Hello, Michael.
Your JSF version is basically defined by JSF implementation you use in
your project. If you use one that ships with RAD7, i guess it would be
1.1. At least, web-facesconfig.dtd version has nothing to do with JSF
impl version. If you use myfaces:
1. jar file naming should tell you
Hi.
What is the server/version you are trying to deploy 1.2.x demo to? Does
it support JSF 1.2 (JSP2.1) ?
aj1m wrote:
hi;
i am trying to deploy trinidad demo; so i succeed to deploy the version
(trinidad-blank-1.0.2.war and trinidad-demo-1.0.2.war) but when i tried to
deloy the
JSF1.2 support was added in tomcat 6. If I'm not mistaken, JBoss =
4.2.0 is tomcat 6 based. So you should try upgrading to at least 4.2 if
you want to use JSF 1.2.
Hope it helps.
aj1m wrote:
i tried many server like tomcat 5 and jboss 4.0.5.GA but i always get error.
and i dont know how it can
I have just downloaded JBoss AS 4.2.1 and successfully ran trinidad
examples 1.2.1 on it. Should you try the same - don't forget to remove
myfaces JSF1.2 from war and accordingly remove startup listener from
web.xml.
aj1m wrote:
i tried it in tomcat 6. but it didnt work.
As I already wrote:
Should you try the same - don't forget to remove myfaces JSF1.2 from
war and accordingly remove startup listener from web.xml.
JSF 1.2 spec requires JSF impl to be generally server-provided, if there
are both project- and server-level JSF implementations then server's
take
It is not clear, weather you use redirect navigation rule. If you don't use
redirect/ for navigation rule, you can refer bean2 directly from bean1:
FacesContext fctx = FacesContext.getCurrentContext()
Bean2 b2 = fctx.getApplication().getVariableResolver().resolveVariable( fctx,
bean2 );
Hi!
It looks like client-side validation is intentionally skipped if form is
submitted via tr:form defaultCommand. Can anyone explain why such a decision
was taken by devs or just why it's useful for client-side to be skipped in this
case?
Thanks in advance.
P.S. At least tr:form behaves like
No, I didn't meant that you should redirect programmatically. In both cases you
use faces-config NavigationRule to handle transition. 'redirect' is merely
parameter on how to handle that transition. If redirect/ is present, then
navigation will be handled traditional way: server asks browser to
Just noticed: if form is initially submitted by 'enter' and then by
commandButton, then most of inline error messages are doubled. First ones are
printed by server-side validation (client-side skipped by defaultCommand),
second - by client-side.
Hi!
It looks like client-side validation is
Hi, Renzo.
I don't think any component would do such a thing internally. After all,
component just evaluate EL and can't figure out, when it is undesired.
As a solution I can recommend you to use
FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getRenderResponse() to detect, when
getter is called during
Hi.
I was making up yet another page when noticed that when i open it in the
browser about 10-15 warning got printed to console:
07.09.2007 0:18:07
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.io.DebugHtmlResponseWriter
_errorWithComment
WARNING: Illegal HTML: cannot put a tr element in a td element.
I
an JIRA bug and we'll get this fixed asap.
Thanks,
Danny
On 9/6/07, *Vadim Dmitriev* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi!
It looks like client-side validation is intentionally skipped if
form is submitted via tr:form defaultCommand. Can anyone explain
why
Impl - 1.0.2), skin:rast.desktop
(rast)--/html
Thanks.
Danny Robinson wrote:
If you can supply the source page snippet and the rendered output we
should be able to figure out if there's a problem to report.
Thx,
Danny
On 9/6/07, * Vadim Dmitriev* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
It's not each component in every subform. I stripped page code of
unimportant layout for that warning source can be easily pinpointed.
Originally there are 5-10 inputs per subform. It's rather complex form
with about 100 input components. They all must be lined up and some
blocks must have partial
You may find it useful. Today I faced similar problem with
validating-two-separate-mandatory-fields.
I ended up using h:hiddenText value=1 required=true
validator=#{validating.function} / somewhere after these two input
components. So validating function is invoked in processValidations
phase even
Hi.
tr:messages by default outputs messages in form label - massage. In my
application I actively use EL expressions in components labels. Problem is that
these labels got printed by tr:messages like this EL expressions are simple
strings.
For example #{resourceBundle['some.label']} - value
Small follow-up: seems that labels are displayed correctly while client-side
validation processes errors. When server-side validation kicks in - tr:messages
labels turn to EL
Hi.
tr:messages by default outputs messages in form label - massage. In my
application I actively use EL
Hi, Darren.
Correct me if I'm wrong: you want second tr:inputText not to be rendered
if #{bean1.appointGprnRender} is true? Then you can simply change
#{bean1.appointGprnRender} to something like
#{!bean2.appointGprnRender bean1.appointGprnRender} (for second
input changes are similar).
Stephen Friedrich wrote:
Thanks a lot Vadim - the layout is looking nice now.
Somehow I never noticed the showRequired attribute.
I additionally needed to add a message component plus some layout.
Just in case: if you added tr:message to display messages of
tr:selectOneChoice
Hi.
You can try something like that (removed all EL's to test it locally):
tr:form defaultCommand=saveButton
tr:panelFormLayout
tr:subform default=true
tr:panelLabelAndMessagefor=projectLeadSelect
styleClass=inputLabel_10
Adam Winer wrote:
On 8/28/07, Vadim Dmitriev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
As far as I know ADF had some limitation regarding client-side
validation with subforms. Suppose we have following block in a page:
tr:form
tr:inputText required=true /
tr:subform
tr:inputText
tr:inputText required=true label=Sub Default:/
tr:commandButton text=Submit Default/
/tr:subform
tr:commandButton text=Submit Outside/
/tr:form
/tr:document
On 8/28/07, *Vadim Dmitriev* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
22 matches
Mail list logo
