Hi Team,
We are using Apache Maven 3.6.2 version and we found out that multi-module
partial archetype is not supported.
When applying a partial multimodule archetype on an existing multimodule
project, few things like below should work.
• -- existing pom/module poms should be merged
•
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven
3.6.3
Apache Maven is a software project management and comprehension tool. Based on
the concept of a project object model (POM), Maven can manage a project's
build, reporting and documentation from a central piece of
Hi John,
On 24.11.19 20:46, John Patrick wrote:
i'm trying to start using maven version range more but having issues
with things like guava and also it not excluding version i believe
should be excluded.
1) i don't think this is possible but it might be, take a look a
google guava, it has a
> thoughts?
(I don't design or use Maven version ranges)
I agree that the behavior below, such as "5.0.0-SNAPSHOT" < "5", is not
intuitive for users.
Our team in Google recently articulated good practices of maintaining
dependencies. One of the topics is "not to use version range":
I've recently had the same line of thought...
Many projects publishing "release candidates" or "milestone releases". I
understand
this is great for having feedback from their user base, but sometimes
I'd rather use
a "stable" version. Although this brings a new question to the table:
who
cheers for the information.
I expect this might be asking space vs tabs, but do others feel the
version range of "[4,5)" should exclude anything starting 5, include
5-SNAPSHOT and any 5...-RC* or 5...-alpha
It seams wrong to have to use "[4,4.999)".
I understand from a maths point of
