Zos,
you can also use preparationGoals and completionGoals in order to
update any other file that it is not in the pom.xml file
https://maven.apache.org/maven-release/maven-release-plugin/prepare-mojo.html
This is an example of usage in Apache ZooKeeper project:
Hi Zos,
you probably want to write
@project.version@
for your artifact. It will get replaced with the version number of the
enclosing module.
It is listed in the usage page (as a side note):
https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-invoker-plugin/usage.html
Here is a random example of one of
Hello Maven's users
I have a problem about tracking the new snapshot version of an jar
artifact within the integration test running the maven-invoker-plugin.
Each integration test project is using the snapshot version of the jar
artifact as a runtime dependency of a 3rd party maven plugin.
Dear All,
Please help me understand on the below
1. What is the release process that is practiced in general(standard
practice)?
2. Can we do a release from branch?
3. How can we merge the code from branch to trunk, if we have to do a
release only from branch(is there any plugin
the Maven
release process doesn't work with Perforce.
I can pull and build the source. When I use the Jenkins Maven Release
plugin, I give it my personal credentials. My user owns the
Jenkins_master
work space I created. It is the same user used to check out the source
initially.
The error I get
I'm stuck. I don't normally use Perforce. I don't know why the Maven
release process doesn't work with Perforce.
I can pull and build the source. When I use the Jenkins Maven Release
plugin, I give it my personal credentials. My user owns the Jenkins_master
work space I created
Classification: Public
Hi all,
As SVN tags are simply a convention overlayed on top of SVN directories,
SVN tags are therefore mutable. This opens the possibility that someone
could inject code to a tag between the release:prepare and the
release:perform phases.
This would mean that the
Hi Nathan,
No one should ever be committing to an SVN tag that already exists. Unless
the team has malicious committers? Or very clueless ones? In which case you
have much bigger problems...
In other words: isn't this more of a social issue?
-Curtis
On Aug 5, 2013 9:51 AM, Nathan Coast
Hi,
Well, as this is actually something that the SCM itself allows, I would
consider just forbidding on my svn server.
This might be an interesting evolution though to be able to enforce this at
the maven-release-plugin (though unlikely to happen often since the three
usual commits actually
The original behaviour was to tag the local working copy not the remote
tree, so that you could release at any time without having to for e a
quiet period on trunk.
Then a bug in the neon transport for Subversion 1.5 or 1.6 (I cannot recall
which) made tagging from working copies for https based
Classification: Public
Absolutely agree that people should not commit to tags, however we need to
take a more defensive position to guarantee that there is no route for
malicious code to sneak into the release process. As release prepare
and release perform are not atomic, we need a process
Classification: Public
We have considered that route, and unfortunately that option is not
possible for us.
From:
Baptiste MATHUS m...@batmat.net
To:
Maven Users List users@maven.apache.org,
Date:
05/08/2013 16:01
Subject:
Re: how to make the SVN release process more robust
Hi,
Well
: how to make the SVN release process more robust
The original behaviour was to tag the local working copy not the remote
tree, so that you could release at any time without having to for e a
quiet period on trunk.
Then a bug in the neon transport for Subversion 1.5 or 1.6 (I cannot
recall
which
not sure that will help our problem as tags remain mutable. The tag
checked out for release perform could still be corrupted.
From:
Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
To:
Maven Users List users@maven.apache.org,
Date:
05/08/2013 18:00
Subject:
Re: how to make the SVN release
:
Re: how to make the SVN release process more robust
The original behaviour was to tag the local working copy not the remote
tree, so that you could release at any time without having to for e a
quiet period on trunk.
Then a bug in the neon transport for Subversion 1.5 or 1.6 (I cannot
Isn't it possible to handle this in a technical manner` For example, a
rigger script that's invoked upon commit and checks whether the path
contains a tags directory?
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Nathan Coast nathan.co...@db.com wrote:
Classification: Public
Hi all,
As SVN tags are
Hi,
Why does the normal release process require both release:prepare and then
release:perform? Under what conditions would you choose not to do the perform
step after a successful prepare step? Why do both generate source and javadoc
jars and prompt for the PGP pass phrase?
Thanks,
Russ
to function correctly.
