Hi,
What is the best way to use handlers server side, when the messages
are long, i.e. when they are divided into more buffers (different
calls of IoHandlerAdapter.messageReceived())?
I am using the StreamIoHandler, which helps to sum up the different
buffers into a Stream wrapper. I
Hi!
I'm developing event-driven software. I'm trying to catch all messages
in network socket and manage it.
Every message:
Catch message - See content - Compare with rules - Redelivery message
The program need manage message and redelivery in less time possible,
and this programa will be used
Abhijit Bhatode wrote:
Hi,
We need to use Apache MINA 2.0 for server development. Apache MINA site
recommends using 1.1 version as it is the most stable release.
Can you please let us know the possible release timeline/roadmap for the
next release for MINA 2.0?
Nope... If by the end of this
I would look at it this way
Use 2.0 for your development. The more people that use it, the more
bugs/issues are found and can be resolved. I have been developing a
program that has been using 2.0 for 6 months and have had very little
issue with it.
..just my $.02
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at
Hi,
We need to use Apache MINA 2.0 for server development. Apache MINA site
recommends using 1.1 version as it is the most stable release.
Can you please let us know the possible release timeline/roadmap for the
next release for MINA 2.0?
Thanks,
Abhijit
DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may
It is somewhat difficult to say which is a better approach because it's
case-by-base.
In general, you need to write an efficient decoder and I/O handler which
don't consume a lot of memory. For example, you could make your decoder
not to buffer all the content of the long message but to
I'm using 2.0-M1 as well.
No issues so far.
-str
On May 14, 2008, at 8:42 AM, Mark Webb wrote:
I would look at it this way
Use 2.0 for your development. The more people that use it, the more
bugs/issues are found and can be resolved. I have been developing a
program that has been using
