Hi,
i have a TCP server with bind on 55000 port
and two (or more) client that send message on the same socket (port).
How i can have a handler that receive all incoming client tcp message?
thank you
i have mina server that read tcp message.
to this server there are two clients that send messages on the same port
(55000)
just a moment, i can explain my problem with an example
in mina-2.0.0-M4 package there's the imagine tutorial at this
Pietro Guerrieri wrote:
i have mina server that read tcp message.
to this server there are two clients that send messages on the same port
(55000)
just a moment, i can explain my problem with an example
in mina-2.0.0-M4 package there's the imagine tutorial at this
You can have an application that listens on port 33789 that can handle
several (potentially thousands) of clients connecting to it.
You don't need to worry about how, the operating system will take care of it.
MINA is an excellent choice for this, and will let you handle all the
clients (in MINA
Hello,
I have an application making use of Mina 2.0.0 M5.
I have an executor filter in my filter chain, after everything but the handler.
Based on everything I read and saw in the forums, I'm expecting that it
would make use of the OrderedThreadPoolExecutor. Am I correct that the benefit
of
Christopher Popp wrote:
Hello,
I have an application making use of Mina 2.0.0 M5.
I have an executor filter in my filter chain, after everything but the handler.
Based on everything I read and saw in the forums, I'm expecting that it would
make use of the OrderedThreadPoolExecutor. Am I
Sorry to get to you guys a little late on this issue, as it is not always easy
to reproduce the problem.
During this extensive performance testing and close monitoring, one thing I can
tell for sure is that under heavy load, the memory pattern looks so much nicer
if we get rid of the finalize
