>> > Should I better specify the exact dependencies and investigate some
>> > more work in POM maintainance? What would this gain me?
>>
>> You answered your own question, congrats! :)
>
> Well, if I got you right, you mean it won't gain me anything. Right?
I made no such statement. I was simply a
Hi!
Thanks for your answers so far.
Am Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:17:22 -0600 schrieb Wayne Fay :
> > Should I better specify the exact dependencies and investigate some
> > more work in POM maintainance? What would this gain me?
>
> You answered your own question, congrats! :)
Well, if I got you righ
> Should I better specify the exact dependencies and investigate some more
> work in POM maintainance? What would this gain me?
You answered your own question, congrats! :)
Wayne
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven
ntroduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html#Importing_Dependencies
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Hoeller [mailto:mar...@xss.co.at]
> Sent: 7. helmikuuta 2014 11:33
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Best practices for Java EE 7 dependencies
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm wonderi
-
From: Martin Hoeller [mailto:mar...@xss.co.at]
Sent: 7. helmikuuta 2014 11:33
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Best practices for Java EE 7 dependencies
Hi!
I'm wondering what the best practices are for specifying Java EE 7
dependencies in my modules.
There is the so called BOM (bill of mate
Hi!
I'm wondering what the best practices are for specifying Java EE 7
dependencies in my modules.
There is the so called BOM (bill of materials) POM: javax:javaee-api:7.0
which lists all API submodules required for JEE7. Specifying this in my
module as
javax
javaee-api
New versions of the Java EE 6-related archetypes (WAR, EJB-JAR, EAR) were released. The major change from the previous versions is a different handling of the endorsed
classpath override - the new POM strategy is simpler and should be more portable, and ensures that the endorsed API JAR is
things with the standard goal (i.e. mvn package in
that ear project will actually package the ear file)
S.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Thai Dang Vu wrote:
> Is there any java ee 5 directory structure with maven2 support available on
> the Internet? I'm looking to something l
Is there any java ee 5 directory structure with maven2 support available on the
Internet? I'm looking to something like this:
project-name
|-- ear
||-- pom.xml
|-- ejb
||-- src
||-- pom.xml
|-- war
||-- src
||-- pom.xml
|-- pom.xml
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 12:30 +0330, Mohammad Shamsi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> i have an Java EE application. an EJB module that most deploy on application
> server and several client that most use this module.
>
> is there any way to build and client api from this module without s
Hi All,
i have an Java EE application. an EJB module that most deploy on application
server and several client that most use this module.
is there any way to build and client api from this module without separating
app to two defferent module ?
i did this by adding the following code in my
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the help. :-) I did find a link off of that one to an archetype
on java.net, but they had said that the archetype is still in progress.
However, I did find a couple of blogs that have instructions on how to get
going with a Java EE 5 project
http://www.jaceklaskowski.pl/w
AM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Java EE 5 Archetypes?
Hello all,
Does anyone know where I might be able to find a Maven 2 archetype for
Java
EE 5 to get my project off to a start? It would be very handy to have
an
archetype that provides structure for both the servlet container and EJB
Hello all,
Does anyone know where I might be able to find a Maven 2 archetype for Java
EE 5 to get my project off to a start? It would be very handy to have an
archetype that provides structure for both the servlet container and EJB
container.
Thanks,
Jim
and a Java EE 5
javaee.jar jar (without any code, only APIs and non usable
implementation of methods) is going to be publish on java.net in the
next 3 days.
Bill: should I extend this process to the J2EE 1.4 j2ee.jar as well?
Thanks
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mykel Alvis
> Sent: 08 December 2006 19:12
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Javapolis Short Presentation: Introduction to
> Java EE Maven 2.0
>
> Will notes, etc, beco
dition+Maven+2.0+-+Part+1+-+by+Peter+Pilgrim
"Come on down!"
