Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Continuous Delivery with Maven now possible?

Hi to all, I think it is needed to explain that in more detail (means also to improve the ci documentation). Let me start with the following: You can only use those three names "revision", "changelist" and "sha1" in a version tag of the pom file cause they are handled special (the

Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Continuous Delivery with Maven now possible?

Hi Dan, On 08/05/17 18:48, Dan Tran wrote: Hi Karl I think you already made changes to the the plugin, but will file ticket to make it official https://github.com/mojohaus/flatten-maven-plugin/issues/41 Already done by your ticket.. Kind regards Karl Heinz -D On Thu, May 4, 2017 at

Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Continuous Delivery with Maven now possible?

Hi Karl I think you already made changes to the the plugin, but will file ticket to make it official -D On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On 05/05/17 02:30, Dan Tran wrote: > >> is flatten-maven-plugin threadsafe? if not, we have a

Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Continuous Delivery with Maven now possible?

Hi Dan, On 05/05/17 02:30, Dan Tran wrote: is flatten-maven-plugin threadsafe? if not, we have a problem with large project where multhreaded build is a must have maven 3.5 displays a warning on flatten-maven-plugin not thread safe I need to take a look...can you file in a ticket on

Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Continuous Delivery with Maven now possible?

On Mon 8 May 2017 at 03:58, Eric Benzacar wrote: > Hi, > > Interesting. Would something like this be functional then? It seems to > work, but I don't know if it is working as expected, or by fluke: > > com.soebes.examples.j2ee parent > ${revision} pom .. > >