Thanks,
Roy Lyons
Senior Configuration Engineer
On 4/17/13 12:34 PM, Russell Gold r...@gold-family.us wrote:
Hi,
Why does the normal release process require both release:prepare and then
release:perform? Under what conditions would you choose not to do the
perform
On 17 Apr 2013, at 7:34 PM, Russell Gold r...@gold-family.us wrote:
Why does the normal release process require both release:prepare and then
release:perform? Under what conditions would you choose not to do the perform
step after a successful prepare step? Why do both generate source
Hi,
My project has dependencies on various common components, that have their
own release lifecycle
To get quicker bug-fixes and features we used to get them as SNAPSHOT, and
when we plan a release we release first the commons, then the project.
To do this, I need to upgrade my POM to switch
This is probably obvious but I think even if you were able to run the
version updates the release plugin will complain about having local
modifications. The updated pom would also need to be committed before the
m-release-p will be happy.
On Mar 4, 2011 5:33 AM, nicolas de loof
Ryan,
Actually, you can modify the pom during preparationGoals as that is
precisely the stage where the pom can be modified because thee release
plugin has just modified it and is building with the modified pom to
validate that the modifications work.
Nicolas,
Perhaps what is needed is another
Hey,
We have a lot of network/system problems that cause our unit tests and site
deployment to fail. I got sick of this interrupting our releases, so I
disabled them both. You're situation is different to mine but maybe you
should so the same?
I've copied my release plugin config... pay special
The best way I know of to solve a circular dependency is to float the
dependency up one level in the build hierarchy.
Just from what I can see here, you're wanting to depend on a configuration
file that lives inside a module in the other modules. If that's not the
goal, then ignore the rest of
Hi there,
I have a multi module project (https://github.com/floggy/parent) that has
two submodules. In the parent project I make reference to one submodule like
this:
plugins
plugin
groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
artifactIdmaven-checkstyle-plugin/artifactId
inheritedtrue/inherited
that is a circular reference... the big is that you are allowed to make such
a cycle.
the reason why this is not allowed is that maven constructs the build plan
up front, and when a plugin depends on a module from the reactor, then the
build plan could (in theory) be affected based on the result
Humm, ok! Is there anything that I can do to change this? Advices in how
organize the projects?
How about add a flag to the release-plugin indicating to reactor that it
can resolve the plugin dependencies if such dependency is generate during
the build?
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:26 PM,
the issue is that you should be depending on the previous released version
of the dependency...
what plugin needs this as a dependency
... might be a question of getting a change in that plugin to get your build
to work right
- Stephen
---
Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling
I have a multi-module build that's failing on site generation.
Unfortunately, I'm unable to attach the actual project to this request (or
an issue).
I'm currently working in the target/checkout directory of the released
aggregator project.
I have 4 active modules and one that's not listed in the
is that exec-maven is invoked
both during release:prepare and release:perform. This execution takes a
long time, so invoking it twice is really not at all desirable. How can I
configure the release plugin so that it doesn't cause this execution to be
invoked twice during the release process
not at all desirable. How can I
configure the release plugin so that it doesn't cause this execution to be
invoked twice during the release process?
plugins
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdexec-maven-plugin/artifactId
desirable. How can I
configure the release plugin so that it doesn't cause this execution to be
invoked twice during the release process?
plugins
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdexec-maven-plugin/artifactId
Hello,
I'd like to perform a release (with mavean-release-plugin) with this
process :
Make release candidate v1-beta1 = ok
Perform tests
If tests are ko, make a new relesase candidate v1-beta2 = ok
Perform tests
If tests are ok, i'd like to make the final release (v1) and i want to be
sure
You can do whatever you need to do with versions, but this isn't
really the workflow associated with the maven-release-plugin. The
release plugin exists to automate the following process:
Prepare
1. Take the current working copy - assume you have version 1.2-SNAPSHOT
2. Update the version
...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 14. September 2009 01:00
An: Maven Users List
Betreff: Re: Automated release process
Thanks Thomas,
we're using hudson as our CI server but I don't really
understand how this
will solve my problem for me. We've got hudson setup to
deploy snapshots to
our archiva
List
Betreff: Re: Automated release process
Thanks Thomas,
we're using hudson as our CI server but I don't really
understand how this
will solve my problem for me. We've got hudson setup to
deploy snapshots to
our archiva repository on every svn commit and we're using
unique/timestamped
). But you would have to do that with Maven
anyway.
Best regards,
Eric
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Matt Milliss [mailto:matt.mill...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 14. September 2009 01:00
An: Maven Users List
Betreff: Re: Automated release process
Thanks Thomas,
we're using
.
