Re: Undocumented Feature: Usage of negation for profile activation

2009-05-11 Thread TM
Wendy Smoak-3 wrote: It could go on http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-profiles.html . Can you open a JIRA issue if there isn't one, and possibly suggest a patch? Done, cf. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGSITE-86 -- Thorsten -- View this message in

Undocumented Feature: Usage of negation for profile activation

2009-05-08 Thread TM
Hello, I just found a---to my best knowledge---undocumented feature and though I should share it with the community in the hope that it will made its way into the Maven documentation. The feature is that you can use the negation symbol ! within a profile activation specifification not only to

Re: [Vote] findbugs-maven-plugin v 2.0 release

2009-03-26 Thread TM
-1 Background: According to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MFINDBUGS-66, the plugin integrates Findbugs version 1.3.6. Meanwhile, version 1.3.8 was released. I suggest to catch up with that release before releasing the plugin. -- Thorsten Garvin LeClaire-2 wrote: The Maven Findbugs

Activation of multiple profiles at the same time

2009-03-18 Thread TM
Hello, I'm facing some behavior regarding activation of multiple profiles within a pom.xml, which is contrary to what I was expecting. Maybe someone can help. I have a pom consisting of three profiles: profiles profile!-- Set tools.jar for most SUN JDKs. -- iddefault/id

Re: Doesn't suppress box around APT text

2009-02-10 Thread TM
I can confirm your observation, i.e., it doesn't work for me either (using Maven 2.0.9 and site plugin 2.0-beta-7). But I havn't checked if there is already an issue about that in JIRA. -- Thorsten Czollli wrote: Hello, according to the APT format a text like this: Some text

How to refer to SNAPSHOT timestamp from Web site

2009-01-29 Thread TM
Hello, I'm creating a project Web site using the Maven site plugin. The project is currently in a SNAPSHOT state, that is, the assembly that I create (and artifacts) have a timestamp suffix attached to their file name when the get deployed to some Maven repository. Assuming that the build

Assembly plugin 2.2-beta-2 shows odd behavior regarding dependencies inclusion

2009-01-22 Thread TM
Hello, we face a rather advanced requirement regarding creation of various assemblies in a multimodule project. What we are trying to achieve is as follows. Assume there is a root project P consisting of multiple module projects M1, ..., Mn (hierarchy depth max. 1). From the root POM we create

Re: Assembly plugin 2.2-beta-2 shows odd behavior regarding dependencies inclusion

2009-01-22 Thread TM
Sorry, the subject of this posting is false. I used Nabble to post that message and for some strange reason it used a subject from an earlier posting. I re-posted this message with the correct subject. -- Thorsten TM wrote: Hello, we face a rather advanced requirement regarding

Re: [ANN] Maven Assembly Plugin 2.2-beta-3 Released

2009-01-07 Thread TM
This was eagerly awaited. Thanks for the good work! However, I've found one minor difference that caused a change in my assembly descriptors when upgrading from 2.2-beta-1 to 2.2-beta-3. So far, it was possible to exclude an entire directory from a fileset just by listening its name, as in the

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC10

2008-08-25 Thread TM
Multi-module project fails with NPE on assembly:assembly (assembly plugin used 2.2-beta-1; command used was mvn clean install assembly:assembly eclipse:eclipse). Same configuration works with Maven 2.0.9. Below you will find relevant excerpt from the build trace. Best regards, Thorsten [INFO]

Assembly plugin 2.2-beta-2 shows odd behavior regarding dependencies inclusion

2008-04-16 Thread TM
Hello, today I tried to upgrade the Maven assembly plugin from 2.2-beta-1 to 2.2-beta-2. However, I noticed that for my project which consists of multiple modules the resulting binary assembly now contains dependency JAR files multiple times. The assembly descriptor contains the following

Re: Two question regarding the Eclipse plugin

2008-02-01 Thread TM
nicolas de loof-3 wrote: For 1), you should use exclusions to block transitive dependencies. For 2), any code generation plugin that runs before generate-resource phase will get executed by mvn eclipse:eclipse and the generated source folder added to the .classpath. If you don't get

Two question regarding the Eclipse plugin

2008-01-31 Thread TM
Hello, I'm facing two issues regarding the Maven Eclipse plugin for which I havn't found a soulution yet. 1.) Consider the simple scenario: project A depends on project B, B depends on JAR xyz. If I run mvn eclipse:eclipse for A it will add xyz to the classpath; so far so good. What if I want

Re: Eclipse plugin and project references

2008-01-20 Thread TM
Yes, when mvn eclipse:eclipse is run for a multi module project, the dependencies between the modules will be project dependencies. I see. After I started it from the root project it did work as wanted. Thanks. Still remains the (minor) question to me why does the plugin behaves different

Eclipse plugin and project references

2008-01-15 Thread TM
Hello, my question is about whether it is possible to let the Maven Eclipse plugin create the .classpath file in a way that it will directly reference dependency projects instead of referencing the JAR artifact from the local repository. The following example .classpath file for a project named