Re: Question regarding profile activation

2007-06-22 Thread Tim Kettler
Hi, what version of maven are you using? There was a bug with default activation in maven 2.0 but that was fixed long ago in 2.0.1. -Tim Julien Stern schrieb: Hi list, It seems that a profile marked activeByDefault is never active... Is that a bug or have I missed something? I haved

Question regarding profile activation

2007-06-22 Thread Julien Stern
Hi list, It seems that a profile marked activeByDefault is never active... Is that a bug or have I missed something? I haved defined a profile in a POM that is active by default, e.g: profiles profile idsome-profile/id activation activeByDefaulttrue/activeByDefault

Re: Question regarding profile activation

2007-06-22 Thread Julien Stern
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 02:25:42PM +0200, Tim Kettler wrote: Hi, what version of maven are you using? There was a bug with default activation in maven 2.0 but that was fixed long ago in 2.0.1. I'm using maven 2.0.7 And I have some more insight about the issue: if I have an OTHER profile

Re: Question regarding profile activation

2007-06-22 Thread Tim Kettler
Just tested with 2.0.7 and your pom snippet and all works as expected: With property 'something': [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Develop/testproject$ mvn help:active-profiles -Dsomething [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] Searching repository for plugin with prefix: 'help'. [INFO]

Re: Question regarding profile activation

2007-06-22 Thread Tim Kettler
That's the intended behaviour as far as I know. If you have something that is active all the time it should'nt be in a profile. -Tim Julien Stern schrieb: I saw in the Maven source code that the following behavior was taking place: a activeByDefault profile becomes inactive as soon as an

Re: Question regarding profile activation

2007-06-22 Thread Julien Stern
I saw in the Maven source code that the following behavior was taking place: a activeByDefault profile becomes inactive as soon as an other profile from the same POM gets activated. Is that a bug or a feature? If it is a bug, the patch is a one liner and I can file a JIRA issue. -- Julien On

Re: Question regarding profile activation

2007-06-22 Thread Julien Stern
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Tim Kettler wrote: That's the intended behaviour as far as I know. If you have something that is active all the time it should'nt be in a profile. All right, thanks for the explanation. -- Julien -Tim Julien Stern schrieb: I saw in the Maven

Re: Question regarding profile activation

2007-06-22 Thread Tim Kettler
Yep. Thierry Lach schrieb: So Active by default actually means Active unless something else is active. Right? On 6/22/07, Julien Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Tim Kettler wrote: That's the intended behaviour as far as I know. If you have

Re: Question regarding profile activation

2007-06-22 Thread Thierry Lach
So Active by default actually means Active unless something else is active. Right? On 6/22/07, Julien Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Tim Kettler wrote: That's the intended behaviour as far as I know. If you have something that is active all the