Anyone? :-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Lewis, Eric [mailto:eric.le...@ipi.ch]
Gesendet: Montag, 17. Mai 2010 11:07
An: Maven Users List
Betreff: How to create a report based on annotations
Hi
I'd like to create a Maven report based on annotations (OVal annotations, to be
I'm releasing a Maven2 multi-module project. One of the
modules is a POM
project (assembly project) that uses the
maven-assembly-plugin in order
to
build an assembly (zip archive). The artifacts to be
assembled are
specified
via dependencies in the POM. They point to modules
contained in
On 18 May 2010 08:40, Markus Muenkel markus.muen...@fernuni-hagen.dewrote:
I'm releasing a Maven2 multi-module project. One of the modules is a POM
project (assembly project) that uses the maven-assembly-plugin in
order
to
build an assembly (zip archive). The artifacts to be assembled are
Hi,
I use Hudson together with Maven to copy the generated sites to a server via
FTP (with 'mvn site-deploy'). The entry for distribution management looks like
distributionManagement
site
idftp-project/id
nameProject Website/name
urlftp://ftp.somewhere.xy/url
/site
No idea about the apt-maven-plugin, but for site customization, are you
familiar with skins:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin/examples/creatingskins.html
?
HTH,
-Lukas
Lewis, Eric wrote:
Anyone? :-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Lewis, Eric
Yes, I know skins, but that's not what I meant. I meant how to create a rich
report within a Maven plugin, using its standard images (if they exist) and
formatting. Something like the output of
http://mojo.codehaus.org/versions-maven-plugin/dependency-updates-report-mojo.html
Best regards,
On 5/18/2010 3:17 AM, Lewis, Eric wrote:
Anyone? :-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Lewis, Eric [mailto:eric.le...@ipi.ch]
Gesendet: Montag, 17. Mai 2010 11:07
An: Maven Users List
Betreff: How to create a report based on annotations
Hi
I'd like to create a Maven report
Am Tue, 18 May 2010 09:10:05 +0100 hat
Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
geschrieben:
On 18 May 2010 08:40, Markus Muenkel
markus.muen...@fernuni-hagen.dewrote:
I'm releasing a Maven2 multi-module project. One of the
modules is a POM
project (assembly project) that uses
Am Tue, 18 May 2010 09:10:05 +0100 hat
Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
geschrieben:
On 18 May 2010 08:40, Markus Muenkel
markus.muen...@fernuni-hagen.dewrote:
I'm releasing a Maven2 multi-module project. One of the
modules is a POM
project (assembly project) that uses
Thanks, but it's not what I'm looking for. This describes how to customize your
Maven site. But I want to know how to write a sophisticated report plugin.
Best regards,
Eric
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Marshall Schor [mailto:m...@schor.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Mai 2010 12:32
Hi,
I have project A which produces artifact as war. Project A has dependency on
project B and it is mentioned in the pom of Project A. Now the build of
Project A is acting indifferently in 2 environments
a) When I am building from my local/development envionment, it builds the
war with only
Hi,
If you decide to include the transient dependencies, a plugin called
deptools can help you detect when wrong dependency-versions are chosen.
You can have a look at it here:
http://github.com/mbknor/deptools
http://github.com/mbknor/deptoolsRegards,
Morten
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:42 PM,
Are you sure you have the same maven version on both environments? And
are you specifying all plugin versions?
It is a best practice to specify the versions of all plugins you use.
Different maven versions take different plugin versions. Use the
enforcer plugin to enforce that you specify all
Hi all,
I'd like to use CXF's built-in clients, but rather than downloading all of the
dependencies I'd like to pull only those jars that are relevant and needed for
the clients. I ran mvn dependency:tree -Dincludes=org.apache.cxf (output is
below). By examing the output of the dependency
On 18 May 2010 11:56, Markus Muenkel markus.muen...@fernuni-hagen.dewrote:
Am Tue, 18 May 2010 09:10:05 +0100 hat
Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com geschrieben:
On 18 May 2010 08:40, Markus Muenkel markus.muen...@fernuni-hagen.de
wrote:
I'm releasing a Maven2
It is the same maven version. mvn -v gives 2.2.0 in both environments. It is
the same pom and same proxy and remote repositories also. Still the build
war in one environment has transitive dependency jars in it. Any ideas?
