothing more. It was

Re: [strongSwan] charon: [15]CFG trap not found, unable to acquire reqid 0

2012-03-20 Thread gowrishankar
Hi Tobias, On Wednesday 21 March 2012 12:44 AM, Vilhelm Jutvik wrote: Dear Tobias, thank you very much. I thought that charon was signalled by the IPsec stack's SPD when a new SA was to be negotiated, not that it itself set the policy. Your solution didn't work right away though. I found