Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-M1-RC17

2008-09-11 Thread Martin Höller
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 John Casey wrote: http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/current-maven-RC/ Enjoy, and let me know if you have problems. No problems here with RC17. thanks, - martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-M1-RC17

2008-09-11 Thread Peter Horlock
RC17 runs smooth and nicely here too... Thanks, Peter

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-M1-RC17

2008-09-11 Thread Stephen Connolly
Seems fine here too On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RC17 runs smooth and nicely here too... Thanks, Peter

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-M1-RC17

2008-09-11 Thread Stephen Connolly
BTW, I think we're still getting the project.getOriginalModel().getBuild().getPluginManagement() containing the super-pom (but as that is 2.0.9 behaviour it's not a regression form 2.0.9... perhaps from previous versions but not from 2.0.9) On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Stephen Connolly

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-M1-RC17

2008-09-11 Thread John Casey
Yeah, originalModel looks like it's saved off after inheritance occurs, so the only thing I was able to do this go around was to keep it from getting polluted by plugin information that's discovered by the plugin manager during build execution...so, if you don't have a plugin version

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-M1-RC17

2008-09-11 Thread Michael McCallum
I've been testing RC17 as the external version for m2eclipse and its much much better than 2.0.9 or any of the other RC's. Its actually snappy. had some really weird things with plugin resolutions and stack overflows gioing on intermittently but they all look to be resolved. good work. --

RE: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-M1-RC17

2008-09-10 Thread Chris Schmidt
Developers List; Maven Users List Subject: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-M1-RC17 Hi, I've fixed MNG-3748, where illegal elements in the settings.xml were not triggering build failure. Anyway, this release candidate includes a fix for that issue: http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/current-maven

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-M1-RC17

2008-09-10 Thread Brett Porter
- From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:33 PM To: Maven Developers List; Maven Users List Subject: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-M1-RC17 Hi, I've fixed MNG-3748, where illegal elements in the settings.xml were not triggering build failure. Anyway

Maven concurrent builds Was: RE: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-M1-RC17

2008-09-10 Thread Chris Schmidt
] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 7:50 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-M1-RC17 This has been brought up on the development list. We've adjusted the release plans for 2.1 to reduce the timelines for that and subsequent releases (this release is based on the former

[PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-M1-RC17

2008-09-09 Thread John Casey
Hi, I've fixed MNG-3748, where illegal elements in the settings.xml were not triggering build failure. Anyway, this release candidate includes a fix for that issue: http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/current-maven-RC/ Enjoy, and let me know if you have problems. Thanks, -john ---