@lists.strongswan.org
Emne: Re: [strongSwan] Strongswan on android gingerbread
Federico.Mancini@... writes:
YES! It was the algorithms! I finally got a tunnel!
I have no idea which specific algorithm it was that was missing, I just
enabled a bunch of them, but most
likely AES, which I guess
: Mancini, Federico
Kopi: users@...
Emne: Re: [strongSwan] Strongswan on android gingerbread
Hi Federico,
What else could it be? (just as a note I have note enabled anything
extra with the cryptographic API modules. )
It could very well be a problem with the algorithms. Which algorithms
Hi Federico,
What else could it be? (just as a note I have note enabled anything
extra with the cryptographic API modules. )
It could very well be a problem with the algorithms. Which algorithms
are negotiated between the two hosts? Did you configure anything
special on the responder?
@lists.strongswan.org
Emne: Re: [strongSwan] Strongswan on android gingerbread
Hi Federico,
What else could it be? (just as a note I have note enabled anything
extra with the cryptographic API modules. )
It could very well be a problem with the algorithms. Which algorithms
are negotiated between
: Re: [strongSwan] Strongswan on android gingerbread
Hi again,
Thanks a lot for the previous answers and sorry to having to bother you again
with a question probably not even related to StrongSwan.
I suddenly found out that the emulator I use, that is probably created after
the build of the modified
Hi Federico,
I still get some .orig files after patching although no .rej file is
produced and no error messages are given when I patch.
Perhaps patch is aliased to 'patch -b' on your system (check with
'alias' in a console window).
Problem is that it looks like when I try to use the VPN,
Hi Federico,
I still get some .orig files after patching although no .rej file is
produced and no error messages are given when I patch.
Perhaps patch is aliased to 'patch -b' on your system (check with
'alias' in a console window).
Doesn't seem like there is any alias either, but once I
What does not seem to be there instead is the charon service itself.
When I went in the adb shell and tried to start it, I got an error,
and noticed that in /system/bin/ of the running emulator, there is no
charon command at all.which would explain a lot. What can be the
cause? Is it
@lists.strongswan.org
Emne: Re: [strongSwan] Strongswan on android gingerbread
What does not seem to be there instead is the charon service itself.
When I went in the adb shell and tried to start it, I got an error,
and noticed that in /system/bin/ of the running emulator, there is no
charon command
Sendt: 21. oktober 2011 14:10
Til: users@lists.strongswan.org
Emne: Re: [strongSwan] Strongswan on android gingerbread
I've done all of that, but clearly something must have gone wrong. I'll see if
I can find out what exactly.
Thanks for the help,
Federico
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Tobias
Now I don't understand why I should build a tarball just to extract
it again
Yes, that's strange, isn't it ;-) The reason for this is that building
the tarball also creates several generated files, which cannot be done
that easily directly inside the Android build system. These files are
-bounces+federico.mancini=ffi...@lists.strongswan.org
[mailto:users-bounces+federico.mancini=ffi...@lists.strongswan.org] På vegne av
federico.manc...@ffi.no
Sendt: 21. oktober 2011 16:33
Til: users@lists.strongswan.org
Emne: Re: [strongSwan] Strongswan on android gingerbread
Thanks, that explains
But what about just copying the android.mk file from the source tree
inside the folder I get from extracting the
strongswan-4.2.9-stable-4853.tar.bz2 file instead? Would that work?
No, not really. There were quite a lot changes needed to make
strongSwan run on Android. Now, strongSwan 4.2.9
. oktober 2011 16:54
Til: Mancini, Federico
Kopi: users@lists.strongswan.org
Emne: Re: [strongSwan] Strongswan on android gingerbread
But what about just copying the android.mk file from the source tree
inside the folder I get from extracting the
strongswan-4.2.9-stable-4853.tar.bz2 file instead? Would
Brunner [mailto:tob...@strongswan.org]
Sendt: 10. oktober 2011 09:59
Til: Mancini, Federico
Kopi: users@lists.strongswan.org
Emne: Re: [strongSwan] Strongswan on android gingerbread
Hi Federico,
We are planning to use IPsec on a IPv6 network. Does the StrongSwan
IKEv2 port for android fully
[mailto:richard.pick...@csrtechnologies.com]
Sendt: 7. oktober 2011 21:32
Til: Mancini, Federico
Emne: Re: [strongSwan] Strongswan on android gingerbread
Federico,
I've had problems generating certs that android will take, sometimes it
takes them, sometimes from the same ca and settings it won't
started working with these protocols and I am still in
the learning phase.
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Tobias Brunner [mailto:tob...@strongswan.org]
Sendt: 6. oktober 2011 15:19
Til: Mancini, Federico
Kopi: users@lists.strongswan.org
Emne: Re: [strongSwan] Strongswan on android gingerbread
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Tobias Brunner [mailto:tob...@strongswan.org]
Sendt: 6. oktober 2011 15:19
Til: Mancini, Federico
Kopi: users@lists.strongswan.org
Emne: Re: [strongSwan] Strongswan on android gingerbread
Hi Federico,
The problem comes when I try to patch the VPN frontend as written here
Hi all,
I am new to both strongswan, android and IPsec, but for the last three
weeks I have been trying to learn enough
to integrate strongswan into android.
Now, since the kernel.org site to get android sources is down, it took
me two weeks only to get a source that successfully compiled,
Hi Federico,
The problem comes when I try to patch the VPN frontend as written here:
http://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/AndroidFrontend.
Did the patches apply cleanly? Look for .rej files.
The android source doesn’t compile anymore. I suspect it is because I am
using
20 matches
Mail list logo