Best regards,
Eric
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Matt Milliss [mailto:matt.mill...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 14. September 2009 01:00
An: Maven Users List
Betreff: Re: Automated release process
Thanks Thomas,
we're using hudson as our CI server but I don't really
Thanks Thomas,
we're using hudson as our CI server but I don't really understand how this
will solve my problem for me. We've got hudson setup to deploy snapshots to
our archiva repository on every svn commit and we're using
unique/timestamped snapshots, but not really sure how hudson can
Hi!
It sounds as you need a CI server. It would solve your issue. Take a look at
CruiseControl:
http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/
Hudson:
https://hudson.dev.java.net/
/Thomas
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 13:10, Matt Milliss matt.mill...@gmail.com wrote:
I work at a company that has around 10
I work at a company that has around 10 applications, each application is
a maven project, each of which may or may not get modified in a given 2
week iteration. At the end of every iteration I want an automated
process for checking which applications have been modified since the
last release
how can i define the local directory?
please could you post a pom.xml snippet for that?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. März 2009 22:57
An: Maven Users List
Betreff: Re: SpeedUp the release process
we
Hudson deploys our site nightly, we don't publish the site at all with
releases - the release now takes only a fraction of what it used to take
with site deploy (15-20mins compared to 2.5h).
Kalle
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
we
Hi folks,
i have a multi-module-project (~30 artifacts).
I wrote a little script to release the whole project from root
- check dependencies
- try site-build
- try release:prepare
- clean up
- release:prepare
- release:perform
- deploy new snapshots
My repository works with webdav behind a
Mar 2009 19:25:11 +0100
Subject: SpeedUp the release process
Hi folks,
i have a multi-module-project (~30 artifacts).
I wrote a little script to release the whole project from root
- check dependencies
- try site-build
- try release:prepare
- clean up
- release:prepare
we deploy the site to a local directory and then afterwards copy the site to
the web server location
2009/3/27 Hoehmann, Andreas andreas.hoehmann@siemens.com
Hi folks,
i have a multi-module-project (~30 artifacts).
I wrote a little script to release the whole project from root
- check
Hello,
I'm planning my release process with help of the release plugin :
1. my project is version N-SNAPSHOT
2. running release:prepare tags my project as version N and commit POM for
N+1-SNAPSHOT
3. running release:perform creates the binary distribution from tag
4. I deploy the binary to my
--- nicolas de loof [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello,
I'm planning my release process with help of the release plugin :
1. my project is version N-SNAPSHOT
2. running release:prepare tags my project as version N and commit POM for
N+1-SNAPSHOT
3. running release:perform creates
Also take a look at the maven release process - it also use a staging
repository (http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html) but
doesn't explain how to rollback if the vote didn't pass.
I'm not the only one that expect to rollback to my initial SNAPSHOT trunk
after a staging release
:
Make a copy of the checked out project in this state in case you need to
roll back the release
cd ..
cp -r trunk trunk-prepared
cd trunk
Also take a look at the maven release process - it also use a staging
repository (http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
the resource in the pom they will be copied
during the release process.
Or am I wrong and doesn't understand nothing at all :-)
Luca
Brian E Fox wrote:
Are these resources not inside your scm? Why would they not be picked up
from the checkout folder? Are you using absolute paths or something?
Something
that to the repository and then use dependency:unpack to pull
these down and put them somewhere you can pick them up.
-Original Message-
From: Luca Tagliani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 4:16 AM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: RE: Release process
To be more precise I
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 4:16 AM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: RE: Release process
To be more precise I will describe more in detail.
I have some resources located on the filesystem of my PC that isn't inside
my scm, because they are platform dependent
to do this?
Thanks in advance
Luca
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Release-process-tp15950826s177p15950826.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
: Monday, March 10, 2008 11:37 AM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Release process
Hi all,
I'm using the release plugin with a subversion SCM to release a war.
I want to perform a release including the resources specified in the
resource tag of my pom, but the plugin doesn't copy them.
When I do
, 2008 11:37 AM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Release process
Hi all,
I'm using the release plugin with a subversion SCM to release a war.
I want to perform a release including the resources specified in the
resource tag of my pom, but the plugin doesn't copy them.
When I do
: Monday, March 10, 2008 6:48 PM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: RE: Release process
I mean that during the release:perform the war is built using the
content of
the target/checkout directory and the resources placed outside the
src/main/resources directory (but specified in the resources tag
On Mar 4, 2008, at 6:13 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Arash Bizhan zadeh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is 6 Tomcat 5.5 sandboxes, all of them running on RHE 6.
