刘尚�� wrote:
哈哈.原来有chinese 在上面
can you please full english when posting to this mailing list?
Thanks !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
The Travel Assistance Committee is taking in applications for those wanting
to attend ApacheCon US 2009 (Oakland) which takes place between the 2nd and
6th November 2009.
The Travel Assistance Committee is looking for people who would like to be
able to attend ApacheCon US 2009 who may need some
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 10:42 +0200, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Bruno de Carvalho wrote:
Hi,
Before I begin, let me just throw out a big 'thank you' to the folks
that made MINA what it is. It's truly a remarkable library and besides
using and abusing it, I've also been recommending it to
Hello,
Speaking in numbers, executing the test multiple times, I get a constant
global average of ~1ms lifetime, but individual lifetime measurement
averages ranges 40~80ms.
I downloaded your code and gave it a run...it printed out the following with
the defaults (no sleep).
Chris,
Thanks for your attention and time.
It is in fact reasonable but if you increase the sleep time - say,
like 4ms - you will notice that the individual lifetime average goes
lower than that those 5ms.
What I'm trying to understand is why that individual lifetime is
greater than the global
Bruno,
I want to give you some result we get on Apache Directory Server, which
is based on MINA.
Currenly on my laptop, a 2Ghz centrino, I'm able to process around 4000
search requests per second. That mean a request is handled in *less than
a 1/4 millisecond*. And trust me on that, the