Thanks
Sunil
--
View this message in context:
I just want to point out that there is not need to first call mvn compile
and then mvn package. mvn package is sufficient as it includes all phases up
to, and including, package.
/Anders
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 14:42, AVSUNIL sunil...@infosys.com wrote:
Hi,
I have project A which produces
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:44 AM, AVSUNIL sunil...@infosys.com wrote:
It is the same maven version. mvn -v gives 2.2.0 in both environments. It is
the same pom and same proxy and remote repositories also. Still the build
war in one environment has transitive dependency jars in it. Any ideas?
I changed the
earSourceDirectory./earSourceDirectory
to
earSourceDirectory${basedir}/earSourceDirectory
No difference in my build though.
Thanks.
C.
Wale12 wrote:
I go into the maven repository to
\org\apache\maven\plugins\maven-ear-plugin and delete the 2.4.1. folder
then run the
You can use exclusions to cut out transitive dependencies.
In the following example, we want our lms-facades package but we do not
want the faces and logging dragged in with it.
dependency
groupIdcom.artifact_software.lms/groupId
artifactIdlms-facades/artifactId
version1.8.1/version
Not a maven issue but something that we ran into.
CXF makes a combined jar that you can use.
If you do not use this beware of incorporating CXF jars into a single
jar (jar-with-dependencies) since the individual CXF jars have duplicate
property files that only contain the properties required
Hi Ron,
I want to do something similar.. but I want to tell maven to exclude all
dependencies instead of listing 9 to 11 inside it. Is there a way?
dependency
groupIdgroup_of_needed_dependecny/groupId
artifactIdneeded_dependecny/artifactId
version1.8.1/version
exclusions
exclusion
The use of an explicit version is the problem. Instead of
0.0.3-SNAPSHOT try depending on ${project.version}. In my experience
using the fixed version the assembly plugin (and others like the
dependency copy goals) will use what's in the local repo not what's in
the reactor.
-Original
CXF makes a combined jar that you can use.
Do you know where I can find this combined client jar? I've searched everywhere
with no luck.
If you do not use this beware of incorporating CXF jars into a single
jar (jar-with-dependencies) since the individual CXF jars have duplicate
property
On Tuesday 18 May 2010 11:04:07 am Dan King wrote:
CXF makes a combined jar that you can use.
Do you know where I can find this combined client jar? I've searched
everywhere with no luck.
If you do not use this beware of incorporating CXF jars into a single
jar (jar-with-dependencies)
On 18/05/2010 11:04 AM, Dan King wrote:
CXF makes a combined jar that you can use.
Do you know where I can find this combined client jar? I've searched everywhere
with no luck.
Here is our maven dependency. It has a lot of exclusions since we have
other poms that deal with Spring,
On 18/05/2010 11:08 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Tuesday 18 May 2010 11:04:07 am Dan King wrote:
CXF makes a combined jar that you can use.
Do you know where I can find this combined client jar? I've searched
everywhere with no luck.
If you do not use this beware of
I have a project which depends on artifacts which transitively depend on
different Spring versions. I need to manually exclude all spring*-2.0.8
artifacts from being included in the project, since they don't play nicely
with the 2.5 artifacts. How do I do this? The documentation has led me to
Hi,
I've just submitted this issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4680
However, I'm told this wasn't the right place to submit. I'm not sure.
To me, one of the key features of Apache Maven (if not the main feature)
is its repository mechanism. This makes the redistribution of software
We have the same situation.
Include the Spring that you need directly in a dependency in the POM and
use exclusions on all versions of Spring in the dependencies that are
transitively bringing in 2.0.x that you do not want.
Ron
On 18/05/2010 12:54 PM, C. Benson Manica wrote:
I have a
I thought it was well-established that you should include the license
inside binary and source artifacts. What exactly is your reason for
thinking this isn't a good idea? Saying that it isn't obvious doesn't
really count IMHO as this is highly subjective.