See also here http://www.javapolis.com/confluence/display/JP06/Quickies
--
Peter Pilgrim
UBS Investment Bank,
PTS Portal / IT FIRC OPS LDN,
100 Liverpool Street, London EC2M 2RH, United Kingdom
+44 (0) 20 75 75692
:: Java
ce/display/JP06/Quickies
--
Peter Pilgrim
UBS Investment Bank,
PTS Portal / IT FIRC OPS LDN,
100 Liverpool Street, London EC2M 2RH, United Kingdom
+44 (0) 20 75 75692
:: Java EE / E-Commerce / Enterprise Integration / Development ::
Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com
This message contains co
6/Quickies
--
Peter Pilgrim
UBS Investment Bank,
PTS Portal / IT FIRC OPS LDN,
100 Liverpool Street, London EC2M 2RH, United Kingdom
+44 (0) 20 75 75692
:: Java EE / E-Commerce / Enterprise Integration / Development ::
Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com
This message contains confidential i
Outstanding - thanks for following up with them on that.
-Original Message-
From: Markus KARG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 4:13 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Java EE 5 available on central repository soon!
Dear Maven Community,
Today I asked the
Dear Maven Community,
Today I asked the Glassfish community (= Java EE 5 Reference
Implementation) to publish a j2ee.jar (= Java EE 5 APIs) on the Maven 2
central repository to allow coders to easily use the Java EE technology
with Maven, without the need to download the complete SDK manually.
A
Markus Wolf wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html
Convention is to use the java package for java APIs as groupId.
So for example, the java connector API (jca) has groupId
"javax.resources". You can ask SUN an
Hi,
with J2EE now named Java EE, shall also the guideline for the library be
changed?
From
Product artifact Group ID Artifact ID
J2EE javax.j2ee j2ee
To
Product artifact Group ID Artifact ID
Java EE javax.javaee javaee
Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html
>
> Convention is to use the java package for java APIs as groupId.
> So for example, the java connector API (jca) has groupId
> "javax.resources". You can ask SUN and the JCA JSR m
te ejb-jar.xml ?
-Message d'origine-
De : Markus Wolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 12 juillet 2006 09:38
À : Maven Users List
Objet : Re: Java EE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again,
But I'm missing some more API's from JavaEE (like @R
arkus Wolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 12 juillet 2006 09:38
À : Maven Users List
Objet : Re: Java EE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again,
> But I'm missing some more API's from JavaEE (like @Remote or @Stateless,
> ...). Is there anything available? I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I've found the API's for JSR-220 on sun site and wonder why there are no
> current sugestions in maven2 for this. You can grab the final JSR-220
> here http://java.sun.com/products/ejb/docs.html.
> Are there any maven2 repositories having this API or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again,
> But I'm missing some more API's from JavaEE (like @Remote or @Stateless,
> ...). Is there anything available? I know Sun releases a javaee.jar
> package with SAS and Glashfish containing all JavaEE APIs in one, but
> there is no maven rep
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 09:04 +0200, Markus Wolf wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> >
> >
> >false
> >
> > java-net
> > java.net repository
> >
> > https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/
> > legacy
> >
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
>
>false
>
> java-net
> java.net repository
>
> https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/
> legacy
>
>
This repository and the javax.persistence groupId are great. Thanks for
this.
rote:
> are there any recommendations for groupId and artifactId for Java EE
> Specs available? On the website-guides there are only EJB3 / Persistence
> recommendations, but this does not include the JEE Annotations required
> to deploy something to Glassfish using a
On 7/10/06, Markus Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
are there any recommendations for groupId and artifactId for Java EE
Specs available? On the website-guides there are only EJB3 / Persistence
recommendations, but this does not include the JEE Annotations required
to deploy someth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
are there any recommendations for groupId and artifactId for Java EE
Specs available? On the website-guides there are only EJB3 / Persistence
recommendations, but this does not include the JEE Annotations required
to deploy something to
Hi maven2 gurus,
I try to build the tutorial from Java EE 5 Tutorial with maven2 and it works
good. But I have to do some tasks manually.
First, my application-hierarchy looks like this:
javaeetutorial5
+ pom.xml
+ converter-ejb
+ pom.xml
+ src
+ main
+ target
34 matches
Mail list logo