There is a
load balancer in front of them and we need to release every app on
all of
them. I am
appliance.
We use Maven to build the artifact and searching for a good approach to
automate release process under these sandboxes. The ideal solution will be a
maven plugin to handle it all.
Thanks in advance for any advise.
-regards,
Arash
--
You can not depend on your eyes when your imagination
need a tool to release our web-based application in production sandboxes.
We have multiple sandboxes which are load-balanced with a CISCO appliance.
We use Maven to build the artifact and searching for a good approach to
automate release process under these sandboxes. The ideal solution
some feedback.
We need a tool to release our web-based application in production
sandboxes.
We have multiple sandboxes which are load-balanced with a CISCO
appliance.
We use Maven to build the artifact and searching for a good approach to
automate release process under these sandboxes
multiple sandboxes which are load-balanced with a CISCO
appliance.
We use Maven to build the artifact and searching for a good approach to
automate release process under these sandboxes. The ideal solution will
be a
maven plugin to handle it all.
Thanks in advance for any advise
.
We have multiple sandboxes which are load-balanced with a CISCO
appliance.
We use Maven to build the artifact and searching for a good approach
to
automate release process under these sandboxes. The ideal solution
will
be a
maven plugin to handle it all.
Thanks
which are load-balanced with a CISCO
appliance.
We use Maven to build the artifact and searching for a good approach
to
automate release process under these sandboxes. The ideal solution
will
be a
maven plugin to handle it all.
Thanks in advance for any advise
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Arash Bizhan zadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is 6 Tomcat 5.5 sandboxes, all of them running on RHE 6. There is a
load balancer in front of them and we need to release every app on all of
them. I am looking for the best practices to manage the releases.
Hi,
Please pardon me for such a long mail but couldn't cut it any shorter.
After 2 months of being assigned the task of mavenizing the whole
product at my workplace and build and release automation process with
Continuous Integration, I have been able to mavenize the product and
put continuum and
]
Sent: Wed 2/6/2008 9:25 AM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Conceptual Confusion about build and release process using maven.
Hi,
Please pardon me for such a long mail but couldn't cut it any shorter.
After 2 months of being assigned the task of mavenizing the whole
product at my workplace
Now my confusion over my own understanding and assumption is:
1) During the development process within an iteration, how to make
sure that all the module owners dependent on a.jar keeps up to date
with the changing versions of a.jar as the development goes on until
Integration Testing.
In my
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 09:47 -0500, Edelson, Justin wrote:
1) During the development process within an iteration, how to make
sure that all the module owners dependent on a.jar keeps up to date
with the changing versions of a.jar as the development goes on until
Integration Testing.
It
Hi,
I recommend reading chapter 7, Team Collaboration with Maven, from Better
Builds with Maven.
Nicole
On 07/02/2008, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 09:47 -0500, Edelson, Justin wrote:
1) During the development process within an iteration, how to make
sure that
amit kumar wrote:
Hi,
1) During the development process within an iteration, how to make
sure that all the module owners dependent on a.jar keeps up to date
with the changing versions of a.jar as the development goes on until
Integration Testing.
Use version ranges. Developers can update
I noticed that Continuum provides a Release function.
So far I failed located documentation on this function. We are using
the Maven Release process and I am exited about the possibility to
execute a release from within Continuum. Unfortunately I do not have
the time to play with the function
Andreas Guther a écrit :
I noticed that Continuum provides a Release function.
So far I failed located documentation on this function. We are using
the Maven Release process and I am exited about the possibility to
execute a release from within Continuum. Unfortunately I do not have
Hi,
We currently have the following process for our releases:
Walk the DAG of our modules in a breadth-first traversal [1] and for
each module being released:
1) Create a branch in Subversion.
2) Check out the branch
3) Update the POMs so that no SNAPSHOT dependencies are stil in the
POMs and
You can use the release plugin on a multi-module project, and it will
it walk the module graph for you. You can also run release:prepare
with -B (batch mode) so that all defaults will be used automatically.
On 7/30/07, James Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We currently have the following
On 30/07/07, Tom Huybrechts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can use the release plugin on a multi-module project, and it will
it walk the module graph for you.