Justin
On 5/18/10 1:09 PM, Bruno
On 18/05/2010 1:09 PM, Bruno Harbulot wrote:
Hi,
I've just submitted this issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4680
However, I'm told this wasn't the right place to submit. I'm not sure.
To me, one of the key features of Apache Maven (if not the main
feature) is its repository
I'm investigating using Maven site-deploy to update parts of our site on
Apache. Currently, we don't use maven site-deploy for this; instead we
put the generated content (html, etc.) into svn, and then go to
people.apache.org and checkout or svn update into a directory there
/www/x.y.z/etc
On 18/05/2010 18:25, Justin Edelson wrote:
I thought it was well-established that you should include the license
inside binary and source artifacts.
What exactly is your reason for
thinking this isn't a good idea? Saying that it isn't obvious doesn't
really count IMHO as this is highly
On 18/05/2010 18:33, Ron Wheeler wrote:
1) If people are distributing their own software in violation of their
own licensing, it is their problem.
2) If people are distributing other people's software in violation of
the licencing, they should stop.
Hard to see how this is a Maven problem or
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-optional-and-excludes-dependencies.html
Look under Dependency Exclusions.
/Anders
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 19:21, Ron Wheeler
rwhee...@artifact-software.comwrote:
We have the same situation.
Include the Spring that you need directly
Take a look at the maven pom for an example:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote:
I'm investigating using Maven site-deploy to update parts of our site on
Apache. Currently, we don't use maven site-deploy for this;
On 5/18/10 2:50 PM, Bruno Harbulot wrote:
On 18/05/2010 18:25, Justin Edelson wrote:
I thought it was well-established that you should include the license
inside binary and source artifacts.
What exactly is your reason for
thinking this isn't a good idea? Saying that it isn't obvious
On 18/05/2010 2:52 PM, Bruno Harbulot wrote:
On 18/05/2010 18:33, Ron Wheeler wrote:
1) If people are distributing their own software in violation of their
own licensing, it is their problem.
2) If people are distributing other people's software in violation of
the licencing, they should
Our resource folder in webapps named res(which has images, js, css, etc) is
renamed every release. This then makes it so
when we fix a css, customers get the fresh one instead of the old stale one
from their cache(ie. they get the fix we made since
this folder is always renamed).
So, in maven, I
On 18/05/2010 20:45, Ron Wheeler wrote:
On 18/05/2010 2:52 PM, Bruno Harbulot wrote:
But how is a repository to know
1) Who is allowed to upload?
2) What, if any, license scheme the person uses. I can make up my own
license and I don't think that copyright or any law depends on a copy of
the
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Bruno Harbulot
bruno.harbu...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
On 18/05/2010 20:33, Justin Edelson wrote:
Clarification of the documentation and/or mechanisms on how to
redistribute the licences properly with the software is what I'm
suggesting. In terms of core
The MAVENUPLOAD issue you refer to was processed by hand. This is
something we've worked to stop and automate, so it's not really
relevant what happened it was 2 years ago.
That said, I don't know if LICENSE.txt inside the new bundle format
would be handled any differently because LICENSE.txt is
On 19/05/2010 00:41, Brian Fox wrote:
The MAVENUPLOAD issue you refer to was processed by hand. This is
something we've worked to stop and automate, so it's not really
relevant what happened it was 2 years ago.
That said, I don't know if LICENSE.txt inside the new bundle format
would be
Thanks for the suggestions! I found yet a ... fourth? ... method to do
this: I used the exec-maven-plugin which runs the 'main' method in a class.
I wrote a quick app that loaded the object models to be documented
(everything here is reused, of course, so nothing new). Once loaded, I then
Does that follow more or less the new guidelines? Are you saying that I
should have jsslutils-1.0-licence.txt next to the other jars in the bundle
instead (sorry, I can't see licence files in the screenshots on that blog
entry).
No, I'm saying if you wanted the license sitting in the folder
46 matches
Mail list logo