That's what I doing currently. Nearly all of our SVN modules are
Maven2 multi-module projects; there's an unfortunate overloading of
the
But if a new test case is introduced then the maintainer of the
1.2.3.4
pom should increment the bug-fix number (or whatever name is best used
here) so the new version would be 1.2.4.0
I mean the maintainer should trigger maven to increment the bug-fix
number
He himself doesn't need to
-Original Message-
From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ah, I basically see what your problem is...
that is what the whole SNAPSHOT concept addresses...
where you are saying a project would only care about 1.2.3 and not the
build numbers..that is functionally
there have been threads on this on the maven-users and maven-dev lists...
in fact Kenny has written extensively on this topic I believe :)
if your interested in contributing to this effort, I would take a look
there for places to help out.
the fundamental problem your dealing with is that
-Original Message-
From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
there have been threads on this on the maven-users and maven-dev
lists...
in fact Kenny has written extensively on this topic I believe :)
I've searched the web for Kenny, version, maven-dev, maven-user and my
From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ok, I am a bit confused by what your actually asking here...
but there is no reason in the world you can't use w.x.y.z
versioning...
Well, since maven's main idea is to promote conventions.. and these
conventions is there to ease and
what aspect of maven do you think is killing this use case?
1.2.3.4-SNAPSHOT when its run through the release process will offer
up as a default 1.2.3.5-SNAPSHOT as the new development version and
1.2.3.4 as the released version...
deployment will work...whats killing this for you
or 1.2.4.0
Is my point clearer?
johan
-Original Message-
From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Maven2 release process in Continuum
what aspect of maven do you think is killing this use case?
1.2.3.4
On 18/07/07, Mykel Alvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) There is potential for me to check in the release version, start
preparing the release and then someone else checks out the release
version and starts doing stuff to it, when they should really be
waiting until the next SNAPSHOT version
continuum for releases myself,
but it does work.
If your interested in improving that support and making your life
easier, then there isn't a reason you couldn't add a page into the
release process that scanned all releasing projects and prompts the
user to resolve dependency versions to resolved
. Currently, it takes
around a day to release a product, which feels like longer than it
should.
We were hoping that using Continuum would save a lot of time versus
the current release process, which involves mvn release:prepare
-D. and mvn releaes:perform -D... for a lot of modules.
I
: Maven2 release process in Continuum
On 18/07/07, Jesse McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at the moment I think you need to make sure the underlying project
that you are going to try and release is 'clean' for the release.
that means that all dependencies that you are going to release ave
been
: Maven2 release process in Continuum
I dunno how continuum does version releasing but as far as I know
about
version releasing is that once you're happy with say build w.x.y.z You
then: (assuming that all pom has its current version explicitly stated
in the file, and it's formatted as p.q.r.s
interested in improving that support and making your life
easier, then there isn't a reason you couldn't add a page into the
release process that scanned all releasing projects and prompts the
user to resolve dependency versions to resolved versions. the page
would then use maven scm to commit
Hello,
Johan Iskandar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BUT, I wonder whether maven encourages an explicit declaration of
version in the pom(just as the above assumption)? Please advise? Also
why does it use SNAPSHOT instead of build version..(the letter z in my
example)?
Yes, maven enforces an
longer than it
should.
We were hoping that using Continuum would save a lot of time versus
the current release process, which involves mvn release:prepare
-D. and mvn releaes:perform -D... for a lot of modules.
I haven't found much documentation about the release feature, so
1) There is potential for me to check in the release version, start
preparing the release and then someone else checks out the release
version and starts doing stuff to it, when they should really be
waiting until the next SNAPSHOT version has been checked in. I guess I
can use locking for that,
feels like longer than it
should.
We were hoping that using Continuum would save a lot of time versus
the current release process, which involves mvn release:prepare
-D. and mvn releaes:perform -D... for a lot of modules.
I haven't found much documentation about the release feature, so would
-Message d'origine-
De : Shukla, Sanjay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 21 octobre 2005 21:48
À : users@maven.apache.org
Objet : build release process using maven
I am trying to use maven for our build process, migrating
from ant and other script files that do our
I am trying to use maven for our build process, migrating from ant and other
script files that do our build currently
For deploying to an environment these are the steps that were taken.
1. Tag the release
2. run a script that would create a list of release differences with
respect
step 1 is a role of the release plugin (release:prepare).
step 2 doesn't exist (we have a changelog report but not one that
diffs two tags). It would not be too hard to write given that we
already have all the SCM related code in the maven SCM library.
- Brett
On 10/20/05, Shukla, Sanjay [EMAIL
I am trying to use maven for our build process, migrating from ant and other
script files that do our build currently
For deploying to an environment these are the steps that were taken.
1. Tag the release
2. run a script that would create a list of release differences with
respect
97 matches
Mail list logo